Give us a government guarantee, say KiwiSavers
A week after a survey found many New Zealanders think KiwiSaver is government-guaranteed, another survey has revealed the lack of a guarantee is one of the main concerns people have about the scheme.
Last week a UMR Research poll found that nearly half (48%) of people in KiwiSaver thought their fund was government-guaranteed and 35% were unsure.
But Mercer’s KiwiSaver Sentiment Study has found that the lack of a guarantee is one of the major concerns about KiwiSaver.
Other concerns centred on a lack of understanding of the scheme, poor returns and a preference for greater control over personal finances.
Martin Lewington, head of Mercer New Zealand, said expecting some form of guarantee over KiwiSaver funds was unrealistic.
“We always say if you want a government guarantee go and invest in government bonds – but as Greece shows even that may not be completely safe.”
The survey found a rise in people expecting life in retirement to be less comfortable than it is today, up to 49% compared to 42% when Mercer did the survey in 2007 just before KiwiSaver was introduced.
It found that about half (49%) of people were happy with their current KiwiSaver provider and only 5% were looking to change schemes within 12 months,
National’s introduction of a 2% contribution level has proven popular; 29% indicated they either plan to make or already make contributions at the 2% level, while 46% plan to do so at the 4% level.
“The economic events of the last two years have provided a reality check for many New Zealanders in terms of how prepared they are for retirement,” Mr Lewington said.
“By the same token, these events along with the introduction of KiwiSaver have also prompted Kiwis to become more astute and engaged with their retirement planning.”
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit














Comments and questions5
There should be a stright bank deposit option paying 90 day bill rate and no fees- I bet most would go for it and it could be guaranteed- greedy invrestment companies hate the stright forward approach- theses no money to rip off
It was annoying to read this comment from Martin Lewington, head of Mercer New Zealand. Why is not possible for a goverment proposed savings scheme not to be gauranteed? In the UK the employment provident is gauranteed, in Singapore the employees provident fund is gauranteed by the goverment. The question I beg to ask is if I was to borrow money from the bank and I am unable to pay this back I get sued and the money recovered at all costs but it is bazare when I give my hard earned money to to somebody for safe keeping and invested for profits and when the proverbial happens I am unable to get this back . The traditional model of financial Institions is archiec, the consumer must have the same powers to get back their investements and this applys to the Kiwi Saver as well.
The government (that's you and me) could guaranteee KiwiSaver Funds but the guarantee should not be free. That probably means (to make the guaranteee affordable) that the fund will be in low-risk, low-earning assets with higher than average charges (to pay for the guarantee). I say, give people the choice.
Good grief people. Do you think money comes from thin air? Govt Guarantee for what??? Your retirement??? Get a big lunchbox. I am 49. By the time I am 70 the tax base supporting people in my age bracket will be less 20% of the population. You all want to live off your grandkids because you cant take responsibility to look after your own retirement savings. Cancel Sky people and create your own fund. Live within your means (there is a concept). And as an aside. What do you do when it turns to custard at 65 ... doesnt give you much time to recover does it. TAKE RESPONSIBILITY!!!!
Stephen you are right on the money with you last comment. The GFC is a reality check for NZers and it is essential we all take responsibility for our own futures. If we continue to take/ask for money from the tax payer, what happens when the working population is a marginal fraction of the total population? That's right, higher taxes OR changes to tax regimes OR less Govt funding. As more baby-boomers retire (yes those who have worked hard all their lives to get us into our current financial situation!) There is too much of the what about me instead of considering the what about our future generations. What incentive will there be for our children to work in New Zealand if what they get is a bloated retired population and those on the dole, only to know they will be taxed heavily for doing so. The grass in Australia will keep looking greener unfortunately - no government guarantees there, but the working population is saving significantly for their retirement years! Lets learn from our mistakes from the past and take on reality now before it is too late.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below