Civil defence quake ads not 'insensitive' to Chch kids
Television commercials showing school children how to protect themselves in an earthquake have been branded as “insensitive”.
The Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management has a series of four commercials showing young children in a classroom being told to “drop, cover and hold” to be safe during a quake.
The ads end with the presenter saying: ”They know what to do. Shouldn’t you?”
However, complainant M Edmonds said: "I find it very insensitive to the school children of Christchurch … to see the children practicing what to do in an earthquake and at the end come out laughing…
"Many times during the last 22 months children have had to come out in to practice the drop, cover and hold. I can assure you that not one of them has come out of the earthquake laughing.”
But in a judgment issued by the Advertising Standards Authority today, complaints board chairwoman Jenny Robson dismissed the complaint, though accepting the “sincerity” of the complainant.
The advertisements were in the category of advocacy advertising and contained important safety messages educating the public about how to reduce the chance of being injured during earthquakes, the judgment says.
The advertiser was identified in the commercial and complied with rules on ethics.
While she acknowledged that many Christchurch children were still traumatised by their experiences, Ms Robson said the nationwide campaign shared important information using young children to illustrate the safety messages, the judgment says.
“The chairwoman agreed that the demeanor of the children in the advertisement was clearly not representative of the children that had experienced earthquakes and ongoing substantial aftershocks."
The intent of the advertisement was to educate the public in areas that have not experienced strong earthquakes and would not be likely to cause either serious or widespread offence as such, and was prepared with a due sense of social responsibility, the judgment says.
There was no breach of ethics and no grounds for the complaint to proceed.
Back to home
Back to top
Print
Latest
NBR SERVICES
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Sign up for NBR subscriber content or email alerts
Comments and questions2
This is silly. As someone still with a house in Chch, but not living there any longer, my opinion is that some probably small, but vocal sections, of the city are reverting to cry-babyhood. And the school closure issue is showing where this section is: ie, the teachers and parents who instead of teaching their children in an adult fashion about the inevitable nature of change, that can be embraced for its positives, are instead feeding them inappropriate emotions on how to make your childish tantrum pay off politically. On Campbell Live I saw one poor kid in my old primary school, Greenpark, worked up into tears: that was abuse.
Yes, there are lots of problems, and mainly in the way Government is squashing property rights within the CBD, and in how Government EQC interacts with insurers - we've given up having our house fixed for years - but regarding the school issue, the Cathedral issue, et al: some people in the city have to grow up (and it would be lovely to see teachers setting a proper example to the children, rather than operating on their level).
Mark - you are so right. The teachers should be ashamed of themselves. Bet that lot would give ncea credits on placard writing and protest. Talk about peer pressure, if I was a parent at one of the schools playing the victim drama I would need no more proof that its time to leave.