Fisher-managed Marlin Global faces fight over future from new shareholder

BUSINESSDESK: Marlin Global, the NZX-listed fund managed by Fisher Funds, which invests in international equities, will be wound up, with capital returned to shareholders if investor and rival fund manager Elevation Capital Management gets it way.

Elevation Capital, whose shareholders include Auckland commercial lawyer Andrew Harmos, high-profile fund manager Craig Stobo and founder Christopher Swasbrook, wants Marlin shareholders to support a resolution at the November 1 annual meeting to terminate its management contract with Fisher Funds and liquidate the portfolio.

Elevation managing director Mr Swasbrook says that would see shareholders get a return of about 81 cents per share, a 16% premium to the current trading price of 70 cents.

He says Mr Marlin has "traded at a persistent and sizeable discount to net asset value" in spite of the board setting up a share buy-back and quarterly dividend policy.

"In our opinion, shareholders have little prospect of seeing the current discount close if the status quo prevails," Mr Swasbrook says.

The proposal was put to Marlin chairman Alistair Ryan this week and Marlin yesterday announced it had renewed its management contract with Fisher Funds for a further five years before.

Elevation cashed in on the sell-down of Salvus Strategic Investments' portfolio last year when it acquired a stake in the listed investment company after the board said it was looking at ways of making a capital return. Salvus shareholders eventually voted in favour of liquidating the portfolio and the company, now called Veritas Investments, is looking at ways to achieve a reverse-listing.

Marlin independent directors Ryan and Carol Campbell scotched the proposal, saying Elevation is a rival fund manager and has only been a shareholder for a matter of weeks.

"Shareholders are encouraged to look past this short-term opportunism and focus on the unique opportunity Marlin offers them, the underlying and undoubted quality of the manager and the strong results relative to other international equity options that have been achieved in extremely difficult markets," they say.

Fisher Funds' Carmel Fisher says Elevation's hostile approach was aimed at making a one-off gain and investors should be looking for a long-term investment focus.

In 2009, Marlin shareholders turned down a similar bid from investor Gary Cross, who sought to change the investment company into an open-ended managed fund after the gap between its share price and net asset value widened.

He and his supporters forced Marlin to order an independent report to look at delisting and restructuring, and said ways the investment vehicle could improve its NAV were through share buy-back schemes, implementing a managed dividend policy, or winding up.

As at October 9, Marlin's net asset value was 83.34 cents after deducting treasury stock from the buy-back programme. Its five biggest assets are Germany's Biotest, Stratec Biomedical and Tom Tailor Holdings, Israil's Sarin Technologies and USA's Orthofix.

Marlin wrote down 80% of its stake in recycling paper company Fook Woo after the Hong Kong-listed firm was suspended from trading amid allegations of fraud. Fook Woo accounts for about 1% of the Marlin portfolio.

Comments on this story have been disabled because of the potentially defamatory nature of some of them – Editor

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

9 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Yuck, what a horrible offer, Marlin pays a good Dividend, especially if your DRP-ing it. I don't want to see this stock liquidated. 81c is pathetic. This smells like a raid.


Yes it is a blatant raid. Elevation bought in around 70c and want to liquidate for some quick easy cash. Shareholders should ignore them.


Put in a dollar and it's now worth 70 cents if you want to exit.

In the case of Barramundi, put in $1 and it's now worth 65 cents.

So 30% and 35% capital losses after 5 years and you are saying it's a good dividend stock???????


Marlin pays a good dividend? You call the return of your own capital a good dividend?


That all depends on your buy in price, doesn't it.


That applies to all stocks.

From a performance appraisal point of view however, it is the track record of the manager from day 1 and over the last 5 years.

There is no justification for Fisher Fund to continue managing Marlin - they have not delivered and there have been many changes of staff.


Marlin has traded at a discount for 5 years now, time this puppy was closed down


Should at least delist it and manage like a fund which should eliminate the discount and not alter the dividend. It has been a consistent poor performer since inception (remember we paid a buck per share!). It has changed its portfolio manger recently so who knows what it is going to do in the future. The Elevation proposal should be taken seriously as ithas alot of merit.


Look at the Marlin track record .. listed at 1.00 now at 70c ..yes they pay a dividend .. but they have never got back to par .. when milford and a lot of other funds are well ahead.
Marlin board and management - must be accountable for a well below average.


Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7765 -0.0013 -0.17%
AUD 0.9512 -0.0004 -0.04%
EUR 0.6326 -0.0002 -0.03%
GBP 0.4960 -0.0004 -0.08%
HKD 6.0164 -0.0161 -0.27%
JPY 92.3910 -0.1540 -0.17%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1198.3 8.880 2014-12-18T00:
Oil Brent 59.3 -1.910 2014-12-18T00:
Oil Nymex 54.4 -2.430 2014-12-18T00:
Silver Index 15.9 0.010 2014-12-18T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5518.5 5545.0 5518.5 0.22%
NASDAQ 4712.4 4748.4 4644.3 2.24%
DAX 9711.6 9811.1 9544.4 2.79%
DJI 17367.8 17778.4 17356.9 2.43%
FTSE 6336.5 6466.0 6336.5 2.04%
HKSE 23158.3 23185.8 22832.2 1.44%
NI225 17511.0 17551.1 17210.0 1.78%