Member log in

Business supports partial privatisation of state assets

Business leaders are optimistic that a government signal of plans to sell shares in several state-owned enterprises, while keeping a control of them, will be acceptable to voters.

Prime Minister John Key said the Government has asked Treasury for advice on extending Air New Zealand's mixed ownership model to Mighty River Power, Meridian, Genesis and Solid Energy.

Advice has also been sought on reducing the Crown's 74.69 percent shareholding in Air New Zealand, while still maintaining a majority stake.

Business leaders today talked about the difference between partial privatisations and the privatisation of state business in the 1980s and 1990s. Mr Key said his Government was "interested in what works, not in following any particular ideology".

With broad public support and constructive participation by other political parties the policy had the potential to achieve widespread acceptance, Business New Zealand chief executive Phil O'Reilly said.

Business Roundtable executive director Roger Kerr said New Zealand governments were spooked by the issue of privatisation.

The roundtable has argued that there are myths about the 30 or so privatisations in the 1980s and 1990s and the country has moved in an opposite policy direction by buying back rail and Air NZ and starting Kiwibank.

He said the Government move was a step in the right direction but there were issues with partial ownership.

"All the economic research indicates that privately owned business on average outperform publicly owned ones. But partially owned state-owned enterprises can still be subject to political interference and the results are not as clear," he said.

Employment and Manufacturers Association chief executive Alasdair Thompson said it was the opposite of selling the family silver.

"This is about realising the value from part of certain state assets and using the funds released to invest in even more valuable state assets."

Mr O'Reilly said that allowing New Zealanders to invest directly in a changed mix of state-owned assets was a policy that was both progressive and moderate.

"Broadening the pool of investment opportunities for New Zealand families is a key step towards a more vibrant economy.

"Greater involvement by more stakeholders also fosters accountability and better performance. "

Meridian Energy today noted the Prime Minister's speech in a note to the NZX under the code for listed debt instruments.

"As with any company Meridian will continue to be guided by its shareholders expectations for the company," Meridian said.

Solid Energy chairman John Palmer last year raised the issue of partial privatisation but was criticised by Energy Minister Gerry Brownlee for over-stepping the mark.

Mr Palmer, who is also chairman of Air NZ, argued that Solid Energy's situation was vastly different to the emotional discussion surrounding Kiwibank, and he talked about the merits of Air NZ's ownership structure. The airline is listed on the sharemarket.

The National government has made it clear that it will not sell state assets in its first term and will signal any intention in election policy.

Mr Palmer said there should be majority ownership of Solid Energy because it had some key national assets. The sale of new shares in the coal miner did not require the sale of the Government's existing stake but would dilute it.

The Crown's commercial portfolio contains almost $95 billion of assets, of which $55b is in commercially focused companies and $40b in investment funds, according to Treasury.

Comments and questions
10

Interesting.

I just received an OIA reply from Tim Groser, Minister of Trade, dated 26 January 2011:

I had asked for:

"1) Copies of all/any 'cost-benefit analyses', since the introduction of the 'neo-liberal' / free market reforms in troduced in New Zealand by the 1984 - 1987 Labour Governments (and continued by National Governments) which provide the facts and evidence that prove that private procurement of public services once provided 'in-house' by central and local government, is a more 'cost-effective use of public monies for the public majority."

ANSWER: "I am not aware of any overarching work that provides this type of cost-benefit analysis. ......"

Yep folks - 'public is bad - private is good' appears to have just been based on mantra.

You ask for the FACTS to prove it worked for the benefit of the public majority - and look what you get?

Nothing.

Wonder if Roger Kerr has a neat little summary of the legislative changes that the Business Round Table was able to effect through their lobbying and involvement at the 'policy' level?

Which of course, was carried out in the 'national interest'.

yeah right.

:)

Penny Bright
Media Spokesperson
Water Pressure Group
Judicially recognised 'Public Watchdog' on Metrowater, water and
Auckland
regional governance matters.

"Anti-corruption campaigner".
Attendee: Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference 2009
Attendee: Transparency International 14th Anti-Corruption Conference
2010

Auckland Mayoral candidate 2010
Independent candidate Botany by-election 2011

http://waterpressure.wordpress.com

you really challenge the old saying "no such thing as a dumb question". Are you surprised about the answer. I asked my plumber to describe how the hubble telescope worked, and he had no idea.

Water Pressure Group?
Is that longhand for "Drips"?

In response to R.McLeod | Wednesday, January 26, 2011 - 5:21pm

R.Mcleod

"you really challenge the old saying "no such thing as a dumb question".

Are you surprised about the answer. I asked my plumber to describe how the hubble telescope worked, and he had no idea. ..."

Don't quite understand your analogy?

I would have thought there was a big difference between asking a plumber and asking a Minister of the Crown (with access to significant numbers of staff /researchers/ 'spin doctors'?

I think it was a very pertinent question.

Why are we continuing to go down the same 'privatisation' path when there are no facts or evidence provided which prove private provision of formally public services, is 'cost-effective' for the public majority?

Unless, of course, you're one of those with a financial interest in private procurement - or would like to have?

:)

Penny Bright
Media Spokesperson
Water Pressure Group
Judicially recognised 'Public Watchdog' on Metrowater, water and
Auckland
regional governance matters.

"Anti-corruption campaigner".
Attendee: Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference 2009
Attendee: Transparency International 14th Anti-Corruption Conference
2010

Auckland Mayoral candidate 2010
Independent candidate Botany by-election 2011

http://waterpressure.wordpress.com

In response to Julian Clarke | Wednesday, January 26, 2011 - 5:46pm

Julian Clarke | Wednesday, January 26, 2011 - 5:46pm Water Pressure Group? Is that longhand for "Drips"?

Beware!

Persistent 'dripping water' can wear away stone......................

:)

Penny Bright
Media Spokesperson
Water Pressure Group
Judicially recognised 'Public Watchdog' on Metrowater, water and
Auckland
regional governance matters.

"Anti-corruption campaigner".
Attendee: Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference 2009
Attendee: Transparency International 14th Anti-Corruption Conference
2010

Auckland Mayoral candidate 2010
Independent candidate Botany by-election 2011

http://waterpressure.wordpress.com

In response to Penny Bright | Wednesday, January 26, 2011 - 6:22pm

Dripping water ? Penny, you are slowly driving us all insane with the stress of water dripping on a part of the forehead for a very long time ie Chinese water torture !

Surely Govy should sell completely out of Air NZ whilst it is srill worth something. Warren Buffett , the worlds most successful investor ever, said never buy airline shares . Is this gojng to continue to be the plaything for Weldon , Key and Fyfe.?

Surely Govy should sell completely out of Air NZ whilst it is srill worth something. Warren Buffett , the worlds most successful investor ever, said never buy airline shares . Is this gojng to continue to be the plaything for Weldon , Key and Fyfe.?

Reply; Yes unfortunately nobody is stupid enought to invest in an airline servicing the end of the world so the govt is needed to subsidise this route to enable primary producers and tourism operators to stay in business

Hi Penny,

In the interests of Transparency please very kindly advise how many OIA requests you made to the last government, to whom and what the outcome was?

Cheers :)

The electorate, not big business should determine the future of key monopoly based assets owned by Government. Selling these assets will only lead to power price increases, as proven time and time again.

Such an issue should be resolved via referendum, not through private sector lobby groups with vested interests.

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>