Australia gives us a good picture of what NZ might be facing if we had continued with massing increases in spending, as proposed by Labour.
Australia, like NZ once did, faces a structural or permanent deficit. Turning it around will not be a quick thing. An Audit Commission has just identified 86 ways to reduce spending by $70 billion a year – which would get the Government back into surplus by 2023.
The recommendations are large, and many will not be politically palatable. They include:
- End of universal health care and a $15 charge for doctors visits
- Cutting 15,000 public service jobs and selling state-owned assets
- Slower rollout of the NDIS and raising the pension age to 70, while including the family home in means testing for the aged pension.
- Abolish seven Commonwealth agencies, merge 35 and privatise nine
- Reject paid parental leave in favour of focusing on child care
- Strip the dole from young unemployed people who don’t move to areas with jobs and freeze the minimum wage for 10 years
As I said, some quite unpalatable. But both the Government and the Opposition will have to produce their own policies on how to get back into surplus.
Meanwhile in NZ, we will hopefully have a Budget in three weeks showing a return to surplus next year.
Political commentator David Farrar posts at Kiwiblog.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- Mark Weldon couldn't hack the pressure, says Bill Ralston
- TEU’s Sandra Grey and NZ Initiative's Oliver Hartwich on whether the UoA should be a funder or member of the NZ Initiative
- Capital Economics's Paul Dales says the RBA and the RBNZ are in very similar positions
- ANZ Bank CEO David Hisco on the forces behind his bank's profit and margin slide
- Houzz's Jason Chuck says there was plenty of demand in New Zealand for Houzz