Folic acid in bread: Minister says decision made on consumer choice, not science
Food Safety Minister Kate Wilkinson says consumer choice is more important than science when it comes to deciding on folic acid in bread.
After an eight-week consultation process, Ms Wilkinson says the fortification of bread with folic acid will remain voluntary.
“The decision that was made was really made on consumer choice rather than the science,” Ms Wilkinson told TVNZ's Q+A programme testerday.
Paediatric Society's Dr Andrew Marshall says making folic acid mandatory would prevent 10-20 birth defects, such as spina bifida, a year. The govenment had missed an opportunity.
Food and Grocery Council head Katherine Rich opposes mandatory fortification, which she calls "government tampering". Opponents have also pointed to studies that suggest a possible cancer risk associated with folic acid.
Ms Wilkinson did not take a side in the scientific debate.
"My decision was made based on the result of the submissions," she said. Of 134 submissions, 88 favoured voluntary fortification.
"I’m not a scientist. The submissions clearly showed consumer choice was the most preferred option."
The minister says she didn’t know where the Paediatrics Society got its numbers from regarding how many children will get neural tube defects, but noted the “overwhelming response was that consumers wanted choice”.
Without giving a timeline, Ms Wilkinson says she expects bread makers to fortifying 50% of all bread.
The government is also assessing other measures, such as subsidised folic acid tablets.
Watch the full interview here.
RAW DATA: Q+A TRANSCRIPT
GREG BOYED INTERVIEWS KATE WILKINSON
GREG BOYED
You might remember the fuss three years back. Kate Wilkinson came on Q+A to explain why she was making it mandatory to put folic acid in our bread even though she didn’t want to. A week later, Prime Minister John Key came on to say National was rethinking. Well, on Thursday National finally announced folic acid in bread would remain voluntary. Folic acid champions were furious, with the Organisation for Rare Disorders saying, ‘Up to 20 babies every year will die or be disabled thanks to the government’s decision.’ A big call. So we spoke to Food Safety Minister Kate Wilkinson in her Rangiora electorate office on Friday and began by asking if her decision was influenced by fears that mandatory fortification could raise the risk of cancer in some New Zealanders.
KATE WILKINSON – Food Safety Minister
No, it didn’t, really. We went out for an eight-week consultation, and the clear result of that was that consumers wanted choice, and that’s why we’ve made it voluntary.
GREG Ok, because on this programme three years ago, you said the science around this and the risk of cancer were not robust - was the word you used. So you’re now confident that there is no risk of cancer as a result of folic acid in bread.
KATE The decision that was made was really based on consumer choice rather than the science, because, as you know with science, you can have scientists arguing black and scientists arguing white. At the end of the day, the consultation went out. The submissions were clearly in favour of voluntary, so people can make up their own mind whether they want folic acid in their bread or not.
GREG Surely, though, the science is a very, very important part of this decision.
KATE Uh, well, consumer choice was really the one that made the most difference in terms of the decision. When you’ve got two thirds of the submitters actually wanting that choice, rather than debating the science, then that’s what we listened to.
GREG On the science side of it, though, David Smith, Professor Emeritus of Pharmacology from Oxford University, told us the last time we spoke to him about six weeks ago putting folic acid in bread could increase the risk by several hundred cases a year of cancer. What do you say to that? Do you agree with that thinking? Disagree with it?
KATE Well, my decision was made based on the result of the submissions. I’m not a scientist. The submissions clearly showed consumer choice was the most preferred option.
GREG But surely you have to consider that safety must be an issue. On one side, potentially several hundred cases a year of cancer as a result of this being in bread. Surely there has to be a consideration.
KATE Well, I think some of that science was looked at, definitely. But my decision was made on consumer choice because that was overwhelmingly the feeling of the submitters.
GREG Minister, I’m just a bit lost here. I would have thought science and the safety of people and risk of cancer would be the first thing before anything came down to consumer choice.
