Craigs censured, fined $45,000 for trading glitches
"The lack of protection provided to the sellers and their interests in the cancelled contracts is disturbing."
Featured commentBUSINESSDESK: Craigs Investment Partners, the Tauranga-based brokerage half-owned by Deutsche Bank, has been censured and fined a total of $45,000 by the NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal over two breaches of NZX trading rules related to Telecom and Rubicon shares.
The tribunal ruled that Craigs couldn’t escape blame even though it had argued the erroneous trades weren’t caught by filters installed by its trading system provider.
According to the tribunal’s statement, a direct market access client used Craigs trading system on August 2 last year to enter an order on the NZX Trading System to buy 640,000 Telecom shares.
No price was specified but the order “was immediately matched against more than 17 sell orders and resulted in a change to the traded price of TEL shares from $2.68 to $3.31, a 23.5% increase”, the tribunal said.
Craigs said the client entered the order in error and Telecom stock was subsequently halted and 52 trades cancelled.
On November 15, the same client entered an order to buy 30,000 Rubicon shares, which was “immediately matched against three sell orders, resulting in a change to the traded price of RBC from $0.39 to $0.58, a 48% spike”. Again, the trades were cancelled.
“Both orders created considerable market disruption,” the tribunal said. It imposed a fine of $35,000 for the Telecom breaches and $10,000 for the Rubicon breaches and ordered Craigs to pay the tribunal’s costs.
“Participants are responsible for their own trades; the rules do not entitle them to point the finger at anyone else if things go wrong,” it said.
“If participants choose to utilise third-party providers they must also insist that those providers are similarly vigilant to ensure errors of this kind do not occur.”























Comments and questions5
the nzx is a joke
they fail completely to protect individual investors yet when maybe the most ethical broking co in nz has a technical problem they do this
shame on you NZX
The NZX need to keep the level of penalties up, as under Weldon's reign he designed the disciplinary process so that the cost of running NZX Discipline is a NZX Cost, however if fines and penalties exist then the cost to NZX is after fines and penalties. Therefore the more they fine the less it costs NZX.
This is why this system is wrong.
As for this particular case, as in many cases NZXD has looked at this looks rough - and frankly disproportionate to civil crimes - Neil Craig could have operated a unsafe work environment leading to the death of an employee and got less of a penalty.
Penalising a broker for executing an order as specified by the customer? And then cancelling the transactions to the detriment of the sellers? I can't see the justification or merit in either part. In what way is correctly matching buy and sell orders according to their terms disruptive?
A price is not a thing, value is subjective, and prices are not fixed and there isn't a good basis to believe prices should be stable as an end in and of itself.
Somehow the value placed on legal certainty has been eroded in the pursuit of a range of nebulous and dubious concepts and terms. The lack of protection provided to the sellers and their interests in the cancelled contracts is disturbing.
NZX protect their friends, this tells me that Craigs are not one of their "friends". As a client of Craigs
I am delighted to know this, but sad that a "tech. gitch" should cost them Craigs so much.
How can the hefty fine (plus costs) be justified for some inconvenience to the participants?
Shows glaringly how wrong it is for NZX to be market maker, regulator and benefactor.
Nice earner for the NZX (with its coffers filled by its monopoly charges on market participants and bugger all service back to the market) and nice earners for those on the Disciplinary Panel.
This is what Mark Weldon and his sponsors have done to the NZX - a profit gouging monopoly and a law unto itself.
Oh well, karma is already exacting itself on a few of Mark's sponsors.
Tragic but true.