David Ross, who swindled some 1,200 investors out of about $155 million, lost a Court of Appeal bid for a reduction in how much time he spends in prison before eligible for parole, a decision welcome by market regulators.
"We believe that the decision to uphold the original sentence reflects the seriousness of Mr Ross's criminal offending and the significant harm that his behaviour has caused to investors," the Financial Markets Authority and Serious Fraud Office said in a joint statement. The two regulators "welcome the decision."
Wellington-based Ross built up a private investment service by word of mouth, producing regular reports for shareholders indicating healthy but fictitious returns. Between June 2000 and September 2012, Ross reported false profits of $351 million from fictitious securities trading as part of a fraud that was the largest single such crime committed by an individual in New Zealand.
Ross is facing a minimum non-parole period of five years and five months under his current sentence of 10 years and 10 months, a period his lawyers had argued was "manifestly excessive" or "inappropriate."
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- NZ beef exports to Taiwan rise to a record, propelling it to third largest market
- Gareth Morgan wades into Awaroa beach
- Politics: What Key must do now
- Chief Justice Elias and hubby Fletcher hit with wet bus ticket over stock in lake
- MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares fall on weak global sentiment; Xero, Spark, A2 drop, Warehouse rises
Most listened to
- Green party co-leader James Shaw and Business NZ's John Carnegie go head-to-head on the ETS review
- Cream Trading CEO Kevin O'Sullivan on why dairy companies might want to sign up to the new trading platform
- Paul Brislen on the merits of "cutting off the money" versus Netflix' technical attempts to shut-out unblockers
- Westpac's Dominick Stephens says dairy prices are still a major concern, despite El Niño fears fading
- London School of Economics Professor John Kay discusses financial regulatory shortcomings