Member log in

Enable: fibre to first Chch homes by June

Enable says the first Christchurch homes will be connected to fibre by June its Ultrafast Broadband (UFB) roll-out.

The company has also pledged that the UFB will lead to cheaper wholesale rates for business plans on its existing fibre network, and named its first retail ISP partners.

Council-owned Enable won the UFB contract for Christchurch, and is partnering Crown Fibre Holdings in the rollout.

Enable’s network currently covers around 80% of the city’s commercial district, passing around 7000 businesses.

Under the UFB, it has begun to expand its network.

Enable chief executive Steve Fuller said the 10-year UFB roll-out would be a key part of the Christchurch rollout.

“Fibre-to-the-home opens the opportunity for companies such as Google and Microsoft, TV networks and other technology innovators to create the exciting new applications that will run over our network,” Mr Fuller said.

“We are currently deploying UFB in Halswell and Aidanfield – and in commercial parts of Woolston, Hornby and Middleton. We will soon begin deployment to some residential parts of Papanui,” an Enable spokesman told NBR.

Mr Fuller told NBR the initial focus was on western suburbs unaffected by the quakes. 

Its network would cover 20,000 Christchurch homes and businesses by June, with a further 12,000 added by the end of the year. By the end of the decade, Enable's UFB rollout will pass 180,000 homes and businesses.

Speeds of up to 100Mbit/s (or roughly 10 times the speed of older copper lines) are promised, at “prices similar to today’s broadband.”

Last year, boutique Whangarei ISP Uber Group became the first internet service provider to reveal retail UFB pricing.

Uber’s plans start from $99 a month with a VoIP service for making phone calls over the internet, 150GB cap and 50Mbit/s speed.

Get ready for the stick
The Commerce Commission’s latest issues paper on demand for high speed internet services, released last week, made unhappy reading for broadband boosters as Chorus, Enable, Northpower and Ultrafast Fibre begin their rollouts under the public-private UFB scheme (which sees Crown Fibre Holdings chipping in $1.35 billion, to be matched or more by the four regional contract holders.).

Tapping Nielsen and Roy Morgan research, the "Content and Willingness to Pay" paper says three quarters of small to medium businesses are happy with today’s broadband.

And in the home market, most are willing only willing to pay $5 to $10 a month for high-speed internet.

That could be bad news for fibre uptake - or at least it would be in a world were providers were only relying on the carrot of competitively priced fibre to lure customers to upgrade from copper.

In reality, there will also be a stick (not mentioned least week). The legislation that provided for the UFB, and Telecom's split, also allowed for "averaging" of rural and urban copper pricing - a provision that kicks in in around 18 months.

There are far more urban homes than rural, and rural lines are more expensive. The net effect is that monthly bills for most on copper connections will rise by around $20 a month - providing a hefty negative incentive to make the move to fibre (a catch: some homes won't get the option of fibre until the end of this decade under the lengthy UFB roll-out, which prioritises businesses, schools and hospitals).

More by Chris Keall

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
8

Build it and they will come.
Its the 1990's all over again.
Spend the money and then work out whether anyone wants it. Any commercial organisation that operated in such a manner (build, launch, research) wouldnt be around very long......
Good thing that the taxpayers dont mind footing the bill.

Considering TelstraClear already has a high speed cable in parts of ChCh (not fibre but speeds are good enough for a start), you have to wonder why Chch is the first to get it built.

It will be interesting to see what the take up rate is considering most residents are probably more concerned about fixing the cracks in their house, than updating their technology to make use of fibre.

Pouring money (and fibre) into a black-hole?

Govt. seems good at that. What would they know about where fibre needs to be?

What bullshit. The comments, not the story or the UFB.

The reason the public is paying is because the telcos won't do it because there IS no business case. Today, customers simply aren't ready for fibre. TelstraClear has its cable network but can't sell these products for two reasons: firstly, it doesn't market them and secondly it charges like a wounded bull for them.
Enable is "first off the rank" because it moves faster than Chorus, which has 70% of the build.
This is not a commercial operation, this is a generational step-change.

so customers don't want Fibre, and Telcos don't want to provide it.

where, then, is the problem that needs to be solved by oodles of taxpayer money?

The key questions for me are-
1) who will pay to run fibre up the long drive to my house on a back section?
2) who will pay to install and rewire my house for fibre and how do I do it without wrecking interior walls.
All the proponents of fibre to the home are silent on these issues or weasel word around it.

I will not fork out the estimated $3.5k to run fibre up my drive and install the necessary connection box in the house. I am not prepared to wreck, repair or repaint interior walls or run cables on the outside of interior walls to accommodate fibre through the house.

The only time high speed broadband will a realistic option will be when a house is being built or renovated or where the necessary wiring can be installed in exisitng walls. For most of us it will not be an option. I will keep my existing copper broadband connection thank you. I suspect many others will be the same. High speed broadband will not meet his takeup targets for those very reasons.

[Connection is free under the UFB - thanks to Crown Fibre Holdings chipping in (which we do of course pay for indirectly as taxpayers).

Good questions on the fine points of connectivity. I'll check with UFB players and potential retailers.

One option that's been mooted is fibre running past your curb, but copper from curb to your front door connecting to your existing (often substandard) home wiring - though then of course you're not getting the maximum benefit - CK]

Just another example of the People's Republic of Christchurch at work. Wouldn't the money be better spent helping rebuild Chirstchurch?

In response to Lindsay Fergusson | Monday, February 13, 2012 - 2:37pm

My republic is doing just nicely thank you. We have our own Govt department that has the power to order other Govt departments around, our own Minister with as much power as in waretime, and soon the fastest access to porn in the country.

Anyhow with the number of streets in CHCH to be repaired the costs of USB should be cheeper due to the ability to coordinate and cooperate with other construction works.

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>