Are beautiful people more intelligent as well?
A controversial scientist argues that a widely held perception that physically attractive people are more competent and intelligent is actually based on fact.
London School of Economics evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa blogs on Psychology Today that a large number of experiments over the years have shown people tend to rate attractive others as more intelligent and competent than unattractive others.
However, Mr Kanazawa argues that the evidence suggests concerns for mate selection isn’t the reason people think that beautiful people are more intelligent.
This is because of two reasons: children at kindergarten share the perception that beautiful people are more intelligent (and they aren’t concerned with mate selection), while more importantly among adults, the common perception holds both within and between the sexes.
Since most people are heterosexual, these two pieces of evidence suggest that there is more going on than concerns of mate selection.
Many sociologists and social psychologists are convinced that “beauty is only skin-deep,” and dismiss this widespread perception as “bias,” stereotype,” or “halo effect,” implicitly assuming that the perception is not accurate with no factual basis.
Mr Kanazawa refers to the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) which routinely measures the intelligence and physical attractiveness of its respondents.
During the 2000-2001 survey respondents took an IQ test called the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, before their physical attractiveness was measured by an objective interviewer (unaware of their IQ test scores) on a five point scale where 1 = very unattractive, through to 5 = very attractive.
The respondents were a nationally representative sample of just over fifteen thousand Americans with a mean age of 22.

The graph above shows a clear relationship between physical attractiveness and intelligence. The mean IQ is 94.2 for those rated “very unattractive,” through to an IQ of 100.7 for those rated “very attractive.” Mr Kanazawa argues that partly because of the large sample size, the association is highly statistically significant.


The graphs show the general positive association holds for both sexes with “very attractive” women more intelligent than “very unattractive” women by about 6 IQ points on average. For “very attractive” men, they are more intelligent than “very unattractive” men by about 8 IQ points on average.
Professor Kanazawa argues that it appears that the “stereotype” of beautiful people being more intelligent appears to be true empirically, “just as virtually all “stereotypes” are”.
The answer to the question this finding throws up - why are beautiful people more intelligent? Will be answered in his next post, promises Mr Kanazawa.
Satoshi Kanazawa is the co-author (with the late Alan S. Miller) of Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters (Perigee, 2007).
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions9
Beauty IS only skin deep, but ugly goes right to the bone!!!
Does this explain why not many politicians are beautiful people?
Hasn't seen Comrade Helen then! hahahha
Statistical significance aside, I'm guessing Mr Kanazawa didn't take too long reflecting on the beauty of Stephen Hawking or the genius of Paris Hilton...
I wouldn't mind betting that Paris would score quite well in an IQ test - more than can be said for anyone who watches her TV programes & buys her products. She knows the money is in the dumass end of the market when it comes to marketing.
This is done by one interviewer only!! Also why is this person an interviewer? Physical attractiveness should be measured by only looking at the person not interviewing them. what a crap "Scientific" study!
Could it be that more attractive people tend to be given more opportunities, more attention, and more encouragement, thus have more opportunity and more confidence to take on challenges that develop their intelligence? I believe social factors have much more impact on intelligence differentials rather than our natural genetic make up.
If we think about it for a moment it should come as no surprise: less intelligent women will most likely have limited high-paying job opportunities and hence won't have the financial ability to look after themselves, what with gym memberships and quality food being so expensive these days.
Then there is the eugenic effect of smart men becoming rich due to their higher than average mental abilities and beautiful women being attracted to these men due to their ability to provide for them and all their worldly desires.
MH should look again at the word "interviewer", which implies, by its construction, one person viewing another; not "interrogator". Who is being unscientific now?
What ridiculous scholarship. An IQ of 100 is average, not intelligent at all and 92 is intellectually handicapped. This is actually a poll on whether mentally handicapped people are attractive, not intelligent ones. One wonders if the researcher is 'attractive' or not.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below