BUSINESSDESK: The Electricity Authority is under fire from Labour’s economic development spokesman David Cunliffe for taking electricity companies’ profits into account when deciding how competitive the sector has become.
Cunliffe sparred with the authority’s chairman, Brent Layton, on the issue, turning a low-key review of the EA’s first year of operation into an unusually testy exchange between an MP and a senior public servant.
At times during the exchange, both “begged to differ” with one another’s interpretation of how competition should be measured, with Cunliffe insisting the EA is using an outdated approach to measuring competitiveness and Layton insisting it was not and that Cunliffe doesn’t understand the Commerce Act.
The issue arose over the way the EA analyses industry statistics to deduce the net economic benefit to the nation as a whole from electricity industry participants’ behaviour.
Cunliffe asked why the EA continues to use a “producer surplus” measure when such measures were long ago dropped in considering competitive dynamics in the telecommunications sector, where it had been concluded that it was sufficient only to measure benefits to consumers for a net benefit calculation.
Layton disagreed, citing the recent Commerce Commission decision allowing a wool-scouring monopoly in New Zealand on the basis that, even if it reduced local competition, it would give the industry scale to compete against Chinese scours, their main competitor.
“If you don’t test both (producer and consumer benefits), then … you will end up treating the economy in a way that’s to the long term detriment of consumers,” Layton said.
Labour MP Clayton Cosgrove pressed Layton on whether the authority had done any analysis of the potential impact on electricity prices of partial privatisation.
Layton said no such analysis had been done, as the competitive settings in the market were unaffected by who owned the assets. Retail electricity retailing had become considerably more competitive, in part because of the authority’s “What’s My Number?” switching campaign, with some 25 percent of all electricity generation currently produced by private sector players.
Up to that point, the hearing had been something a back-slapping exercise noting the success of the campaign, which MPs said they would like to see target elderly consumers and people living in more remote areas which had not experienced such an uplift in competition.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Marlborough displaces Central Otago for best Pinot Noir in world competition
- Hellaby shareholder: Bapcor’s offer price is too low
- READER POLL RESULT: Who won the first presidential debate?
- Warminger complained of 'aggressive selling' in email to NZX
- Court rules against Chinese investor over $7.3m Auckland property deal
Most listened to
- Ironically, Trump showed the lack of stamina he had accused Clinton of, says NBR's Rob Hosking
- NZX market surveillance manager Fraser Wyeth gives evidence at the Warminger trial
- Hellaby shareholder Aaron Bhatnagar says why he thinks Bapcor's offer is too low
- No knockout blows in first presidential debate, says NBR's Nevil Gibson
- Intueri's problems raise questions for the board, says Martin Watson of the Shareholders Association