Chrisco fined $175,000 for overcharging on cancellation fees

Christmas hamper company Chrisco Hampers has been fined $175,000 for overcharging customers on hamper cancellation fees.

In some cases, Chrisco was charging customers as much as $800 for cancelling their Christmas hamper orders, an investigation by the Commerce Commission found.

In the Manukau District Court today, Chrisco plead guilty to 10 charges under the Fair Trading Act for by misleading customers about terms of cancellation and fees.

Chrisco’s hampers are offered to customers on layby, with payments spread over the year. But the Commerce Commission said Chrisco was recovering more than it should have under the Layby Sales Act, which states customers have the right to cancel their order at any time governs lawful cancellation fees.

The cancellation policy Chrisco operated between 2008 and 2010 saw customers charged 20% of payments already made if they cancelled up to 90 days prior to the final payment date.

If they cancelled within 90 days of the final payment date, that fee was increased to 50% of payments already made. Commerce Commission competition manager Graham Gil said Chrisco customers were being overcharged. “As the fee was worked out as a percentage of payments already made, some customers ended up being charged hundreds of dollars. In a few cases the fee was as much as $800,” said Mr Gill. Chrisco has since reviewed and amended its cancellation policy to be 20% of payments made with a cap of $250.

It also retrospectively refunded about 750 customers a total of $141,735, in line with the amended cancellation policy. Mr Gill said it was difficult to measure the extent of harm caused by Chrisco’s errant policy, because it was hard to measure how many customers would have liked to have cancelled, but didn’t because of the high fees. Customers expect that large companies will have proper and lawful practices in place, said Mr Gill.

“During the investigation Chrisco advised us that it did not have a formal compliance programme in relation to the Fair Trading Act. This was despite the Commission raising concerns with the company about various practices including its cancellation policies.”

Chrisco also pleaded guilty to charges relating to its toys and gifts catalogue, which also breached the Layby Sales Acton cancellation payments, and its ‘Headstart Plan’ – marketed as fully-refundable up to the time an order was placed. However, the Commerce Commission said it was not clear to customers that if they didn’t make their order by a certain time, Chrisco would choose a plan for them. Once that happened, cancellation fees would apply.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

11 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

not a great week for Richard Bradley - first Kim Dotcom moving to a smaller home in Mt Eden so thats $200K a month out the dooor, then the fine plus reimbursements - oopps..


time people woke up to the likes of chrisco and realised what a far better scheme the likes of hampsta can offer...


Yes good point - I have been seeing the tvc playing for HAMPSTA - looks like a great offer. You get an eftpost style card, all the good retailers, pay the price on the day, no hidden fees or margins and the money is not held by the company, but in trust. I did a quick look at the Chrisco brochure and some of the costs are between 20 & 100% more than retail!!!! What a rip off. I bet Chrisco buys well to on a bulk deal. The other scary point is the layby bit. So I always thought a layby meant you could go and see the goods / touch them. Chrisco has no warehouse so you can't see it / touch it so that must surely be illegal use of the layby act? They are preying on people who can least afford it - what a national disgrace


^^^ Stop spamming this site, so obvious you are promoting Hampsta Gary and Peter.


Not Gary buddy - just an avid watcher of people getting ripped off


I can assure you that I have not spammed or made any remarks on this site re this topic, I always use my real name and dont hide.
Gary Alway
General Manager


If I was to promoite anything it would be the supermarket christmas clubs that give a discount on the price of the goods purchased in December. You get what you want.


But why on earth would you want to limit your buying choice to one supermarket?

Having joined hampsta last year I have the choice of over 20 retail stores and supermarkets to choose from.

Makes more sense to me


looks like there could be a rent rise coming up for a certain house.
i wonder if my rent subsidy will rise also.


No wonder the Chrisco couple have a $30million mansion. I would like to call them something very rude but will refrain.
Personally I can't understand why anyone would join these schemes. DIY is the best way.


Agree, and most lame KIWIs always Fairgo alive in NZ?


Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7738 -0.0002 -0.03%
AUD 0.9498 -0.0013 -0.14%
EUR 0.6332 0.0008 0.13%
GBP 0.4952 -0.0002 -0.04%
HKD 5.9997 -0.0042 -0.07%
JPY 92.4660 -0.0440 -0.05%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1195.4 -2.890 2014-12-19T00:
Oil Brent 61.4 1.580 2014-12-19T00:
Oil Nymex 57.1 2.910 2014-12-19T00:
Silver Index 16.0 0.096 2014-12-19T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5518.5 5545.0 5539.3 -0.21%
NASDAQ 4752.6 4782.1 4748.4 0.36%
DAX 9901.3 9901.3 9811.1 -0.25%
DJI 17778.0 17874.0 17778.2 0.15%
FTSE 6466.0 6566.9 6466.0 1.23%
HKSE 23158.3 23189.6 22832.2 1.25%
NI225 17511.0 17621.4 17210.0 2.39%