Commerce Commission still probing sale of interest rate swaps
The Commerce Commission says it is still working on its investigation into whether interest rate swaps were misleadingly marketed after claims by farmers that they got locked into confusing contracts with excessive break fees.
The commission began its probe in August last year and has received 42 complaints since concerns over the way the financial derivatives were sold first aired in the media, chairman Mark Berry told parliament's primary production select committee.
The swaps allow clients to manage the interest rate exposure on their borrowing and are typically marketed to large corporations and institutions. However, from 2005 banks began marketing them to their rural and commercial clients.
Farmer lobby Federated Farmers was among groups seeking a review by the regulator, saying the instruments were mostly sold to its members from 2007-09, with concerns about them only surfacing in the wake of the global financial crisis.
Fed president Bruce Wills called the swaps "incredibly complicated instruments". Farmers had reported that margins had been changed on fixed term swap rates and that loan contract clauses might have been changed to allow that to happen.
Considerable confusion
"There appears to be considerable confusion about swaps, with them being sold to farmers as though they are fixed rate products," he says. While farmers had to take responsibility for their financial decisions, the lobby group "will not excuse the wilful mis-selling of any product, financial or otherwise".
Not many farmers use swaps and some who do rate them highly, he says.
Labour's primary industries spokesman Damien O'Connor said last week that "the practice of selling complicated finance products to farmers has been far more extensive than previously stated".
"This is a serious issue that needs careful consideration because it has major implications for primary sector financing where debt currently runs at close to $50 billion," he said.
Mr Berry says his investigation's primary aim is to establish whether the swaps were marketed "in ways that may have misled customers as to their true risk, nature and suitability".
The regulator had received a large amount of information from complainants and banks and will shortly widen its inquiries, seeking further information from people who have entered into interest rate swaps.
(BusinessDesk)






















Comments and questions7
Let me guess - all 42 complainants have had the market rates go against them?
I fixed a rate a few years back on my mortgage too and the floating rate is now lower. Should I cry about it to the CC too or is it just the farmers in this country that continually get special treatment?
Hang on, do you honestly believe that bank instuments like interest rate swaps are something similar to just fixing your mortgage? By all means, then 'cry to the CC'... But don't let the door bang you in the a*se on the way out.
The effect is exactly the same.
And tonight I'm going to declare my front lawn a 'drought zone', in the hope that I can apply to the government for special taxpayer assistance to replant it...oops, no that only applies to farmers too...
Blued....very similar. A swap taken and left untouched is the same as a fixed mortgage in all aspects except one, it only hedges the base rate not the bank's margins..they never have. and they never will.
Guts of the problem is farmers took them at high levels, as well as doing the same with fixed rate term loans, and had a big opportunity loss with them, the same as they did with fixed rate term loans
Best claim to be a dumb farmer and claim you didn't understand fixed means fixed ...can't blame them for giving it a go. The problem for them now is, the ones truly dumb on it will go back to using fixed rate term loans being scared of swaps, and start locking in for the bank the biggest bank margins (thanks to record funding costs banks are exposed to) that have been around for years...
Dumb is dumb, I guess, but to be fair to them, many of their accountants are even lazier and been guided by the publicity and haven't bothered to check the facts.
The problem is that some of the bankers who were made by their masters to sell them,didn't understand them.
The first banker to introduce me to them told that.
And as a Treasury-based banker said to me one day: "the colleague sitting in the chair next to me got it wrong when he fixed his house mortgage."
A discusion with a Treasury banker on how they arranged a large farm mortgage. We put a dollar each way...one-third on caps,one-third on swaps and one-third on fixed.
Hang on a minute. First, unless you ate literally broke, you don't get handouts - in Northland during the last drought 16 out of 2000+ got one and you can bet they were on the way out. Go to the MSD website and check the criteria. Read this to see what a drought declaration means - http://www.fedfarm.org.nz/publications/media-releases/article.asp?id=546.
As for swaps, Bruce Wills is clear misselling is bad but making a duff business decision is absolutely no defence - Bruce's release is here and is worth reading. http://www.fedfarm.org.nz/publications/media-releases/article.asp?id=545
The problem with these instruments is that they allowed the bank to change the rules to their benefit but not the farmers. So it was always going to be the bank that won. Like going to the casino and putting your money on the black jack table only to find the casino changes the rule when it appears that you are going to win.
Bank in the UK are up for BIllions for doing tha same thing.