Member log in

Funding crisis stalls $140m state home development

The $140 million McLennan development at Papakura including 145 state homes has been called to a halt due to a lack of funding.

McConnell Property took over the 24-ha site from Housing New Zealand with the promise of dedicating one third of the homes to state housing.

The developers have a funding partnership with Dutch ABN Amro, backed by the Royal Bank of Scotland, but McLennan requires presale private investors and not one section has sold.

Of the 450 homes each worth $420,000, 145 homes were to be dedicated to Housing New Zealand.

Of that, 13% of the development was to be allocated to state housing, and another 15% towards affordable housing under the Gateway scheme.

Housing New Zealand is now seeking further funding from private investors.

Construction was due to be completed next year, but has not moved past planning as McConnell have been unable to find a single buyer for Stage One.

“It has been a struggle to get funding,” McConnell general manager Martin Udale says, explaining that with no sales, presale targets have not been met. “More than that, it is not the right time in the market to launch a new project.”

Housing New Zealand general manager of assets Kevin Mara says, “We have our own funding and may also look at what might happen with the Gateway scheme, but other private investors will play a major part in this.”

“To get new projects off the ground, there are presale requirements. To start a new project with a total 450 dwellings requires a fair level of presale,” Mr Udale says. “The market is not in the right place.”

Mr Mara says that the premise Housing NZ agreed to was that private sales would help McConnell to fund the development. “Because the market is so bad, they could not achieve sales. We could not get our houses out of the subdivision, and could not proceed.”

The Housing NZ portion of homes within the development would be of the same style and quality as other privately purchased homes, and “pepper-potted” throughout the community.

Schools, early childhood services, sports fields and open spaces are also planned to be built into McLennan.

“The project was going to have a ‘sustainable’ angle, but I hate that word. It almost sounds ‘green’,” Mr Udale says. “It is something you have to be conscious of, developments done well should be sustainable.”

Mr Udale says, “With this sustainable community, government and Housing New Zealand are keen to demonstrate the ability to create new mixed tenure places.”

Mr Mara says that Housing NZ is looking at how to take “controlling interest is not the right word, but, how Housing NZ will position ourselves” to get the development in to action.

“This is not going to be a government funded development. We will continue talking to the current developers,” says Mr Mara. “McConnell has performed exceptionally well so far, and we don’t want to force them in to position of financial hardship.”

Mr Udale says that he hopes to see construction started by June, with Stage One completed by November of this year.

Mr Mara says that the project “is not going to be resolved in the near future”.

“The focus now is on how to share risk returns and rewards, to find a structure of arrangement that is a win-win situation, to use old hackneyed phrases,” Mr Udale says.

“I think everybody is putting their best foot forward on the project. We will between us resolve a way forward on the project over the next two or three months, then proceed,” says Mr Udale.

More by Jazial Crossley

Comments and questions
11

Unfortunately, building state houses into a subdivision is the kiss of death to potential purchasers.

“The project was going to have a ‘sustainable’ angle, but I hate that word. It almost sounds ‘green’,” Mr Udale says. “It is something you have to be conscious of, developments done well should be sustainable.”

One wonders if Mr Udale has seen any of the residential development in Albany in recent years...

Sometime you wonder whether state housing is needed in all new developments? Who would want to live in the neighbourhood of poorly kept gardens, stray dogs and broken down cars? May be low cost walk-up flats need to be built close to all existing or planned flea markets for state tenants like some populated countries!

To the above author I would suggest that you visit Rototuna and look at the HNZC houses there. You will be shocked,however not by the flea ridden tenants however the very opposite. These are homes that were pepper potted through an affluent middle class growth suburb. When I met my clients in Rototuna in order to recognize the HNZC property I looked out for the home with the Volvo and the jet boat parked out the front!

I met another family who immigrated from the Congo. There were 5 children and another on the way. The house looked like a showroom with brand new furniture, The children were immaculately dressed in stylish French outfits.

Another fanmily obviously had no spare cash as there were 6 chilren under 16 however the house was immaculate ana the Sunday roast lunch was on and the children waited patiently , shiney and fresh in the second living room whilst I toured the investors through their home.

HNZC is very careful as as to which of their clients they house in beautiful neighbourhoods. As the largest Land lord in New Zealand the last thing that they want is to be hassled by unappreciative neighbours. This happened in Tauranga where the ratio of HNZC homes to the general housing populus was one in 10 in a new subdivision in Northridge. There was a lot of neighbourhood furour and newspaper commentary and the ratio was immediately dropped to 5%.

My investor clients do not contact me post purchase with concerns. This means that their investment is as passive as I promote it as.

Once one of my investors got contacted by the HNZC tenancy manager to ask if the tenant could put a herb garden in and another to see if they could paint the fence!.

Unfortunately there is a stigma to HNZC tenants which is not actually reflected in the majority of cases. A couple of bad eggs spoil the carton. However these people do not earn the rights of nice homes and seem to stay in older rough homes and not get referred to the new homes in good areas such as the development written about in this article.

We sold a block of units to investors in Hamilton. The tenants are elderly and house proud with immaculate units complete with ornaments in the windows. You couldnt wish for better tenants and have the complete security of knowing knowing that your rent will be paid at market rates 52 weeks of the year for leases as long as 35 years!.

Tanya Kwasza Catalyst2

You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Of course state housing should be included in new developments - pepper-potting is well known to produce positive social outcomes.

"poorly kept gardens, stray dogs and broken down cars" are also found in areas that do not have any state houses - maybe even your own!

HNZ plays an important part in ensuring New Zealanders have a place to live when needed. Lets just hope that you don't loose your house in this recession as I can't imagine many people would want you living next door to them...

I think you may be the one who has no idea what you are talking about.

I suggest a trip around state housing area, and you will, if your eyes work, see the broken down cars etc.

It is very apparent here in Gisborne , come for a visit if you don't have state housing where you live.
Visit Munro Street and see the Gang occupied houses , and learn what the real world is like.

yes !!to ..the person who wrote the last comment ...

Strange idea of "proper-potting"... You can not just force people to certain neighbourhoods. That's one of the reasons poeple do not buy. Who would? That's the way it is.

And why do "state houses" need to be houses? Too flashy, I would say. Why not appartment blocks? If I cannot afford to buy/rent a house, I choose an apartment, right?

Because it has a stupid hard to spell name and a guarantee of notoroius south Auckland State housing tenants living next you. These people are just idiots.

and "stylish french oufits". Good to see HNZ has selected quality tenants. It does however beg the question is why are these people in HNZC houses in the first place??? Obviously the money saved has bought these items ha ha

What's interesting though is while HNZ is not blameless in this stuff, the WORST of all are the privately-owned tenancies. We live in a four bedroom B&T house, which was built new as a renter. OPur neighbourhood is about 85 per cent renter and 97 per cent transient. The houses are mostly private with a couple of HNZ potted-in. Ours are the only faces constant in the street. Our neighbours mostly move out in the evening with little or no warning - the really clever ones do it on Christmas Eve so their landlords don't get onto them for a good few days by which time they are good and gone.
As a tenant, I enjoy the house we rent, which we are at pains to look after. As landlord to two properties in other parts of New Zealand, I appreciate "good" tenants. As a realist I know they are few and far between.
Consider if you will the Salt family, toxic neigthbours who have given HNZ notice - ponder for a moment what some poor sucker of a private landlord is about to experience with THAT little tribe of upright citizens. No Volvos and jet boats there eh!