It seems executive craze of 2012 is to lay out heart on your sleeve – and extract a little utu – with a public resignation letter.
Goldman Sachs executive director Greg Smith quit yesterday.
His bosses could read about it in the paper.
Mr Smith wrote a guest editorial for The New York Times lacerating his company. He alleged it now puts its own financial interests ahead of those of clients, who were often described as “muppets”.
The byline tartly notes, Greg Smith is resigning today as a Goldman Sachs executive director.
Mr Smith’s very public attack on his employer came on the heels of a similar diatribe from one James Whittaker, an executive who says he keynoted four Google events during his time with the company as a director of engineering.
Since co-founder Larry Page took over as CEO last year, Google had lost its innovative culture. The company had become obsessed by a series of misguided efforts to peg back Facebook's lead in social networking.
Products like Wave, Buzz and Google+ were "half-assed", and the company had become overly focused on ads.
"Truth is I’ve never been much on advertising," Mr Whittaker wrote.
"I don’t click on ads. When Gmail displays ads based on things I type into my email message it creeps me out."
Mr Smith’s parting shot makes thumping good read, as does Mr Whittaker's.
A little biff back
But, as ever, there are two sides to every story.
In Mr Whittaker's case, more cynical observers will note he is now employed by Microsoft – a Google rival that holds a stake in Facebook.
And this morning, through the Wall Street Journal and other media, Goldman Sachs hit back at Mr Smith.
Chief executive Lloyd Blankfein implied Mr Smith had exaggerated his standing at the company.
His title was vice president, but thousands at the 30,000-employee company hold that title. And while Mr Smith was in charge of a derivatives division that spanned continents, he was the sole staff member working in that division.
The Journal also notes that Mr Smith’s smaller bonus this year was, apparently, “a point of friction.”
Que Sera, Que Sera
Google has always been laser-focused on ad revenue.
And allegations of greed at Goldman pre-date Lloyd Blankfein's CEO run during the global financial crisis.
Wall Street broker and banks' alleged disregard for clients was the subject of the 1980s classic Liar's Poker.
And as business blogger Joshua Brown noted today, rumours of malfeasance at Goldman date back to the 1920s.
It could be, perhaps, that Google and Goldman Sachs have not changed that much, at least in the past two years.
But Mr Smith and Mr Whittaker might have become a little jaded.
Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs - Greg Smith (New York Times)
Why I left Google - James Whittaker (official Microsoft blog)
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Infratil still aspires to total shareholder returns of 20% a year
- Wynyard announces huge loss but still a going concern say directors
- OPINION: The ComCom should be able to put behavioural conditions on mergers
- NZ dollar falls as traders ponder whether Yellen will dent kiwi-yield story
- Proposed Broadcasting Act changes to affect Netflix and Lightbox ‘sensible,’ lawyer says
Most listened to
- Labour MP Clare Curran says new rules for Netflix and Lightbox are a 'no brainer'
- China launches ‘uncrackable’ satellite while Syria’s regime strengthens on Foreign Affairs Scope with Nathan Smith
- The Commerce Commission should be able to put conditions on mergers, Labour MP Clare Curran says
- Metlifecare's Glen Sowry on why the company pays caregivers more
- John Key says demand for New Zealand as a holiday destination is not even close to drying up