Member log in

Business to government: get on with it

OPENING SALVO

Thursday’s New Zealand Herald Mood of the Boardroom report sent a clear message to just get on with it.

The usual issues were at the fore. Business leaders overwhelmingly think much more must be done to develop the mining industry, with 75% wanting to include the conservation estate.  Over 90% believe John Key needs to break his promise on superannuation entitlements.

The Resource Management Act – which all governments promise to fix but never do – was clearly identified as needing wholesale reform.  The same was true of incompetent local councils and their ever-increasing powers.

Alarmingly, 80% said the government has failed to articulate its economic plan and half don’t think it has one beyond its obviously doomed target of returning to surplus in 2014/15.

Most gut-wrenching is that only 20% of business leaders believe their own children will choose to make New Zealand their home. Half are sure New Zealand will fail to reach its potential.

Underpinning the responses, is that while business leaders continue to like Mr Key and believe he is far better than the Labour/Green alternative, patience with his government is running out.

Rangatira Investments chief executive Ian Frame put it most bluntly: ‘‘Because of MMP, John Key probably won’t be in power beyond 2014, so the target [for the government’s ‘to do’ list] needs to be 2014, not 2017.”

Last chance
Mr Frame would be quite wrong if he is saying he doesn’t believe Mr Key will secure a third term.

Winston Peters will never agree to be the third wheel in a Labour/Green coalition. As long as Mr Key keeps National’s support above 40%, and the MMP threshold is reduced to 4%, he can probably take his third term for granted, relying on the support of NZ First and Colin Craig’s new Conservative Party.  He could be assured of joining the three-term club alongside Sir Robert Muldoon, Jim Bolger and Helen Clark.

But ,if Mr Frame’s comment was pointing out that Mr Key would have no power under such a scenario, he would be quite right.

Like the Bolger/Peters and Clark/Peters governments before it, the third term National/NZ First/Conservative government will of course be a fiasco and nothing will be achieved.

Any SOE share issues that have not been completed before the next election will have to be cancelled and progress on managing superannuation and healthcare costs will be impossible.

If Mr Key and finance minister Bill English want to have any enduring legacy at all, the time for them to act boldly and decisively is right now.

The mood of the boardroom survey outlines a reasonable agenda they could follow.

Socialist Norway
Top of the list must surely be natural resources and, to its credit, the government began paving the way for a renewed effort on mining at its party conference last weekend.

It would be simply sinful to leave in the ground and under the waters many hundreds of billions of dollars of oil, gas and minerals that would otherwise transform New Zealand into one of the richest countries in the world, fund essential infrastructure and social services, and prevent the children of 80% of business leaders from leaving New Zealand.

Half the business leaders even support the somewhat socialist Norwegian model, under which that country has poured the surplus wealth from oil exploration into its global and domestic government pension funds.

The country of five million people now has approximately $NZ30 billion in its domestic fund, or $6000 per Norwegian.

The country of 5 million people now has approximately NZ$730 billion in its global fund, or around $146,000 per Norwegian, and about another NZ$30 billion in its domestic fund, or $6000 per Norwegian. The value of the funds may exceed $NZ4 trillion by 2030 or $NZ800,000 per Norwegian.

Norway also has a very strong tourism industry, based on an appropriately politically-correct eco-proposition, which generates roughly the same percentage of GDP as New Zealand tourism does for this country.

Our own former prime minister, Helen Clark, famously used to go to northern Norway to telemark in the dark rather than enjoy the New Zealand summer.

It seems that Norway’s commitment to getting rich out of oil exploration has done nothing to hurt its eco-tourism industry or its reputation for having a beautiful, untouched natural environment.

Remember that, next time you hear Forest & Bird, Nick Smith, the Green Party or Greenpeace prattling on about the risk to New Zealand’s clean and green reputation.

Remember it also when you hear one of Mr Key’s ministers talking about “striking the right balance” between mining and tourism.

There is no balance to be struck between mining and tourism. You just do both. It would take an awful lot of eco-kayaking adventures in the Catlins to make up for leaving perhaps $NZ1 trillion of New Zealand oil, gas and minerals under the ground and sea.

There are now only 862 days until the last realistic date for the next general election.  It is an election Mr Key will almost certainly win but then find himself without power.

The message from the business community is that he should make these next 862 days count.

Disclosure: Matthew Hooton’s public relations firm, Exceltium, has clients in both the minerals and eco-tourism sectors.

More by Matthew Hooton

Comments and questions
13

Apart from superannuation, the key government is finally on track for the other main issues.

