BUDGET 2012: Tax changes at a glance - tightening the screws
More funding for Inland Revenue
Today’s budget provides a tick of confidence for the Inland Revenue with an extra $78.4m of funding over the next four years to be used to extend its successful tax compliance activities in dealing with the hidden economy, debt collection and taxpayers who have not filed their returns.
This funding is in addition to the $119.3 million awarded to IRD in the 2010 Budget and the government has acknowledged the encouraging return that has already been seen on that earlier investment. The extra compliance activities in this Budget are estimated to have a net positive impact of $345.4m over the next four years.
Clearly, the government wishes to tighten the screws a little further and in doing so is sending a signal to the majority of taxpayers who already meet their tax obligations voluntarily that it will not turn a blind eye to those ripping off and undermining the integrity of the tax system.
Measures to raise revenue and increase fairness
Three tax areas have been targeted for change:
Assets that are partly used for private purposes and partly for income producing purposes will be subject to tighter restrictions on the deductibility of costs.
These measures are specifically targeted at taxpayers who are offsetting holding costs on assets such as holiday homes, planes, and boats.
Under current rules the costs associated with these assets are tax deductible against income derived from renting the assets out and often the net result is a tax loss which is offset against other income.
Today’s announcements will limit the deductions available for these types of assets and these changes are expected to save $109m in revenue over four years. The changes will also improve the perceived fairness of the tax system.
Changes to the livestock valuation rules to prevent farmers who change valuation schemes from getting an unintended tax break. This change is expected to prevent a $184m fall in revenue over the next four years.
Removing a range of tax credits including the childcare and housekeeper tax credits, the under $9880 tax credit as well as that for the active income of children.
These credits are no longer seen as fit for purpose due to other initiatives such as working for families and the 20 hours per week childcare subsidy. The removal of these tax credits will save $117m over the next 4 years.
Tobacco excise to rise 10% per annum
Excise tax on tobacco will rise 10% on 1 January each year for the next 4 years. This will be in addition to any inflation adjustment to the excise tax and is also in addition to the 40% increase in excise since April 2010.
These measures are aimed at improving the health of New Zealanders and reducing the long-term burden on the health system and to assist in the Government’s goal of making New Zealand smoke free by 2025.
KiwiSaver changes
KiwiSaver fund managers will be required to report their performance and returns including their fees and costs via a standardised report on their websites. This will assist investors to make investment judgements and comparisons between funds
The government will also review the rules and arrangements of KiwiSaver default providers. Currently there are 500,000 New Zealanders with default funds.
This review is designed to ensure the best results can be achieved for investors in default funds and this review will occur before the term of the six current default providers ends at June 30, 2014.
Government’s plan to look at auto enrolment for KiwiSaver (being the automatic enrolment of workers not already in KiwiSaver) will be deferred until such time that sufficient surpluses exist to fund the estimated $514m four-year cost.
The employee minimum contribution to KiwiSaver will increase to 3% (from 2%) at 1 April 2013 as previously announced in 2011 Budget changes.
Student Loans
Student Loan repayment rates for all New Zealand based borrowers will increase from 10 cents to 12 cents in the dollar (where income is over the repayment threshold). This will save $184.2m over 4 years.
The definition of income for student loan repayment purposes will be broadened, meaning more repayments will arise. This will save $3.1m over four years.
The voluntary repayment bonus will be removed, saving $43.5m in a four-year period.
Inland Revenue and Customs will have new information matching procedures to identify defaulting borrowers.
Students will be limited on the number of courses which they can borrow for in one year.
Parental income thresholds will be maintained at current rates until 31 March 2016, saving $12.7m over four years.
Eligibility for student allowances will be removed for postgraduate study, saving $33m, also over four years.
Innovation
There are no tax incentive announcements on innovation, science and research.
However, direct funding has been allocated to these areas on a range of fronts including $159m to strengthen tertiary education of which $42m is allocated engineering, $17m for science, and a further $100m towards the $200m already allocated to the Performance-Based Research fund.
Murray Brewer is a tax partner at Grant Thornton. Email murray.brewer@nz.gt.com.
























Comments and questions15
Very interesting to read the line in this article, "Inland Revenue and Customs will have new information matching procedures to identify defaulting borrowers".
The US is contemplating a law denying issue or canceling the passport of anyone accused of owing more than $50,000 in taxes with the expectation that other "developed" nations especially Europe, Canada, and Australia will follow suit.
Looks like NZ is positioning itself to do the same. The real worry is the word "accused".
what a wonderful new-world.
Student loan borrowers should not be allowed to leave the country unless they have an offical letter from the IRD that states a payment plan is in progress, something easily done through data sharing between IRD and Customs. A graduate can only go overseas if s/he has a secure job to pay back the debt. S/he can't do the 5-10 year back packer trip after borrowing from the NZ taxpayer. Same should apply to people that own more than $50k in taxes.
I think your idea is pretty fair and reasonable (I'm a student loan borrower living overseas)
One of the main issues that needs to be fixed is the cap they place on payments (max $3500 NZD p.a if your loan is over $35k) but in my case, this is less than the interest I am charged.
I personally make significantly higher payments than required (and oddly get the 10% bonus), but I’m sure there are many that don’t.
You know what would be a better idea? No government backed student loans, private sector loans only that way only degrees that make financial reason will be funded and banks,families,communities will have to take the risk.
BL, pleased to others are thinking along similar lines.
Would extend this much further into the legal system to get fines repaid at the airport (got your Visa handy mate, otherwise call a friend, or call a taxis home).
Students with loans can leave provided someone (perhaps family) guarantees repayment over time with interest, perhaps allow the debt to stand as first call on Estates.
For those students who stay, and are in desired fields (teaching, engineers, nurses, doctors etc) they can repay say 50% of their loan just by working and paying PAYE. A gift, 10% attributed each year in appropriate field, that way the NZ economy gains with graduates staying and working and the student gets 1/2 their loan paid for them, they just have to pay the balance.
Given we write off 40% already, it's not a big cost but the economic benefit is huge.
Any way BL I am in your camp
increasing IRD funding it probably one of the best investments the gov can make in terms of ROI. a few more mill spent chasing tax dodgers will return tens of mill in tax revenue.
Glad to see your an honest student who gives a damn about the future of their country, would be good if there were a few more.
an excellent budget
Quite interesting the government is wanting to improve the health of NZers and increase tax on tobacco. This is fine were they also targeting the biggest burden on the health system which is obesity related disease. Why not tax unhealthy food options? With this extra cash they can then increase health funding while also subsidizing the cost of healthy foods. Or is this to nanny state?
I do not think that Bill English will ever forgive those who ended his hopeless leadership. We are forever provided with plans to hurt the well-off, obviously watered down by the Cabinet.
The last one leaving for OZ please switch off the lights.
I dont like removing tax credits for kids and low income earners. They are already paid next to nothing.
How about decreasing expenditure instead?
Making birth control compulsory for anyone on welfare would be a good start.
#14 Ken - Perhaps it's a shame the state didn't start with your parents. Careful there, your quasi-facism is showing.