Member log in

Fonterra wins crucial change to let TAF go forward

BUSINESSDESK: Fonterra appears to have passed another crucial hurdle on the way to the June 25 special vote on the proposed Trading Among Farmers initiative to create publicly investable units in the co-operative which runs New Zealand's largest global business.

Parliament's primary production select committee report-back on the Dairy Industry Restructuring Amendment Bill has deleted a clause which Fonterra said would have stopped TAF in its tracks, by preventing Fonterra from acting against any attempted winding up of the Fonterra Shareholders Fund, which will issue units in the proposed $500 million fund.

The offending clause said Fonterra "must not engage in any conduct that limits the ability of unitholders to liquidate the fund".

Fonterra had warned the provision as originally drafted "cannot be accepted, and would prevent Fonterra from launching TAF".

Select committee chairman Shane Ardern said there had been fundamental changes to Section 109, which contained the clause, mainly because the Commerce Commission had complained it made watchdog role on the milk price-setting process ambiguous.

Most of the bill deals with creating a robust, transparent system of regulation for setting the Farmgate Milk Price, the calculation at the heart of the way Fonterra determines its 10,500 farmers' income from their dairying operations.

Farmers fear the FMP could be manipulated by investors in the tradable units to favour dividends, rather than payouts to farmers based on milk production, and the new process is intended to prevent that.

The Labour and Green parties both issued dissenting minority reports, with the Labour position supported by New Zealand First, and the Greens arguing opportunities had been lost to incentivise sustainable dairy production in the new capital structure.

Labour questioned the need for TAF and criticised how little time it said the select committee had to consider the draft legislation, whose passage is one of five "bottom line" necessities for TAF to go ahead.

Labour argued the bill should contain provisions limiting "the proportion of Fonterra share securities that can be traded in the market by non-suppliers".

Fonterra will ask farmer shareholders to enshrine constitutionally an upper limit of 20% for the Fonterra Shareholders Fund, although it would be managed within a seven to 12% range as a matter of policy, with a fully disclosed process when those thresholds are breached.

Nonetheless, Labour said this "could lead to pressure to demutualise the company. We believe such a protection for the co-operative is needed in law".

A Fonterra spokeswoman said the company was studying the report-back before commenting.

Comments and questions
7

Please, could someone please explain why a business man who freely chooses to direct his wit, capital and labour into milk production should enjoy so much privileged legislation over say a business man who chooses to direct his wit, capital and energy into say, a freight truck, a logging business or widget production?
I think we should be told.

John, please buy a dairy farm and enjoy the advantages I have as a dairy farmer! Come share in our "privilege"
Be a price taker, not a price maker, it so much more challenging.

Simple, without Fonterra the NZ economy would be in a parlous state. Thank god for peasants - they save us again!

Nonsense. John Morrison is right. Small business, other than those protected by long outdated socialist structures in primary production, are buggered in this country. They get no support from government, and get strangled in red tape and bureacracy and our stupid labour laws. That's why those with any smarts and ambition go to OZ. It may be tougher there, but the market potential is at least five times greater than NZ.

Would someone explain to me how farmers are protected by long outdated socialist structures - where have you been Lindsay for the last 25 years ?

Oh! And what do you call the "DIRA" legislation? Free enterprise? Level playing field? All business sectors equal in the eyes of the Crown?
Please tell me.

SO, you are saying that peeps demand for dairy products is a direct result of Parliaments creation of Fonterra? Well well! I don't agree, but if you are right, then by golly we do have some clever polis that put it together, don't we?
Personally I believe the creation of Fonterra was a step down the socialist path that has been travelled before all round the world and ALWAYS ended in tears. Except of course for the authors.