Compensation does not appear to be an issue in sorting out the foreshore and seabed row, Prime Minister John Key said today.
A government-appointed review panel last week released its report on the Foreshore and Seabed Act, recommending its repeal and saying interim legislation should be put in place until the politicians work out a way to recognise Maori rights to coastal areas.
One of the options is for national and/or regional settlements with compensation as a possibility.
Mr Key said the preliminary reaction from most parties was that compensation was not an issue.
"I don't want to prejudice the process today, but I think you could characterise it by saying that there seems to be a strong consensus that compensation is not likely to be part of the process in settling the foreshore and seabed," Mr Key said
No one seemed to be seeking freehold titles, but it still had to be worked out what a customary right meant and what if any property rights went with them.
Mr Key said much of the issue was "restoration of mana" as the law had taken away the right for Maori to go to court.
"It's not about, I don't believe, compensation. It's not about freehold title, but is about their mana being restored."
Mr Key acknowledged that the 2003 Court of Appeal decision had raised the possibility of small areas being subjected to customary titles and this had grown into calls for a national settlement.
The issue was complex and the Government had to decide whether to take a broad brush approach to settling the grievance or allow individual cases to be considered or go through the courts, he said.
The Government would deliberately take time to work and see if a consensus could be formed.
There had been a "snap reaction" from the previous government to the Court of Appeal decision and this may have not led to the best result.
The foreshore and seabed issue had become a "weeping sore" that needed to be healed without taking away anyone's access to beaches.
Comments
Key and non-existent "customary rights".
Key is talking nonsense. Does he really believe that "compensation" is not being sought by Maori? Of course it is... It looks like a duck, quacks like a duck...what should we think it is?
Worse, does Key know this is nonsense - but think he can persuade us this is not the case?
And "compensation" for what? In spite of what this basically oh-so-carefully selected, activist panel says, Maori never owned the foreshores and seabed any more the than did the European settlers... In fact Maori tribes had no legal title or actual rights at all to any land until the Treaty of Waitangi granted them equal rights in law. Not greater...
Until then, a tribe held land only as long as it could withstand the maruadings of the tribe over the hill. It had no expected or customary "rights" to anything.
When Maori, as with European, were given the rights of ownership over their land - it was just that, land - in exactly the same way as Europeans rights to their own land. The notion of extending this to rights for Maori only over forshores, sea and lake beds is a recent highly lucrative but spurious invention - as most of the public well recognises. Not the political ingroups and the usual depressingly gullible and non-analytical mainstream media - of course.
It's time these ridiculous assertions by tribes that of course want "compensation' and will certainly go all out for it down the line - as some have already indicated - were well and truly challenged. As John Key too, needs to be challenged on this highly dubious assertion... It's a bit much to expect us to think he really believes this, isn't it? So why is he saying it? Let's think, shall we...?
Ridiculous
If compensation or money was not an issue, the foreshore and seabed issue would not cease to be. This is a lucrative situation where one party has demanded something absurd yet others are willing to negotiate and compromise. One thing leads to another, and most likely a few years down the track Maori will use this to their advantage and probably claim upon the result on this.
But more so, should we not remind ourselves that at the end of the day this whole fiasco is simply the very definition of racism. Because while everyone is equal, some are just more equal than others.
What about my mana?
I would like to see where all this "Foreshore and Seabed Act" fits in with the Race Relations Act.
Isn't there a wee conflict of interest there?
Hear Hear
Agree completely with rain girl & rc. Well said.
Post new comment