Member log in

Farmers want more money for rural broadband

Federated Farmers is backing the Government's plan for rural broadband but says more money is needed.

Cabinet has signed off the roll-out and work is expected to start on the infrastructure early next year.

The Government is providing $48 million towards the $300m cost and will put a levy on the industry to deliver the rest.

Telecom says its earnings will be hit by costs of $56m a year, and its shares have plunged to a record low.

Federated Farmers chief executive Conor English said last night the Government's plan was "progress in the right direction" but it was just the first step.

"It's great that the Government has listened to Federated Farmers and delivered a plan that will see $300m invested over six years," he said.

"But in our view we are still quite short on the money side -- $300m is a start but we're not sure it will get fast broadband to every rural household and business."

Mr English said $500m would match expenditure levels for urban New Zealand.

"We simply think the Government needs to be much more ambitious for the one million Kiwis defined as 'rural'," her said.

"Federated Farmers is not talking baby steps but wants radical change. It's the ability to harness things like 3D and other leading edge technologies and this demands ultra fast speeds. We should aim high...rural New Zealand should be the envy of the world, not a follower."

Communications and Information Technology Minister Steven Joyce said Telecom had made representations claiming the levy was unfair, and it was entitled to do so.

"But generally, everybody else in the industry and the various user groups felt the approach we are taking was appropriate," he said.

More by NZPA

More on:

Comments and questions
3

Be interesting to know how rural is defined if 25% of NZers are rural. What is wrong with them paying for the readily available satellite system rather than the taxpayer forking out. Rural NZers have lower rates and house prices and do not have to put up with the traffic! Sounds like social welfare to me.

Why should tax payers in the city pay for farmers and life style block owners their internet access. They chose to live in the rural areas and they want similar services like city dwellers? The next thing they want will be Post Office, Pak N Save, Countdown, Warehouse and train stations?

The dairy industry could employ another 900,000 workers if it focessed on end product like Nestle, but farmers dont want city investors cash cause they want to keep it to themselves. Given this clear attitude I say pay your costs yourself if u don't do whats best for NZ as a whole. Reads the Brash report on what the dairy industry is costing NZ!!!

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>