I like many have been critical of the key government in its first term and early stages of the second term. However the effects of the meltdown in europe and needing to be well positioned to weather any future storm blowing from that direction and the huge cost and miniterial energy associated with the Christchurch earthquakes, they are now well on track to delivering what we all expected when we voted them in.

The only thing John Key needs to do is man up on the Superannuation issue, admit he was wrong and move on - if he does that he will gain so much respect and political mileage. And if he does that he will close the small gain labour is building in the polls - if he doesn't Labour will be in the high 30%'s before too long.

And Key and Bill English also need to stand firm on asset sales and have alternatives if maori stall the SOE sell downs or they will not ballance the books and be in real trouble

It is all quite staright forward if they are staunch and have the balls to follow through.

Key may well be able to keep his promises and the superannauation may well be affordable if NZ was to go hard to target the 100 million plus young unemployed in Europe - and change the demographic profile of the country in one big hit.

Bringing them in to help rebuild Chch into a modern city would be a good start - see this blog.....!!!

http://christchurchsupercity.wordpress.com/2012/07/24/immigration-from-europe-to-fill-the-new-city-8/

Can't understand why the Business leaders aren't aware of the present National Governments long term PLANS. I have certainly had no trouble finding and understanding where National wishes to position NZ, such that the sons and daughters of not only Business Leaders, but all NZ'ers will have a future in NZ.This is a vastly different future to that which Parker is planning for when he rolls Shearer next year, a possibility, regardless of the recent labour conference change of rules.
The information is out there, if one looks; BUT you are unlikely to find it headlined in the written, or voice media. They are too Socialist.
Perhaps the Business Leaders should step out of the Cocktail circuit, and visit their local National Party office for a briefing; or if they wish have both, hold the Chardonnay glass in the left hand, and lookup the National website using the Right hand.

All good stuff-as some of us have been saying for some time now!
Just needs more positive action from our government
Willie Getonwithit

Mining/oil - the Nats still don't get it that most of the public want effective environmental protection and regulation; not standards less than those which led to the Exxon Valdez and Gulf of Mexico/Florida disasters.

Ensure modern international regulatory standards are met, and a majority of the public would support the developments.

Mining and oil exploration has continued under modern regulatory regimes elsewhere in the world. Why do we need so much lower standards here when we have potentially so much more to lose environmentally?

I think you are optimistic. A majority of the public are simply ignorant and stupid and have bought the "no mining, no drilling, no exploring" slogans with as little thought as they have with the "no asset sales" dog whistle.

And the MSM support them with appropriate nonsense.

Alan - that is very dangerous attitude to have towards the public or for business to have to customers. It is predicated on an arrogant contempt, founded on a certainty of your righteousness, As such, it is likely to lead to the very over-reaction you reject.

I have greater faith in the ability of leadership and dialogue to achieve sensible change.

No it isn't. It is founded on the observation that not a single argument put forward in support of those positions withstands a microsecond of informed analysis.

If you think otherwise, produce one.

Alan Wilkinson for Prime Minister 2014!

I.have had a gutsful of key and his misfits,my four kids have been in aus for years,I said some time ago to my kids move on as this country will never get of the ground,it will stay stagnant till 2020 and then it will be a struggle,governments haven't got balls to make the tough moves all they are worried about is about votes,people on benefits should not be able to vote,they contribute zero to the tax take,sick of paying them to do zero.

I have met only one person who believes New Zealand should forego opportunities to win and export our mineral wealth. To my great surprise, this objector was under the impression that mining could occupy up to 50% of the land area of the country!

We should ask objectors whether they would really feel threatened if mineral production were restricted to the most prospective 0.00001% of conservation land.

I say cut off the imports of oil to New Zealand. The less informed will realise that if we cant take oil from our wells, then we shouldnt be so biased to think we can take it from elsewhere in the World.. Why dont we shut down the Hydro power schemes, to protect the water rights...no more tele, no more mobile phone operations, heating, warm beer, and of course we wont be able to operate the WINZ ATM machines to dispense dole money. Tell the Kiwis in Aussie to stay there, keep digging minerals in Aussie, because Kiwis are just too uninformed to understand that development of these very industries will allow people to move back to Rural areas, and save Auckland the need to build more houses,roads, bridges and train systems. Remember when NZ had rural lifestyles, family, sports clubs, schools and Auckland was simply a place you passed through on your way to catch a flight.

If business leaders are pessimistic now wait till the depression strikes,no amount of mining will save us.