Ansell eyes ‘Treatygate’ party for 2014
Advertising guru John Ansell, who earlier launched a campaign for a "colour blind" New Zealand, is considering creating a new single-issue political party.
The man who created National’s “Iwi-Kiwi” billboards in 2005 (paving the way for National's return to power at the next election and, ironically, its alliance with the Maori Party) says he is coming under pressure for such a group to stand in the 2014 election.
Mr Ansell also warns of further Maori claims, including iwi wanting the sun, and he brands groups such as the Maori Council as his best recruiting sergeants.
His comments follow last week’s government delay of the partial privatisation of Mighty River Power following pressure from the Maori Council, plus a claim submitted by Northland-based iwi Ngapuhi over commercial use of the wind.
“The land grab has turned into a water grab, which in turn has turned into a wind grab. I wouldn’t be surprised if they claimed the sun next since Maui claimed to have slowed down the sun,” Mr Ansell told NBR ONLINE.
Has already raised almost $100,000
He says in just a few weeks he has raised almost $100,000 towards his $2 million target to fund an advertising campaign and related citizen’s initiated referendum on whether voters want a "colour blind" state.
This comprises donations ranging from $20 to $50,000 but he won’t say is any have come from wealthy Southland supporter Louis Crimp.
“I’m not naming names but there are two donations in the tens of thousands, and I haven’t yet approached the biggest potential funders in the land.”
Mr Ansell says the controversies over Mighty River Power, wind claims and the like are helping his campaign.
“I think the Maori Council are our best allies. They are creating the impression Maori tribes are gangs of extortionists appeased by a chamber of Chamberlains.”
Wants to make a distinction
However, he wants to make a distinction between what he calls “Maori grievers” and “Maori achievers”.
“The Pakeha appeasers are probably the most guilty. The grievers are taking advantage of weak Pakeha appeasers, governments seeking their vote and scared of being called racist.
“Prime Minister John Key has opened the Pandora’s box, and it’s his own fault.”
Mr Ansell doubts that either the courts or the politicians could "restore" democracy under a “colour blind” state.
“I don’t have a lot of faith in political parties. They are the ones who have let us down. They have provided problems. I’m tired of working with political parties who don’t follow through.
"We need to go hard. We need a bunker-buster strategy. We need real cut-through. That’s why we need a major ad campaign where we control the words and pictures.
“People are calling for me to stand in a one-off political party, to do one thing and one thing only, to create a colour blind state, where state funding is based on need, not race.”
Such a party would be created from the campaign for a citizen’s initiated referendum asking voters if they want a "colour blind" state.
“If we get support for a one-issue, one-time only political party that would apply further pressure we would sit on the cross-benches.”
Mr Ansell says his campaign has been gathering pace, with more than 20 media interviews, including a couple on television, and an invitation to speak at a Rotary Club in Auckland – though he says it is not Orewa, where former National Party leader Don Brash made his famous speech on ‘"nationhood" in 2004.
There have been supportive comments on Treaty of Waitangi issues from former ACT leader Rodney Hide and left-wing commentators such as Chris Trotter, but he expects little support from the media and politicians.
Misrepresenting our history
Instead, he says a “large number of our elite are misrepresenting history".
“What people don’t realise is the fabricating of large parts of New Zealand’s history which is taught in schools. I have been studying that for over a year.”
On his blog, Mr Ansell also claims there was such "doctoring" of evidence in recent Treaty claims but those who have informed him will not go on record.
“If the griever Maori are going to be rorting for wrongs that were committed by our British forebears – if they are going to do that by misrepresenting history – we are going to have to rehabilitate the names of our ancestors, who were much more compassionate than are presented,” he says.
“My angle is to create a colour blind state, but if billions of dollars are being handed out on the basis of a false representation of history, we need to correct that history."
But rather than being racist, as opponents claim, he does want a "pakeha state".
“I want a vibrant multi-cultural, multi-coloured state. We have a multicultural society already. I am not talking about extinguishing anyone’s culture but turning off the tap to griever Maori who are the petulant teenage brats of society.