KATE Well, as you said before, though, Greg, some scientists are saying there’s no risk whatsoever. Some scientists may say there’s a risk. My decision was, actually, ‘I’m not qualified to make that decision.’ But I am charged with looking at the submissions, putting out the consultation - which I did - and the overwhelming majority wanted consumer choice. So then it’s up to consumers then to decide whether they want to have bread that has been fortified with folic acid, or whether they don’t.
GREG Actually, on that point, you have asked consumers. Last year, the New Zealand Food Safety Authority - these are your own experts - and I’ve got this in front of me. Women are asked to rank their knowledge of folic acid from one to 10. One knowing nothing, 10 knowing a lot. More than half put either zero, one or two. Only half knew folic acid was actually needed during pregnancy. They don’t know, they’re not informed, yet you’ve made the decision.
KATE Uh, well, this is only one of a suite of measures that we’re taking in relation to folic acid. Because, you know, I have to say that whenever there’s an NTD baby, you know, that’s tragic, and it’s tragic for the family, and we want to do what we can to avoid that. And, of course, folic acid has been seen as one of those contributing factors that can avoid NTD babies and defects. But what we’ve done is we’ve made it voluntary so that people can read the label and they can make their own decision whether or not they want bread that’s been fortified with folic acid or not.
GREG No one would disagree with that. One case of NTD, of course, is tragic.
KATE Absolutely.
GREG Andrew Marshall from the Paediatric Society has said this could decrease the risk by up to 24 cases a year. What do you say to that?
KATE I’m not quite sure where he gets his figures from. But as part of the suite that we’re looking at, we’re working closely with Health. We’re working on educational material, we’re working with the industry and the bakers so that they will be fortifying up to 50% of their bread lines with folic acid. We’ve got subsidised prescription folic acid tablets. So there’s a suite of processes that we can use to help to educate women and those that are wanting to get pregnant as to the benefits of folic acid.
GREG He’s from the Paediatric Society, and his figures are from worldwide research. Presumably you must see that that’s fairly robust. 24 cases possibly decreased or most certainly decreased if folic acid is put in bread. How do you not do it?
KATE We’re still allowing folic acid to be put in bread.
GREG Voluntarily.
KATE As I said, the bakers will be putting it in. 50% is their aim, to put it in 50% of the bread lines. It’s already in about 17% now, and we’ve noticed even in the last couple of years since we’ve had the Folic Acid Working Group. MPI are working with health professionals and the industry, and that’s actually resulted in an increased folate level in women. So, actually, the voluntary fortification that’s been going on already has been making a difference.
GREG The Paediatric Society who are pushing for this say if it is put in as mandatory, it will decrease by up to 24 cases a year instances of NTD in babies. How do you ignore those numbers?
KATE We’re not ignoring those numbers, but what we’re saying is that voluntary fortification is one step that we can take to help address the issue.
GREG Then why didn’t you make it mandatory, then? That’s the question everyone’s going to be asking you. If you believe the science, the science is there. It’s black and white. 24 cases less a year that could be prevented of children born with spina bifida or NTDs, and you’re not doing it.
KATE Well, actually, we went out to consultation, and consultation is about listening to the submitters and listening to what the population want, and the overwhelming response was that consumers wanted choice.
GREG What about the mums, the families of possibly 24 children a year who are born with NTDs who, of course, wanted a choice with a healthy baby? What do you say to them?
KATE Well, they can have a choice to have bread that’s fortified with folic acid, and if we can educate women especially as to the benefits of folic acid, and they’ve got a choice of 50% of the breads that they buy will be fortified with folic acid, then they can make an educated decision, and we think that will make a difference.
GREG But your findings have already been that most women don’t know the benefits of having folic acid in their bread, in their diet. Are you going to go some way to making sure they do know if you’re not going to make this mandatory?
KATE Yeah, that’s part of the tool, which, as I mentioned earlier, was education.
GREG How? What are you going to do?
