Member log in

BUDGET 2014: Solving the housing shortage equation

Housing issues will be closely monitored in this year’s budget and the general election in September. 

Earlier this month, Prime Minister John Key said there would be no “lolly scramble,” prompting Labour leader David Cunliffe to say the government was doing nothing to fix underlying problems in the economy.

Mr Cunliffe at the time declined to say how a Labour-led government might increase spending, on the basis of not being privy to the same level of economic information as the government.

But there is some information all of us – from aspiring ministers of finance, market observers, property developers, homeowners and renters who would like to be homeowners – have access to. We all know mortgage interest rates are on the rise and could reach the pre-global financial crisis rates of 8% over the next two years.

The Reserve Banks’ increase in the official cash rate last month was significant, if only for the fact it was the first increase since March 2011, a month after the Christchurch earthquakes.

At 8.25% in July 2007, the rate’s descent over the subsequent seven years coincided with a period of reduced building consents. But just because we were building fewer houses, did not mean we were having fewer babies nor were there fewer people migrating to New Zealand. There was also the devastating series of earthquakes in the Canterbury region that led to the demolition of about 8000 houses.

Simply put: The cumulative effect has been more people plus fewer houses, equalling a housing shortage. So, what next?

Several political parties have once again proposed a capital gains tax on property and a restriction on foreign ownership of houses. But these approaches fail to address overall population growth, increased migration and trends to smaller housing.

Australia’s restriction on foreign ownership to new builds was supposed to reduce demand and, as a consequence, the rate of price rises for existing houses. But house prices in Sydney are still rising at 10% a year and the government there is now undertaking an inquiry into the effect foreign ownership has on housing affordability.

Any political response to New Zealand’s situation should resist the temptation to make things complicated and acknowledge it is simply a case of supply and demand. 

On this basis, the government and its post-election successor would do well to ensure local authority processes such as building consents are as efficient as possible so the housing shortage can be rectified sooner rather than later. 

With more building consents issued in the year to January 2014 than any 12-month period since late 2007, any risk of bottlenecks needs to be addressed. Improved efficiencies in consent application through to build completion need to be identified.

These are positive signs already. The government’s Housing Accord with Auckland Council has seen 22 special housing areas created since October 2013 and almost 3600 new sections and consents created. 

But there can be no resting on laurels. More than 90% of New Zealand businesses are small-to-medium enterprises of up to 20 employees. 

Typically, they are funded by the equity in the family home. Unless housing becomes more affordable, it will be more than just the Kiwi dream of owning a place to call your own facing extinction.

Matt Parkinson is a partner, privately held business, at Grant Thornton 

Comments and questions
2

We always talk of the housing shortage and our the rising price of housing in general NZ wide terms. But almost every example is in very specific suburbs in Auckland.

My question is, do we just have a shortage in Auckland, and is it simply because that it's where the job growth is and so people flock to the jobs.

Perhaps we need a national urban planning function to start by moving jobs around out of the major cities, thus helping to solve the housing and transportation issues.

Parker's idea of deposit/loan ratio applying only to areas where there is a problem (namely AKL) is the most sensible thing I've heard in years, why should the good folk of Waipukurau be a slave to the housing issues of Auckland? The truth is the vast majority of home owners will not tolerate any great slide in the value of their homes - that is a real political problem which is a hard one to fix, who will take the hit?