"These grievers can reflect the attributes of boorish teenagers. They are rude like Hone ‘motherf****r’ Harawira, they exaggerate like Tariana ‘holocaust' Turia, they bully like Tame ‘training camps’ Iti, they have a massively inflated sense of entitlement like Willie ‘racist’ Jackson and Maanu ‘give us the water’ Paul."
Laments today's Maori leaders
Mr Ansell further laments today’s Maori leaders.
“There are no Sir Aripana Ngatas on the horizon. Where are the Sir Peter Bucks, the James Carrolls, these fine gentlemen when I went to the Maori Select Committee room who were beaming down from the walls?”
He also laments the lack of "achiever" Maori taking a stance.
“I don’t know where they are. Perhaps they are in Australia. I am being abused as a racist, but I wish the 'achiever Maori' would claim the mantle of Maoridom from the 'grievers'. I am not anti-Maori and I do not speak for Maori,” he says.
“A lot of them feel like me but none of them have the courage to stand up to these 'griever Maori'. It is not pleasant territory, but so be it. If we don’t [stand up] the New Zealand as we know it may soon be over because of the sneaky way the government goes about things."
Mr Ansell says there was "pathetic" consultation over the government’s Marine & Coastal Area Bill and the current Constitutional Advisory Panel is only meeting “with people who will agree with it”.
To counter this, he says he needs money for his referendum, and a prospective party if this had sufficient support.
“It’s not a left and right issue. It goes right across the political spectrum. I would be happy to stand with people who are political opponents. Labour’s David Parker was one of the strongest opponents of the Marine & Coastal Area Bill,” he says.























Comments and questions39
Good on you, move on it. Where do we donate to.
The bank account number is:
12-3141-0106590-01
Reference: Colourblind State
Particulars: Your name
Thanks!
Come to Poroti big mouth. We haven't complained about 23, 000 acres gone by unwanted survey fees leaving us 37 acres of reserves for our dead, and a water supply. Now we can't even control that because Regional Council have fully allocated it and for 35 years. No doubt thats perfectly OK in your eyes. You 're misinformed and feeding off all the racists. People like you start wars..
Interesting thought piece that.
one thing about the treaty- colonial oppressors were trying to screw Maori right? Why is everybody reading into the treaty beyond this original colonial intent? Huh?
Also, what is racist about the 'blood quantum' ?
Mr Ansell is on to something and the existing parties had better watch out. I live in the safest blue seat in the country yet despite being surrounded by genuine swinging voters, due to the old blue rinse set you could stick Minnie Mouse up and they would get in. In fact we have ended up with an equivalent. Yet on the treaty and maori issue I can promise an avalanche of votes even from the oldies. It will be worth a couple of years of disruption and spoilt brat tantrums just to get rid of all race based nonsense once and for all. The greedy half castes need to be told the gravy train is munted.
There are not half castes generally anon. As winter pointed out on the tv you only need in part Maori blood in 512 to ride the gravy train.
Do you even know how many generations you have to go back to be 1/512th Maori? That would be your Great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather.... At 25 years a generation that's about 175 years... I suspect there might be more 'colour' in your background than you think.
You've got our vote. Do it!
At last someone with some backbone!
John Ansell will get overwhelming support in his efforts to reign in this gravy-train.
WG
The media will call you racists so you need a strong and aggressive counter to that.
They are spineless appeasers and intellectual frauds who are sending NZ down the disastrous path of indigenous privilege that destroyed Fiji.
This country is in danger of being another Zimbabwe. White flight = money gone. Its strange because you see Ngai Tahu in the SI building and creating in a straight up manner. Tainui have their ructions but they are still moving forward. I am an anti-racist but I also dont like bums and bludgers - none of us who work hard like paying taxes which dissappear down the drain for no gain.
Where do we send our contribution to this new voice???
John can take donations here http://johnansell.wordpress.com/2012/08/12/treatygate-time-to-expose-the-con/#comment-4379
Bank account: 12-3141-0106590-01
Reference: Colourblind State
Particulars: Your name
Thanks for whatever you can spare.
To be clear: I don't want a white New Zealand. As Bob Jones says in his story in this issue, I love the way the world is becoming more and more of a melting pot.
(And I'm gobsmacked Bob has confessed to enjoying a pop song!)