KATE Uh, well, you can have posters up in doctors’ surgeries for a start. You can have television advertising.
GREG What’s that going to cost, Minister? What sort of budget are you putting aside for that? Roughly, what sort of cost?
KATE And the media. You can actually help and educate women. Programmes like this is also helping to educate women as to the benefits of folic acid. We’re not saying you can’t have it. We’re just making it voluntary.
GREG Research has shown, Minister, about 3 cents or 4 cents a loaf as a mandatory thing, folic acid in there. That’s not much of a cost to the bread industry. It’s not going to be much of a cost to the consumer that they’ll notice. You’re talking 3 or 4 cents. Surely that’s a more effective and cheaper way of doing this.
KATE As I’ve said, though, the decision that I made was based on the result of the submission that was about consumer choice. It wasn’t about cost.
GREG And the choice of the 24 or so children who are born annually with NTDs, they don’t have a choice; it’s been made for them.
KATE Their parents, their mothers, will have a choice and will be educated. And we are hopeful and confident that that education will actually impress upon women the advantages of having extra folic acid in case of pregnancies.
GREG Food Safety Minister Kate Wilkinson there. Let’s just revise those numbers slightly. The Ministry of Primary Industries initially said 20 to 24 NTDs possibly a year. They’re now saying 14 to 20. Let’s keep that in mind.






















Comments and questions35
The Minister was pathetic this morning. If this government is going to govern by consumer / voter choice then halt the asset sales, lift the age of buying alcohol - oh right there is no money in it for their mates on those ones.
A principled National MP who believes in small government, as her party supposedly does, would've got to this decision purely from philosophy. I am so over the Hive.
More dislikes than likes. So, we don't want principled MP's following the actual philosophies of their party. We just vote them in and then they just, at best, do random 'stuff', or at worst, as here, try to implement the will of the tyranny of the majority?
Hah. Definitely the null minds required for the semi-police state to operate. Well done my little proles. Dislike. Dislike. Dislike.
I usually support this government, but Wilkinson is a pathetic Minister. No leadership. I could have got 40 people to write in and she would have made it compulsory? Ridiculous. Business thru FGC lobby is too strong. That is real reason.
The Minister is absolutely correct.
Pregnant women see Doctors and nurses, and they have parents. I believe if they are sooo stoopid (and yes plenty are) they don't.know they should be taking folic acid supplement, then surely a Doctor?, a Nurse?, or a Parent? could draw them a picture that they understand???
Wow John Morrison. This is the stupidest comment I have read in many years. There are many women who have unplanned pregnancies, and not all live with their parents / have parents / see doctors until 12 weeks of pregnancy has been completed. Folic acid fortification is already in practice in several countries, with high education rates. Not many take or remember to include a multivitamin in their daily routine. Fortification helps to speak on behalf of unborn children.
And how many women would that be, counting yourself, that you want 4 million people dosed?
Wilkinson is a wuss and as such despite all the alternative methods of education and advice the country and some parents & children will suffer a life of misery. The average koiwoi is a dumb oaf and no amount of money or campaigns will have them do the right thing. We see the return of goitre because its now fashionable to have uniodized salt and again the fashion for not innoculating children. Stupid is as stupid does.
Goitre and lack of innoculation is not lack of education, it is countereducation.
contereducation ? sounds like trying to justify mumbo jumbo.
Yeah - crystals and dream catchers will solve it all.
Yeah Countereducation. Science and Public Health say vaccines are good for you unequivocally. People begin to have health problems, and then some people get the idea that vaccines are bad for you and sea salt is good for you, and this is related to your problem. So....some people follow that brand of thinking. There will not be one kind of hierarchical thinking on this earth much longer. People will vary, and their actions will vary. Calling people "stupid" will not make people come to your position. You have to learn to live with people who don't think like you.
I dont want no folic acid in my bread, i heard it can burn your osoffakiss.
Your grammar and spelling match your logic.
