Diligent to restate revenue of past three years – US sales slow
"Still a fine company, in my view, at a justifiable share price."Featured comment
Diligent Board Member Services, the governance app maker hit by a slew of administrative mis-steps, will restate how it has recognised revenue over the past three financial years, delaying publication of second-quarter trading, which it says will show slowing sales in the US.
The New York-based company will restate financial statements for the 2010, 2011, 2012 financial years and the first quarter of 2013, it says in a statement.
The adjustments will mean customer revenue will be recognised from the date of a contract being signed rather than the start of a month, and revenue from installation fees will be recognised over a longer period of time, it says. The effect of the errors accelerated the time these revenue streams were recognised.
Diligent will also properly capitalise costs associated with software developed for internal use, which have previously been expensed.
The errors will not affect the total revenues earned or the timing of cash received, it says.
The shares dropped 3.3 percent to $5.85 in trading today, and have slumped 28 percent from a peak on June 11.
Diligent posted a tripling in annual profit last year with annual revenue more than doubling to $US43.7 million. Annualised sales were $US58.4 million in the 12 months ended March 31.
The restatement means Diligent will not file its second-quarter earnings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission by the August 9 due date.
Chief executive Alex Sodi says the company maintained its 97 percent client retention rate in the period and new sales outside the US were strong, though new sales within the US were slowing.
"We expect our recurring revenue model to continue to drive revenue growth at a strong pace."
Diligent added 173 net new client agreements in the three months ended June 30, servicing 2183 companies and 3075 boards.
It increased its cash balance by $US2.5 million in the quarter to $US39 million, after paying $US1.8 million relating to the special committee process and $US1 million in related remediation when it discovered it paid executives too much in its bonus scheme.