Business survey gives National a poke in the chest
Business New Zealand's pre election survey has some unpalatable messages for National.
Well over three quarters - 80% - of the group's members believe the government should be lifting the pension age from its present level of 65.
The pension age is emerging as a major election issue after Labour joined the Act Party in proposing to gradually raise the pension age from 2020, from 65 to 67.
Prime Minister John Key told the Business New Zealand/Deloitte pre-election conference this afternoon he had no intention of changing his party's stance on keeping the age at 65, and said that if New Zealand follows his party's economic plan, there would be no need to raise the age.
However, that same conference was told it is not at all clear that there is a plan.
A survey by Business New Zealand of its members showed nearly two thirds of businesses either do not think National has a plan for the economy or are not sure there is one.
"Despite the prime minister saying this morning he has confidence in his party's plan, a lot of people in this room are not sure there is one," Deloitte New Zealand chief executive Murray Jack told conference this afternoon.
Of particular concern is a lack of investment in skills and productivity measures - nearly three quarters say not enough is being done to support apprenticeships or formal industry training.
There is big support among Business New Zealand members, however, for the government's plan to open up to 49% of four government owned companies to private investment - more than 80% are in favour.
The survey does not give much succour to the main opposition party.
There is particular opposition to Labour's plan to return New Zealand to a quasi-award system.
The survey comments noted that Labour's policy in this area signals "a return to regimes that have been tired and failed in the past."






















Comments and questions12
these business people are as anon as me. How can you report such unsubstantiated rubbish and tell us it facts. They may as well scrap super it a load of bollocks.
Rob Hosking, you are a pro communist knob.
Dim-witted comment Anonymous 3.33pm.
The results are from a survey not an opinion piece from the reporter.
Even more dim-witted is for Goff to think that lifting the age of retirement to 67 is a vote winner at election time.
Surprising to read this as talkback radio callers seem to think this is the biggest election circuit breaker,seems Goff and Cunliffe have shot themselves in the foot.To quote some of the thinking on Goff." He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp posts,for support rather than illumination".
Although I don't normally respond to anonymous comments, I'll briefly break my ban to say,
Anon at 3:33, you have caused great hilarity in the NBR newsroom.
Especially as I asked which of them wrote it.
@ Maria: yep, he does - but to be fair, they all do that. Some are just better at it than others.
What is emerging is that no-one thinks National has a plan.
It's building to a perception of a lack of leadership. Tonight's TV debate will be telling.
They don't. They're just winging it. Real shame that Act looks like its gonna be toast, post election. They're the only party that does.
where are the unions on this issue
Brain washing Goff to not forget to turn NZ back to the seventies and eighties with union power just like the Australian Unions.Of course silly me they have already written the industrial policy to mirror Australian Unions.
John Key and his mob have lost contact with the real world
The very people who voted him in want a government that makes tough decisions and realistic ones that ensure that their kids are left with a legacy economy
But all that the current government is doing is providing soft policy that has no bearing on the future
Probably about time John got out amongst the real people - not just the ones that stoke his ego - then he would know what the public actually wants
Dont you mean Labour who had the treasury benches for nine long years or do you have selective amnesia National inherited the massive debts Labour left with their out of control bribes to keep themselves in power.Surely our offspring would have been much better off if the Labour Party had spent it on our children,not on social engineering.
Maria obviously you are using marae economics when you come up with your opinion.
Labour had surpluses you retard.