I think anon was making a subtle joke
Headline should be: Food Safety Minister Wilkinson commits public health malpractive by ignoring unambigious science to make folic acid policy that will cause New Zealand children to die early and/or live their lives in wheelchairs. How can a Food Safety Minister make food policy that so endangers the public health? Isn't such action an abdication of responsibility?
.
It's not endangering anyone's else: not one intelligent mother and her baby. Enacting it, however, takes the choice away of every single individual who buys bread. The philosophical malpractice is far, far, more serious for the precedent it sets.
I cant agree, choice remains. Just as mass innoculation of all schoolchildren exists the opportunity to opt out as stupid as that maybe exists also . So too with vitamin enriched food like milk & bread. Those who want to opt out have real hassle free alternatives.
Not hassle free at all if I just want to go buy a loaf of bread. The West no longer understands the concepts of:
Choice, freedom, liberty.
I've got the choice of 6x different bread retailers and countless brands and types all within 5 minutes walk. Where do you live?
My understanding is it would have meant folic acid in all breads, regardless of producer: yes/no?
I applaud the Minister. Some people with MTHFR mutations cannot use folic Acid. Others cannot convert folic acid to folinic acid which the body actually uses.
Foisting folic acid on some people to help other people doesn't make sense. Educating and giving options sounds like a thoughtful solution.
Strange that the very folk anti this 'fiddling with food' spend inordinate time and money in those health shops buying supplements. Vitamin B9 is necessary for good fetal development, just like those who overdose on Vit C and buy multivitamins, you excrete what you dont need.
Mind you the counter argument is that modern medicine is ruining the human species natural selection and we shouldn't mass medicate as there are some that best die ...for the greater good of the human race after all..choke.
And... the MTHFS mutation may cause some people to be unable to tolerate folinic acid as well. So "No" to forcing the taking of supplements.
That's great news, Thank You Minister.
Like 99% of the population, I don't want chemicals compulsorily injected into my food and I don't want the state telling me what to eat.
Freedom of Choice!
99% of a survey of you and friend.
53.7% of survey results are just made up & 78% of them have a decimal point just to look impressive.
Any pregnant woman with a brain knows they take folic acid during pregnancy. Subjecting the rest of us to this additive is utter rubbish. Plus, do you know how much bread a pregnant woman would have to eat to get the recommended dose? Look it up! A pill or powder is much easier and targets the real people who need it. It's amazing this debate even got started. What a load of bollocks.
Finding a woman with a brain is the problem especially if they are practising getting pregnant.
As a male, I can't gestate children. (like duh!), so why should I be forced to eat folic acid in my bread when there is absolutely no gestational benefit for me to do so? I don't want to eat folic acid in my bread. While the science around folate and neural tube defects is largely settled, the role of folic acid causing cancer in humans is not. It is incorrect to say therefore that the science supports mass medicating the entire population with folic acid. Given this uncertainty, the Minister made the right decision by allowing consumers the choice.
So as a male you must be pleased that nature has made NZ deficient in Selenium unlike other parts of the world so the mass population isn't forced to eat food with this mineral essential to mens health. With good education and various campaigns an intelligent person such as yourself is definately buying and taking it as a supplement aren't you?
I'd rather eat Brazil nuts (2 a day) which are an excellent source of absorbable selenium. Most of the selenium taken in pill form is not absorbed by the gut. You did know that, right?
You are a plonker. Brazil nuts contain phytic acid which interferes with the bodies ability to absorb stuff like calcium, iron etc. Best you go back to Dr Google.
the science around cancer has been discredited by studies. in the US they have found a significant decrease in strokes that may be attributable to manditory fortification. So maybe there is a benefit for you as a male. I also hope that you or your family never have to suffer this condition in family members. Remember males become dads and granddads so it does effect us also.
This minister is so insipid in all she does. She needs a huge dose of folic acid just for starters......
Why not compromise? Use citric acid instead of folic.