Maori are one of the flavours of humanity. But for the Griever Maori to pretend that they're a disproportionately important flavour is the height of arrogance, given the relative lack of achievements of Maori civilisation (most of them to do with violence).
Their leaders have done well pulling the wool over the eyes of the sheeple, but it's time they got the message that 'the game's up'.
Our politicians are too selfish and dishonest to change things og their own accord.
I won't say we need a party to 'keep the bastards honest', because if the bastards were honest we wouldn't be facing this creeping surrender of our country.
Unfortunately the only thing the bastards understand is fear. It's a sad indictment that our representatives may have to be bullied into running the country as a democracy.
At least it will transparently show how few of you there are for all the noise and whinging you make.
With the recent claims on water and even perhaps wind all Kiwis need to be concerned about where the Maori grievence agenda could take us as a country. When is enough enough? This is an issue of interest to all Kiwis. It seems to me that many Kiwis have no axe to grind with Maori other than to wish for them like other Kiwis whether of European, Asian or Islander decent to share EQUALLY in the benefits and opportunities that this country provides us. I have a very good elderly Maori friend in the SI that is now in his late 70's, who has very little formal education, has worked his butt off all his life, has raised 3 great young men, a grand father to a crowd of young ones, is financially independent of the state, is revered by his family and friends, a true leader of his people & who would never have a bar of any of the current Maori agendas in play around Wellington now days. Why? because my friend knows that he needed no more ownership of the water and the wind than I to have been successful. All he's needed was a free opportunity in a free country and he got that, embraced it and worked hard along with us all. Thank goodness we never had this nonsense in play when we built the Waitaki power projects, fantastic environmentally friendly projects that have served ALL kiwis so well for 30 years. Mr Ansell raises a valid point of national interest which should be debated.
Good work John.
The silent majority of Kiwis know this separatist appeasement path National has been going down with Key and Finlayson is not going to end well for future New Zealanders.
I shudder when I read the utter historical garbage trumped up by the Waitangi Tribunal and supported by media commentators who are too lazy or corrupted to publish the facts. More power to you.
Lovely, the next great white hope rises to gather and organize rednecks into an effective unit using a revamped "assimilation" policy for Maori. This may even work. Power & Privilege is maintained and mainstream taxpaying Pakeha lives happily ever after... that would make good reading.
You almost sound mad "assimilation of Maori" what are you talking about.
Interesting comment. Are you a beneficiary of the tax payers dollar by any chance?
So James, does this mean that anyone that disagrees is likely to be a beneficiary? You certainly don't know fair minded, eduicated New Zealanders if you think that.
John Ansell represents the true account of NZ history as it has been documented for almost 200 years. He stands against his fellow Kiwi being plundered by an Iwi elite and supported by quislings in return for power. If that makes him a redneck then the majority of Kiwis are just that and more power to them I say.
Look I have a small bit of Maori in me and I totally support Mr Ansells colour blind New Zealand.The Maori council and our political parties have been disgraceful and have really stepped over the line.
Claims on the water,wind and or the sun are just ridiculous, come on now that's not right.
It's almost as if we've lost the plot as a civilized country where nutty things are authorized.Claims of this nature just dont happen in other OECD developed countries,society would just fall apart.
Thanks. I'm relieved to say that a lot of Maori - the Achievers, not the Grievers - are fair-minded and know that equal rights is the only way to go.
But it's important to note this...
I'm not merely wanting to dump the majority view on the minority (which would be fair enough in a democracy, but a pretty cheap shot if our forebears were as bad as the Grievers say).
No, I want to make a moral case - that the history has been twisted, and that our British forebears were a tremendous force for good, very compassionate colonisers by the standards of the time.
This may come as a very wacky idea to PC people brainwashed by the authorised 'Treatygate' version of history preached in our schools and universities.
But the evidence is there for my claim, and I just need the budget to run an ad campaign to jolt the sheeple awake.
This effort by Ansell deserves the support of all forward-thinking New Zealanders who care more for the future of our country than just their own position and rewards.
liberte
Sounds good but why sit on the cross benches? Surely you hold national to ransom immediately after the election to effect policy change in this very area?
You're assuming National will win. I don't think even the Nats are assuming that.
