UPDATE Oct 11: As he flagged yesterday, Kim Dotcom's US lawyer has filed a renewed motion to dismiss the US government case against Megaupload and its senior executives.
Ira Rothken's appeal argues prosecutors have violated his client's right to due process by failing to deliver its indictment for more than nine months.
The motion was filed in the Eastern District Court of Virginia, the US state where Megaupload's servers were hosted.
In a decision released yesterday (see below), US District Judge Liam O'Grady threw out an appeal to dismiss the case based on the fact an indictment had to be delivered to a US address (Megaupload is incorporated in Hong Kong, while Mr Dotcom is lives in New Zealand), but indicated delays in the case offered possible ground for appeal.
RAW DATA: Renewal of Request for Dismissal (PDF)
Dotcom lawyer fails to get US govt's Megaupload case thrown out
Oct 10: A bid to get the US government's case against Megaupload thrown out on a technicality has failed.
US District Judge Liam O'Grady has ruled there was no procedural error in prosecutors' inability to serve papers in the United States to Megaupload executives.
Kim Dotcom's lawyer, Ira Rothken, had argued US law requires a corporate criminal indictment be sent to a company's last known address in the US.
But Megaupload is incorporated Hong Kong, while its CEO, Kim Dotcom, is resident in New Zealand.
However, Judge O'Grady says prosecutors can officially indict Kim Dotcom and his co-accused Megaupload executives after they have been extradited to the US.
"To this court's knowledge, no court has ever dismissed an indictment for failure to meet Rule 4's secondary mailing requirement," the judge wrote in his ruling, made on Friday and posted online today.
He says Congress had not intended to create a loophoole that would leave foreign corporations outside the reach of US law.
Mr Dotcom's extradition hearing is scheduled for March next year.
Mr Rothken told Reuters that while the judgment went against his client, it also raises the possibility the Megaupload case could be dismissed on other grounds, including delays which have denied Mr Dotcom due process.
He intends to file a request for the case to be dismissed on those grounds.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares fall, A2, Xero down as investors take profit
- Power and loot for country’s best known TPP critic
- Dunne warns of 'consequences' if Maori Party supports RMA reform
- UPDATED: Fonterra shareholders evenly split on shrinking board
- Fonterra to pour cold water over Indonesian forest fires claims
Most listened to
- Trilogy International CEO Angela Buglass on tripling her profit
- Eroad CEO Steven Newman talks about his company's revenue increase
- What do the latest terrorism attacks in Mali and Israel mean? Nathan Smith discusses the latest foreign affairs news
- NZ Windfarms departing director Michael Stiassny speaks out after board exit
- James Mayo talks about SOS Hydration's growth plans after Snowball offer
- Michael Wood on whether he would run in Mt Roskill
- SAFE's Abi Izzard quizzed over protest of a caged hen operation at Pukekohe
- Nevil Gibson talks about Editor's Insight on the planned $US150 million merger between Pfizer and Allergan
- Taupo Beef’s Mike Barton on how to extract sustainable profit from farming
- Will the government lose on RMA reform? Rob Hosking outlines the PM's speech
- How could bookmakers recoup $16 million? Racing Board chief executive John Allen explains
- Nevil Gibson breaks down the latest aviation news