Free audio stream, including stories that are padlocked on our site. Listen on any device, anywhere. Updated twice daily. The audio stream takes several seconds to start on Android devices.Launch Radio player
The Employers and Manufacturers Association (Northern) has fired a return volley in the propaganda war with the left over the controversial 90-day probation law.
The EMA has asked employers from small businesses to email the association with their success stories as part of its battle against scare mongering over the law.
Opponents dubbed it the “fire at will bill” when it was going through parliament, and claimed it stripped employees of their rights.
The Council of Trade Unions is also planning to “name and shame” employers that “exploit” workers using the new law.
"A lot of positive things could come out of the trial employment law but small businesses usually just get on with running their businesses and don't shout about their good news, says David Lowe, Employment Services Manager for EMA.
"But we want to hear about it. By sending in positive stories to the firstname.lastname@example.org email address more facts will come to light about how the law can work well for both employees and employers."
He says since the law came in all we’ve heard so far is that “the sky is about to fall in” without any evidence to back it up.
"But employers know the trial employment law will provide chances for some people to get a job they otherwise wouldn't get.
"Trial employment periods are standard employment practice around the world including Australia and the UK.
"Newjobchance@ema.co.nz gives a place for employers and staff to share good news."
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- CallPlus chickens out of Global Mode, but Aussie ISP signs on
- NZ retailers need to be 'more competitive,' taxing online goods not the answer
- Readers' verdict on Auckland's SkyPath
- Egos and amateur strategy: Ron Mark, Shane Jones and Winston Peters
- On the tragic deaths of a mother and three children – a dissenting view