Member log in

Crown, investors get another $35m from Equitable Mortgages

BUSINESSDESK: Investors are set to receive $35 million from the receivers of failed lender Equitable Mortgages in the third payment since debenture holders were bailed out through the Crown's retail deposit guarantee scheme almost two years ago.

KordaMentha's Grant Graham flagged a third distribution payment will be made today, taking total repayments to $85 million, or 44% of the principal, the latest receiver's report says.

He kept his forecast recovery at between 65% and 70% of the $192.3 million owed to the Crown and investors. Unsecured creditors are owed some $25,000.

“We believe it is extremely unlikely there will be a return to unsecured creditors and we expect there to be a shortfall owing to investors and the Crown,” Mr Graham says in his report.

At the time of receivership, Equitable Mortgages had loans worth $188.4 million to be recovered, net of provisioning for impairments.

Between December 19 and June 18 the receiver got some $20 million in loan repayments and a further $126,000 in loan interest.

The bulk of the funds are owed to the government, which has paid out 99% of the $178 million to about 6000 investors whose debentures were covered by the now-defunct retail deposit guarantee scheme.

Mr Graham says he has reached a $12.5 million settlement with Equitable General Insurance over loan loss cover policies since the end of the reporting period.

Equitable Mortgages, which was controlled by the family of the late Peter Spencer, called in the receivers in November 2010, blaming ongoing asset deterioration, dwindling loan business and a lack of investment appetite for its failure.

Deloitte was initially appointed but had to step aside after missing a conflict of interest with its audit team during the tender process.

Mr Graham says he has yet to receive a claim from the Inland Revenue Department.

Comments and questions
3

How many unsecured noteholders are left out of pocket? Is it because the numbers are smaller that we are not focusing on the directors here?

Perhaps it is because there was no related party lending, no mis-leading statements in prospectus disclosures and no raping and pillaging of the company which led to its receivership.
Unfortunately there is risk with finance companies' lending and even first mortgage holders got burnt as a result of NZ's property bubble burst. Investors cannot be completely shielded from this, even with a healthy dollop of shareholders' funds standing as a buffer.
It is time to move on from the past and save tax-payers more expense through seeking to crucify honest and diligent business people who just happened to be at the controls during this time of woe.

still smells. you have to wonder if deloittes would done bettrer. has anyone done analysis of how various accounting firms have performed in these doomsday finance companies?