No but I'm assuming they will get the most votes, and given they have the least number of natural coalition partners then it should give you some leverage if you can scramble 5% of the vote. Will you do away with the maori seats?
Politicians, by the very nature of Democracy, are vested in self interest in order to get elected by the people they chose to represent. It is the will of the people who decide - look at Labour bribes which wasted so much money but which got them reelected.
National needs to see how much bread is buttered and they will change their stance accordingly.
In a hearbeat, I'd say.
Mister Ansell is the same guy who formulated the Iwi/Kiwi campaign for National and the other Race based campaign for ACT? He should put his white hood away. The big issue with the 'claim' over water is the fact that everyone has been forced to use the wholly inappropriate English word 'property' when the issue for Maori is 'kaitiakitanga'. Water currently used by Govt. owned entities to produce power and profit for the whole country are to be sold off to a minority who will use a public good to make private profit ... It seems to me Maori are protecting us all. As for the 'false' history taught in school could Mr. Ansell enlighten us as to what that is. He seems to have made a lot of claims with little substance...
The issue for Maori is not 'kaitiakitanga', but 'cashitanga'.
Not 'mana', but 'money'.
Maori have an appalling track record of environmental management in New Zealand. Of our 40 species to go extinct, 34 disappeared under Maori stewardship.
You won't find the word 'kaitiakitanga' in the Treaty, but you will find 'taonga'.
And if you look up what 'taonga' meant in the only dictionary that had been published by 1840 (complied by Professor Lee of Cambridge University in 1820), you will see that it meant 'property procured by the spear'.
The linguistic consultant for that dictionary was Chief Hongi Hika, who was visiting England in search of muskets.
A chief's 'taonga' was his 'stuff'.
Not his language, not his river, not the wind, the sun, the stars or the moon, and not the electromagnetic spectrum.
It was anything that gave him a bit of an edge in his stone age world, where his property rights lasted until a rival cannibal dictator sprung from the bushes and butchered and ate him.
Another contentious word in the Treaty is the word 'their'.
Does any reasonable person believe that 'their land' meant the entire vast island (eg the South Island) on which a tiny tribe of no more than 2000 people were living in a dozen or so tiny coastal pockets?
Yet it is on that basis that Ngai Tahu were awarded $170 million, with a multimillion dollar topup coming soon.
This is the sort of substance my campaign will exploring and exposing. They will be hearing about the five full and final settlements that this one tribe, to use one example of many, has received.
To use another example, Taranaki, we will examine the claim that the British unleashed a 'holocaust' in that province, when the death toll at Parihaka was precisely zero.
But if Tariana Turia is talking holocausts, she might consider the genocide unleashed by two Taranaki tribes on the Moriori in the Chathams. And she might consider the barbarous murders of numerous innocent settler men, women and children.
So as to the offer of Maori to protect our water, I'm suggesting we pass on that.
Could you address my point about kaitiakitanga and it's ideal of guardianship rather than ownership? Also where do you stand on the transfer of a public good into private profit? If Maori can keep exploitation of water in the public realm all the better. Choosing Parihaka as your example is disingenuous as that was a single instance, you completely ignore the issues over land in the Taranaki and the conflicts that began in the Waitara and continued on to Parihaka. Do you have a comment on the thefts and rapes that occured at Parihaka? Would you like to comment on Chutes march across the Taranaki to New Plymouth? Several hundred undefended villages were destroyed, cattle confiscated or killed, and crops destroyed. How many Maori died as a result of this scorched earth policy is unknown. The Maori assault on the Chathams is well documented but was a result of a clash of cultures. Moriori refused to fight back and against a martial Maori and were considered worthless because of their pacifism. This is not an excuse but an explanation.
We all know that so-called guardianship is just another excuse to clip the ticket. To pacify the taniwha, just bribe the tribe - problem solved.
Well, it's just not good enough to invoke fairy tales for profit. We're all grown-ups here, even if some persist in behaving like boorish, lying, thieving, super-entitled, overgrown teenagers.
We have learned the hard way that you cannot trust the tribes not to keep finding news ways of claiming something for nothing.
How do you figure putting water into the care of iwi is "keeping it in the public realm"?
