Billions more to be made from pasture farming
Billions of dollars could be added to farmers’ profits if they focused more on pasture renewal, a new study reveals.
The Pasture Renewal Charitable Trust this week suggested a switch in focus from animal improvements to pasture development was required to increase farm productivity.
The trust commissioned Wellington-based company BERL (Business and Economic Research Ltd) to complete an economic analysis of the value of pasture to New Zealand’s economy.
BERL determined that pasture was worth $20.5 billion to New Zealand’s gross domestic product (12.1% of GDP) and $10.2 billion to producers at the farm gate.
Trust chairman Murray Willocks told NBR that the low cost of animal feed is New Zealand’s economic edge, and it could be expanded on to the tune of billions of extra dollars each year.
“All our dairying and beef and sheep farming operations are dependent on our pastures,” Mr Willocks said.
“As we look to economic growth, we should look at investment in pasture as a key contributor.”
Pasture renewal rates are the key. Mr Willocks said sheep and beef farms should renew 8% each year, while dairy farms should be looking at 12%.
BERL’s report determined these rates of pasture renewal would add $1.6 billion of value at the farm gate and about $3.1 billion to GDP.
In addition, the report suggested more than 44,000 jobs would be created as result of the production boost.
“Looking at pasture-based products, the largest contributor to farm gate values was the dairy industry,” the report stated.
In the June 2007 year dairy was worth $6.6 billion, or 65% of the total value of pasture based products.
“Depending on the level of pasture renewal response, farm gate values for sheep and beef farms could increased from 8-27% and from 6-25% for dairy farms.
“When considering rhe effect that the pastoral sector has on related industries, such as agricultural services and the food processing industry, as well as the additional spending generated by salaries and wages paid by farmers, the GDP of pasture-based products is much higher,” the report writers explained.
“To put this in context, it would require approximately 460,000 international tourists additional to the present 2.4 million to generate this level of additional expenditure for the tourism industry.”
Mr Willocks said the report would be used to target policy and decision makers rather than farmers directly.
Current annual pasture renewal rates are estimated at about 2% for sheep and beef farms and 6.1% for dairy farms.
Mr Willocks said the challenge was to increase overall pasture production through the genetic gains made in the breeding of both ryegrass and white clover cultivars coupled with improved pasture management.
Earlier this year both New Zealand’s major fertiliser companies, Ravensdown and Ballance Agri-Nutrients reported falling rates of application, which would result in lost production.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions8
You can bet your $3.1 billion GDP that the Greens and other ideologically deluded, and scientifically ignorant political pressure groups will go out of their way to ensure that such pasture improvement never happens.
Look at their stance on GM products for an example.
Ignorance is bliss, and the economy suffers.
The production costs of a kg of Milksolids at $3.60/kg for pasture and $5.45/kg from high-input feeds and cereals also shows the graphic affect the on-farm practice can specfic farm profitability. Happy Farming!
Just about every townie hates farmers, so why should farmers bother to work twice as hard to get twice the grief from the "chip on the shoulder" townies. Farmers pay 3-4 times more rates and twice as much ACC as anyone else. Now they have to be the only farmers on the planet to pay an emissions tax. Now you want more blood out of their bodies. If the government bring in land taxes there WILL be riots. Farmers have had enough.
"Farm Gate Returns" are great, how about a paper that shows actual net profit from pasture renewal not Gross income.
What a surprise, among the principle sponsers of The Pasture Renewal Charitable Trust, are the Seed Companies.
And the research they paid for suggests more money spent on pasture renewal, isn't the world full of coincidences?
If all that poison super phosphate wasn't applied the pasture wouldn't need regenerstion
Farmers....remember the massive advertising campaign years ago for Ellett ryegrass and the transformation this was going to bring to pasture production.
The scientists had convinced farmers of big dry matter increases but neglected to inform the high endophyte levels contained within for control of argentine stem weevil.
These high levels gave stock a sickness with the same symptoms as grass staggers and the farmer a tiresome job of cleaning up the rear end.
Remember regrassing the regrass and the huge cost merely to get back to previous pasture. Farmers cynical replies to this type of article are well founded from historic events and as for the perceived GDP increase you can guarantee that farmers who produce it will never receive it.
It always amazes me how concerned the people who own no land nor produce any crops can become in deciding the use of land belonging to others.
New Zealand political employees have taken the attitude that New Zealand and all that is in it and surrounds it and flies over it, belongs to them. Servants of the people have become devine in their right to pass judgment on and dispose of citizens property and now make more laws than God Almighty.
Farmers and other landowners did not steal their land or take it by force from the Maoris. They purchased it with the help of banks or with their own hard earned cash. Rightly therefore it belongs to them and not any government employee or servant of the British Crown.
National parks are already available for the unoposessing who need a break from the tedium of city life. Those areas so set aside for the preservation of nature are the only legitimate concern of Government.
Land taxes are a political crime against property owners. All non specific taxes not agreed by referendum are actually a form of extortion and have nothing to do with any Democratic process nor are they based on just principles..
Those currently and previously inhabiting the Beehive in Wellington had better get a grip on the fact that the citizens of New zealand , are not , and never have been, revenue assets or resources living their lives for the benefit of the parasitic community.
Enough is already more than enough.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below