Commerce Commission confirms Fonterra milk price method

BUSINESSDESK: Fonterra's method for setting the benchmark Farm Gate Milk Price is "not inconsistent" with its obligations under the Commerce Act to ensure potential competitors are able to compete with it, the Commerce Commission says.

The competition watchdog released its report after a "dry run" review of the FGMP process, concluding it "does provide for contestability in the farm gate milk market, as overall the assumptions Fonterra used in setting the price are practically feasible for an efficient processor".

"The assumptions also provide incentives for Fonterra to efficiently."

That was despite Fonterra providing insufficient information on some six of the 13 legislative requirements relating to the FGMP to allow transparency, including a lack of transparency on yields, which the commission judged to have "very high" potential impact on the price.

Disclosure on yields was "not transparent" because the "methodology for calculating yields (is) not clearly stated in (the) milk price manual".

While the dry run exercise and future reviews do not require the commission to assess the transparency of the milk price manual, "we have identified areas where we will require further information for the next and/or analysis by Fonterra, and other areas where we consider that the clarity and content of Fonterra's milk price manual can be improved".

However, the commission concluded the regime "is not inconsistent with the purpose and principles of the milk price regime set out in the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act".

The act was passed to allow Fonterra to establish its Trading Among Farmers system, which will see the creation of non-voting tradeable securities which non-farmers can invest in, while allowing its co-operative farmer members to manage their own fluctuating capital needs without making calls on the balance sheet.

The regulatory regime for establishing a milk pricing benchmark regime is essential to encouraging domestic competition for Fonterra, and the dry run process saw submissions from a range of independent processors who have argued Fonterra is able to set the FGMP to suit its commercial needs best.

The commission says the amended act does not require an existing producer to be able to achieve the level of efficiency implied by the FGMP.

"As long as Fonterra or a potential entrant achieve that level of efficiency, then that ensures that the FGMP reflects a practically feasible level, and would provide a normal return on incremental investment."

The commission noted several limitations to the dry run review, some of which will be rectified in future statutory reviews.

These included not all the information received from Fonterra being available in the form sought, and not reviewing the appropriateness of the capital asset values used in the model.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

4 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Good!

Now all the whinging lefties that complain parents dont have enough money to buy milk - here's the solution - stop breeding of you can't afford to feed them for the 1st 18 years of their life - you are responsible for your own children's welfare - not the State, not WINZ, not a union, not your IWI - but you - the parent! Personal responsibility!

Instead of buying SkyTV, booze, cigarette's, KFC, lotto, processed junk foods - buy milk instead, use a spade and make yourself a large vege garden, buy flour in bulk and make your own bread...

...and with the left over money you have saved - either invest into a college education fund for your children, or invest in your own education so you can secure a better paying job - which helps pay for more milk to feed your kids.

Now just wait for the whinging, leftards to moan about these comments or anything or anyone else except themselves!

Reply
Share

Fonterra's method for setting the benchmark Farm Gate Milk Price is "not inconsistent" with its obligations under the Commerce Act to ensure potential competitors are able to compete with it, the Commerce Commission says .... That was despite Fonterra providing insufficient information on some six of the 13 legislative requirements relating to the FGMP to allow transparency, including a lack of transparency on yields, which the commission judged to have "very high" potential impact on the price.

In other words, Fonterra gave us some of the info we needed and that looked OK but there is still plenty of information which could impact the milk price which Fonterra didn't give us. So how can they make an accurate assessment? What a joke!

Reply
Share

You can not get any more left wing than communism and that is EXACTLY what the parliamentary creation of Fonterra was.
Deliberately designed to rip the consumer off and distort the investment field.

Reply
Share

Consumer choice was sacrificed on the altar of export monopoly, as for apples and kiwifruit.

Reply
Share

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7959 -0.0001 -0.01%
AUD 0.9075 0.0004 0.04%
EUR 0.6264 0.0040 0.64%
GBP 0.4941 0.0013 0.26%
HKD 6.1735 -0.0023 -0.04%
JPY 85.1880 0.1030 0.12%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1248.5 4.340 2014-10-21T00:
Oil Brent 86.2 0.820 2014-10-21T00:
Oil Nymex 82.5 -0.260 2014-10-21T00:
Silver Index 17.5 0.190 2014-10-21T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5233.1 5272.2 5233.1 0.75%
NASDAQ 4359.2 4419.5 4316.1 2.40%
DAX 8693.1 8889.8 8717.8 1.94%
DJI 16406.0 16620.8 16399.7 1.31%
FTSE 6267.1 6372.3 6267.1 1.68%
HKSE 23300.5 23300.5 23088.6 0.70%
NI225 15038.2 15129.1 14804.3 1.72%