Iwi are private corporations, who got that way by conning millions out of appeaser goverments, ie us.
Parihaka? I've just had a Maori woman on my blog babbling that all the women and girls were raped. Absolute nonsense, and an example of Hitler's Big Lie Principle where they claim the complete opposite of the truth until it becomes embedded in the popular psyche as 'fact'.
"Several hundred undefended villages were destroyed..." Almost certainly another example of the same phenomenon.
I doubt whether there were several hundred villages in the whole of Taranaki.
Certainly this account indicates that Chute was dead right to pursue and harass the dreadful Hauhaus, with whom he was at war, and who had committed numerous atrocities: http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-GudRemi-t1-body1-d18.html
What you won't find here is evidence of the wholesale murders of innocent women and children, which was the Maori way - witness the cowardly attacks on the Gilfillan family, the Gascoigne family, the Lavin family, the Wilson family, the Biggs family...
Get my point?
And to excuse the Maori genocide in the Chathams as a culture clash is pathetic. Of course it was a culture clash. One side was peaceloving and the other side were brutal butchers. I know which side I think is worthless.
(I note one of the butcher tribes, Ngati Tama, received $20 million from the taxpayer in 'compensation', and promptly squandered the lot. I imagine the ghosts of the Moriori enjoyed that.)
It's well-known that the self-proclaimed prophet Te Whiti, of Parihaka fame, chose as his symbol of peace the white feather.
It's less well-known that he got it from the Moriori after his fellow Taranaki had nearly exterminated them.
John Ansell deserves my vote as the Quislings who are in power pander to the minority groups
There are none so blind as those who will not see. I've been posting evidence for a while on www.johnansell.wordpress.com and there's much more to come.
The evidence is everywhere, but of course none of it makes any difference to the wilfully blind.
I invite those of you with open minds to check it out.
It was inevitable that such a single focus party would spring up once people (not lawyers) felt that the Treaty was moving outside its reasonable boundaries.
I think that this current action on water will (and I have never been a republican) be a catalyst to New Zealand becoming a republic on the back of a constitution that represents all New Zealanders equally and will encompass and supersede all previous treaties and agreements.
It will be interesting to follow this new initiative to see how strong the people do feel about these issues.
Regards the constitutional review; get rid of the biased Maori leaning individuals on the review committee (it is already 'loaded' with the 'correct' individuals).as there will be but one result..the Treaty will be planted in to the 'new' constitution and at that point NZ will be on the 'slippery slope' to becoming a bannana republic. If anyone thinks the RMA is a hinderance to productivity and wealth creation, then 'you ain't seen nothing yet'. If you don't agree with that summary, then just cast your minds back on the vexatious round of 'claims' (totally too late..ie; after 1 October 2008) The Foreshore & Seabed; the water; now the wind... and Maori prattle on about the Taniwha; their spiritual presence; their 'life-blood'; ..all very nice, but in fact B**.L Sh*T.. Water and wind/air is also my life-blood..I love being beside a river myself and find peace there..What makes a Maori any more special than me as a Pakeha...and by the way, Maori are NOT indigenous we all sailed, paddled, whatever to this land !! The Maori thing is all about Money......Money for nothing; extortion; call it what you may. You cannot dress the grab up in any other way.
Certainly no-one actually died during the invasion of Parihaka but didn't almost 20 of the arrested ploughmen die while in custody... Never having been charged or tried in a court of law.
I know who did die: the Gilfillan family, the Gascoigne family, the Wilson family, the Biggs family, the Lavin family (whose three children were tossed in the air and impaled on Hauhau bayonets) and many other innocent settlers, shot, tomahawked and burnt and in some cases eaten by marauding Maori.
If people like Tariana Turia, Kerry Opae and the Waitangi Tribunal want to talk about holocausts in Taranaki, this is where they should start (just after they've dealth with the Moriori genocide.
Parihaka was an illegal occupation of confiscated Crown land, which the government had been patiently asking for back for fourteen years.
Every single event of the war period began with a Maori provocation of some kind, and usually followed a warning by the governor that rebelling against the Queen (in defiance of the Treaty) would result in the rebels' land being confiscated and occupied by people who could be relied upon to keep the peace.