According to Parliamentary legend, a certain National MP once called the Labour Party "a bunch of woolly, woofterish w**kers" during a heated exchange in the debating chamber.
A Labour MP immediately challenged this on the basis the last word in that sentence was clearly un-parliamentary (we will spare NBR ONLINE readers' blushes by not spelling it out in full, but any of our readers who attended primary school from around 1960 onwards will be familiar with it).
The Speaker of the time, though, was not, and said he could not rule the word out of order because he did not know what it meant.
For a brief period, parliamentary decorum (a vastly over-rated concept, in my experience) hung in the balance. If the Speaker ruled the word not out of order, MPs would be able to use it in the future.
Someone – probably the Clerk of the House – explained to the Speaker the meaning of the dreaded word (oh, to have been a fly on the wall during that little tutorial) and the term was quickly ruled out.
In the context of parliamentary exchanges, yesterday's fit of the vapours over Minister for Social Development Paula Bennett's appellation of "sweetie" to her Labour counterpart, Jacinda Ardern, hardly looks worthy of the attention given to it.
Not only did it trigger what appeared to be a collective swoon on the Labour benches about "offensive" language, but it seems to have led to the kind of blanket coverage normally used for Hobbit premieres or David Bain retrials.
Granted, an MP saying "Zip it sweetie" to another MP isn't all that edifying behaviour, and perhaps suggests that MP has been watching rather too many episodes of comic TV series Absolutely Fabulous, but the reaction has been absolutely fatuous.
It caused a "furore" and an "uproar" in the House.
Well, a few MPs did the whole quivering with outrage thing, but this is what opposition MPs – of any party – do, most of the time. Its meant to convey outrage at whatever the dastardly government is doing but it usually just conveys their own frustration at not being on the Treasury benches.
Their supporters in the online world of the blogoverse and twittersphere did much the same, with knobs on: but again, this is all very well rehearsed, kneejerk ersatz indignation.
I stress this is a universal thing. It happens whoever is in opposition, and I suspect having to be in a constant state of fake indignation must be one of the most soul destroying aspects of being an opposition MP.
It is certainly wearisome to watch.
If Labour's MPs – or anyone else – is genuinely outraged over this rather silly but utterly innocuous comment they really need to get a bit of a better perspective on these things.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Joyce associates openly talking about leadership change
- Pulse Energy investors get mixed messages on board's takeover view
- Kelsey’s bid to put rocket under Groser fails
- Scentre Group to sell three Westfield malls to NZ firms for $549m
- Court protection sought for latecomers to James Hardie leaky homes class action
Most listened to
What's the story behind the story? Our special feature audio offers a mix of comment from journalists, experts and panel discussions.
- Tim Hunter on why Veritas is doing it the hard way
- Matthew Hooton on whether Steven Joyce will be the next national leader
- Rodney Hide on why all city planners should be fired
- Rob Hosking breaks down the political and economic week that was
- "A tragedy" - David Farrar on his disappointment with Simon Bridges
- New F&P product pipeline exciting, says Macquarie senior investment adviser Brad Gordon
- Taupo Motorsport Park executive director Tony Walker on the park's rebranding
- NZIER senior economist Christina Leung on why she does not think the OCR will hit 2%
- NBR's Cameron Officer talks about the NBR Car of the Year 2015
- John Barnett on Brewer: ‘Boy, has he got a bit to learn’
- Tech commentator Paul Brislen discusses the Concept Envirochip ad
- Jason Walls breaks down the week's biggest news in macroeconomics