Councils threatened with adminstration over RMA woes
Eight councils, including Auckland City and Environment Canterbury, have been warned an administrator could be sent in to run them if they do not improve their resource consent times.
Environment Minister Nick Smith told Parliament today that while he was "reluctant" to use his powers under the Resource Management Act (RMA), councils that failed to meet deadlines more often than they met them had to get their acts together.
Dr Smith said he had written to eight councils pointing out that he had powers under the RMA to send in an administrator to run them if they could not obey the law.
He singled out Environment Canterbury saying it was "hopeless' at processing all types of consents.
While it had difficult issues to deal with over water usage, it also failed in other resource consents.
Dr Smith told MPs that he was "reluctant" to use his powers, but councils had to show him they had a plan to improve their performance within 60 days.
The councils written to were:
* Whakatane District Council;
* Auckland City Council;
* Carterton District Council;
* Waimate District Council;
* Far North District Council;
* Manukau City Council;
* Westland District Council; and
* Environment Canterbury.
Dr Smith said the delays cost millions of dollars and he wanted improvements.
Too many councils were automatically granting themselves extensions to deadlines and he wanted this power limited.
Dr Smith said he had written to the councils last week following the release of the two-yearly report on local authorities' administration of the RMA
"This report tells a sorry story of delay, frustration and unnecessary costs for more than 16,000 homeowners, businesses and farmers whose consents last year were not processed within the legal timeframe," Dr Smith said.
"This problem has been ignored and got progressively worse over the past decade increasing from 18 percent to 31 percent, despite a nine-fold increase from 3 percent to 27 percent in consents where councils granted themselves a 20-day extension."
A select committee is considering a bill amending the RMA which Dr Smith said would simplify consent processes and give councils incentives to process applications faster.
In a table provided showing different councils performances, Environment Canterbury processed only 29 percent of resource consent applications on time in 2007-08 -- down from 72 percent in 2005-06.
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit














Comments and questions4
The fundamental problem is that Labour created the RMA with the intention of reducing the rights of "owners". The RMA has created a whole group of used car salesman who are gods gift to planning. They have this inate ability to understand that lord denning would struggle with.. character and more than minor.
This means that nothing new or exciting can or will happen..output is diminsihing.. yet Councils have increasing staff numbers.
Let the showdown begin - and the Sinners named !
Having worked within a council consent department I know that many councils extend the 20 day legal requirement to 40 days as provided for in the legislation, and then they stop the clock while "waiting for further information".
The best way to give councils a hurry up to to force them to refund the application fees if council's fail to meet their legal requirements - in full in extreme cases. I know of minor consents that have taken 90 working days to "processs", while sitting in in-trays for all but one or two days.
Reimbursing fees may not be a total solution as council's will simply hike up their fees to recover the refunds. They already over-allocate corporate overheads to the consents department, and recovering that cost via the consent fees.
Experience has shown me that councils are very inefficient, and very wasteful with ratepayers money. They only get away with it because of their monopoly powers. If central government wants to protect people from monopolies then it should start with reforming local government.
The council need to stop playing God when it comes to the resource consent process. Its an absolute disgrace what goes on, and I can only hope that the RMA is scrapped and the councils true agenda exposed.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below