Elevation Capital questions Fisher Funds' renewed Marlin contract

BUSINESSDESK: Fund manager Elevation Capital is questioning Marlin Global's decision to renew Fisher Funds' management of the listed investment firm ahead of next week's annual meeting, where Elevation is lobbying to wind up the company.

Elevation is urging Marlin shareholders to consider why the firm's independent directors backed renewing a management contract before the annual meeting, and with the knowledge of the resolution to wind the company up.

The fund manager wants Marlin shareholders to support a resolution at the November 1 annual meeting to end its management contract with Fisher Funds and liquidate the portfolio, saying the expiry of the contract could have offered the lowest termination fee in years.

"Why did the independent directors not want to hear from all shareholders as to the future of Marlin Global before reappointing the manager," Elevation asks in a presentation published on its website.

Elevation put its proposal to Marlin on October 9 and met with independent directors six days later. The following day Marlin announced the renewal of the Fisher Funds contract, before later publicly announcing Elevation's resolution.

Marlin independent directors Alistair Ryan and Carol Campbell scotched the proposal, saying Elevation is a rival fund manager and had only been a shareholder for a matter of weeks. Likewise, Fisher Funds' Carmel Fisher says Elevation's hostile approach was aimed at making a one-off gain and investors should be looking for a long-term investment focus.

Elevation denied claims it is a short-term investor, saying the average holding period for an investment is 21 months. It claims liquidating Marlin and selling up would see shareholders get a return of about 81 cents per share, a 14% premium to the current trading price of 71 cents.

The fund manager says Marlin is already returning capital to shareholders through its managed dividend policy that pays out more than the investment firm earns.

"There exists better performing and a more diverse range of international equity offerings available to shareholders with more attractive risk/reward profiles," the Elevation presentation says.

In 2009, Marlin shareholders turned down a similar bid from investor Gary Cross, who sought to change the investment company into an open-ended managed fund after the gap between its share price and net asset value widened.

He and his supporters forced Marlin to order an independent report to look at delisting and restructuring, and said ways the investment vehicle could improve its NAV were through share buy-back schemes, implementing a managed dividend policy or winding up.

As at October 23, Marlin's net asset value was 82.35 cents after deducting treasury stock from the buy-back programme. Its five biggest assets are Germany's Biotest, Stratec Biomedical, Wirecard, Israel's Sarin Technologies and US-based Orthofix.

Marlin wrote down 80% of its stake in recycling paper company Fook Woo after the Hong Kong-listed firm was suspended from trading amid allegations of fraud. Fook Woo accounts for about 1% of the Marlin portfolio.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

5 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Paul, you have missed some of the most important points in the Elevation presentation!!

Reply
Share

Yawn....if Elevation don't like the stock, they should sell it. It just looks like their trying to wind Marlin up for a quick fire profit.

Reply
Share

I think this is good. NZ needs more shareholder activism from institutions.

I hope the shareholders consider the points raise bofore making a decision. If they decide not to wide up the fund, then they should at least be holding the independent directors to account more.

Reply
Share

Well, at least someone would be making some money from Marlin then. The fund has been a poor performer, it takes agitation every now and then to help shareholders recover value and get a better deal.

Reply
Share

We all like to complain that the government is costing too much and doing too little, too bad we couldn't wind up the government. Perhaps in this case Marlin is doing too little to bring real benefits to its stockholder, the good thing is we can wind it up if we want to... NZ needs more companies that are thriving not maintaining the "status quo".. or even worse like Marlin is doing... slowly but surely draining stockholder's hard-earn cash away...

Reply
Share

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7850 0.0000 0.00%
AUD 0.8924 0.0000 0.00%
EUR 0.6196 0.0000 0.00%
GBP 0.4880 0.0000 0.00%
HKD 6.0917 0.0000 0.00%
JPY 84.8970 0.0000 0.00%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1231.3 -0.710 2014-10-24T00:
Oil Brent 86.1 -0.510 2014-10-24T00:
Oil Nymex 81.0 -1.020 2014-10-24T00:
Silver Index 17.1 0.024 2014-10-24T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5292.8 5344.4 5341.7 -0.15%
NASDAQ 4459.5 4486.3 4452.8 0.69%
DAX 9008.6 9044.9 9047.3 -0.66%
DJI 16677.0 16811.7 16677.9 0.76%
FTSE 6419.1 6419.1 6419.1 -0.47%
HKSE 23311.9 23352.6 23333.2 -0.13%
NI225 15354.4 15377.0 15139.0 1.01%