Member log in

Charter changes ready TVNZ for sale - Norris

Legislation to weaken Television New Zealand's (TVNZ) charter is a way of preparing the state broadcaster for sale, head of the New Zealand Broadcasting School Paul Norris says.

The TVNZ Amendment Bill seeks to replace the charter with a briefer, less prescriptive statement which would enable TVNZ to determine its own priorities.

Mr Norris said despite TVNZ being a state owned enterprise and operating on a commercial model, he saw it was a public asset not a commercial business.

TVNZ needed to have a charter to enshrine its public responsibilities and a system for monitoring those charter commitments, he told Parliament's commerce select committee considering the bill.

A clear policy decision on TVNZs future, including possible sale, should be made before the charter was removed.

"If you remove the charter so TVNZ is left as a fully commercial broadcaster then I can't see any reason why you'd retain it in public ownership," Mr Norris said.

"Therefore sale would have to be not just an option, but probably a preferred option."

Should TVNZ be sold it must be replaced with another form of state broadcasting, he said.

Mr Norris said the charter had problems but programmes, particularly documentaries, had been screened under the charter that would not have been in the late '90s before the charter.

TVNZ executives had a mindset that was so commercial they required a radical jolt to change, he said,

More by NZPA

More on:

Comments and questions
9

Does this government really have the balls to get rid of this taxpayer liability? I hope so. The days of state-subsidised entertainment, if that is what it is, should be well and truly over by now. As someone who has not had a TV in the house for over 30 years, i feel my taxes might be better spent elsewhere.

I wonder if Mr Norris could tell us why the State should own this asset?

There is no good reason and as far as the charter goes it is only a way for the do gooders (Clark and her ilk) to try to force feed New Zealanders rubbish nobody wants to watch.

TVNZ ought to have been dispensed with long ago although if they do look out - the days of having about ten reporters covering one story will be swiftly over.

Maybe after they privatise TVNZ they can move on to privatising the NZ Broadcasting School?

The charter made not a jot of difference, TVone is institionally unable to provide anything except cheap imported rubbish that generates ad revenue from 25 year old media buyers. It would impact them too hard on revenues for their expense accounts.
The channel is run for its employees not viewers who might want something more BBC and less Fox.

Well that's reassuring. I thought I might have been a bit lonely in the view that TVNZ was a total waste of a scarce resource-namely taxpayer funding.
So who is going to come out bleating that this is essential service- surely not a politician?

The charter was trash, thanks to Helen Clark. It's only worth was steering viewers to Sky TV, which was a real boon for them.

Sell It!!

Turning TVNZ into a private company will make it more challenging.

It's people who have ruined our country. Along with your neo-conservative 'sell sell' attitude. Where does it stop? I would rather keep TVNZ, which does make a profit and get rid of half of our MPs.

The charter didn't work because it was significantly underfunded and TVNZ paid about 50% more as a dividend to the govt then they actually were given to help implement the charter. It's not that it hasn't worked. It's that it hasn't been done yet.

And honestly, as a purely pragmatic question, who would buy TVNZ in this economic climate?

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>