Marlborough bio-energy entrepreneur Aquaflow Bionomic Corporation, has teamed up with a Chinese company Greenleaf Environmental of Sichuan.
The companies are investigating sites in China for the Blenheim-based company's patented approach to growing wild algae in sewage ponds to clean up the waste, and refine the algae for biodiesel.
"This is a significant breakthrough as Sichuan is a leading clean technology centre and we believe Aquaflow is the first company of its kind to move into the region," said Aquaflow director, Nick Gerritsen.
Greenleaf's engineering director William Gormley said the technology could, potentially clean up contaminated water, and produce "green" crude oil.
Mr Gerritsen said the level of interest was "mind boggling".
The company will sort through opportunities to set up the first series of pilot plants offshore.
Aquaflow started in 2005 with plans to produce biodiesel from algae.
The use of wild or naturally-occurring algae and its low cost made Aquaflow's process more economically viable than rival systems, Mr Gerritsen said.
The Aquaflow system could be added to existing sewage works and water treatment centres without the expense of building an intensive "bio-reactor" to grow the algae.
Continuously harvesting wild algae growing in wastewater would not compete with food crops or agricultural land.
The company said last year it was offering up to 60 million new shares at 50c each, in a bid to raise at least $20m.
It has also talked of starting a fundraising programme in Australia for the first of up to 16 pilot plants.
Comments
Would the people who write
Would the people who write these articles check their facts rather than rely on press releases from the company.
1. They do not grow algae - they harvest it from naturally occurring species present in the wastewater.
2. A few companies would be very interested in their 'patented' algae growing system - seeing as it is common practice in the wastewater industry and designs are knock offs from other companies. To say that its 'patented' is baulderdash...unless someone can post what the patent is - which should be common knowledge if its patented?
Aquaflow links with Chinese company
Yet another dubious press release from Nick Gerritsen. It’s amazing how this stuff gets into the media - no questions asked.
The facts are that the company does not have a commercially viable conversion process and never will. Its harvest system is the same as used in many places o/seas. It does not involve any enhancement of the algae’s growing conditions.
The patents they have applied for are patents for patents sake - so they can say that the company has patents when they try to get some misguided investor to dump more cash down the drain.
Aquaflow has spent $3-4 million and has nothing to show for it.
The company is out of money and has laid off most of its staff. It is living in hope that some misinformed delusional greeny investor will give them some cash to remain afloat.
Questions to ask Mr Gerritsen
Does its conversion plant work properly?
How many deadlines for suppling product or technology have they missed.
How many litres of fuel have been produced for the $3 million dollars?
Is their water treatment any different than off the shelf systems available worldwide?
How much energy is involved in harvesting the algae? (lots)
How much energy is involved in processing the algae sludge? (lots)
Does Aquaflow have a commercially viable and energy positive processing plant?
Where and how were the few milli-litres of the jet fuel samples you tout about made?
Please journalists ask some questions.
Post new comment