Opposition parties are going to fight the Government over its plan to raise GST and don't accept assurances that the new tax regime will be fair on low income families.
Prime Minister John Key yesterday told Parliament that increasing GST to 15 percent was being "carefully considered" and would bring in about $2 billion to fund income tax cuts and other reforms.
The Government intends making across the board income tax cuts and raising more revenue from property investors.
Mr Key said the package had the potential to bring in $3-4 billion, which gave the Government room to move.
Nothing is set in stone and the tax changes will be announced in the May 20 budget, with measures to balance the GST increase and protection for low income families and pensioners.
Labour is assuming high income earners will benefit the most through what it says will be a huge cut in the top 38 cents tax rate.
"The essence of National's plan is a massive cut to the top tax rate, apparently funded mainly by a rise in GST," said Labour's finance spokesman David Cunliffe.
"National is trying to claim it will help low-income Kiwis, but no one believes that.
"Families struggling to raise three kids and pay for the week's groceries are frightened."
Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said raising GST would entrench inequality.
"Increasing tax on the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich ... this is a scam that will only benefit the wealthy," he said.
Labour and the Greens will keep this up until the budget because the figures will not come out until then and the Government won't be able to prove its case until they do.
The Government's aim, explained by Mr Key, is to boost economic growth and living standards through a series of changes that include a big increase in money for research and development.
It also wants to encourage saving rather than spending, and hopes investment will increase as people have more money through income tax cuts.
"The Government would not embark on a policy of increasing GST unless it would benefit the New Zealand economy in the long term, and unless it saw the vast bulk of New Zealanders better off," he said.
Mr Key ruled out a land tax or a capital gains tax, two other options put up by the Tax Working Group that examined the system and delivered recommendations to the Government last month.
Business groups said the tax reforms would promote economic growth and plug holes in the system.
"It is encouraging to see that the Government has a plan and is sticking to it," said Business NZ chief executive Phil O'Reilly.
"Lower income tax and an increase in GST, with benefit adjustments to ease the transition, will be helpful for business growth and competitiveness, and fairer to all."
The business sector would have liked a cut in the company tax rate, which the Government is understood to be considering in the longer term.
Council of Trade Unions economist Bill Rosenberg described the announcement as a missed opportunity to boost jobs and make the tax system fairer.
"This will only further encourage the development of the 'emerging underclass' he (Mr Key) speaks about. The priority should be to reduce inequality, not increase it," he said.
Comments
If you cant afford to raise
If you cant afford to raise three kids, then you shouldn't have three kids. Try planning, forward thinking and not living outside your means and blaming the government for your own short falls.
just my rant for people that think they have some sort of "entitlement" to a benefit just because they have kids they cant afford to raise.
Government should just take kids parents cant afford to raise and put them in foster care.
send a message if you cant afford kids then don't have them.
What about being fair on those on 38 % tax bracket. Why should they have to pay more tax just because they have worked hard to achieve a good income for themselves?
Low Earner Syndrome
Why do politicians and journalists (Bernard Hickey etc) bring everything down to how low earners will get one when changes are made or even suggested?
NZ will never get within a bulls roar of Australia or anywhere else while we have this "poor me attitude" all the time. The problem is between our ears folks, it's an attitude problem.
Russel Norman is an idiot; putting up GST does not make it more expesnive to lower paid people as they will get a tax cut if they have a job and if they are on a benefit they will get an increase.
Wealth Creation
yeah good comments above. While i am not a high income earner i think it is good to have incentives that encourage the creation of wealth. The priority if we are to catch up to Australia ought to be wealth creation, not "equality". Firstly incentivise people to work (get off benefits), and then secondly build up their own and the country's wealth.
Wealth Creation
Yes good comments above. While i am not a high income earner i think it is a good thing to encourage wealth creation. If we are to catch up to Australia, we need to firstly incentivise people to work (tighter restrictions on benefit eligibility), then secondly build up their own wealth and that of the country.
Monkey Puzzle
I wonder where the usual suspect opposition Monkeys were hiding when they for nine long years gouged the NZ taxpayer ,now in a sack cloth and ashes mentality they are coming out of their slumber,LEST WE FORGET ,WHO GOUGED FIVE BILLION DOLLARS OFF POWER USERS,AND WHO BROUGHT IN GST 20 YEARS AGO,you guessed it ,the same pests who are now going through being frugal with the truth.
if you cant afford to rasie
Eh? Woudn't your solution of putting the extra kids in faster care simply be far more expensive that leaving them with the parents, and therefore simply be a waste of the precious tax money you are concerned about? And would it not add to the social cost of delinquency and crime etc from the foster care children when they are older?
Hmm you are aware the top
Hmm you are aware the top tax rate in Australia is 46.5% (including medicare levy) and that we also have a Capital Gains Tax right?
This much more progressive taxation regime doesn't appear to have stopped Australia significantly outperforming New Zealand's economic growth over a substantial period of time. It certainly doesn't stop me from trying to earn another pre-tax dollar whether through my labour or investing.
I think you will find Mr Norman is correct. Cutting the top tax rate and increasing the GST will make NZ's tax system substantially more regressive and therefore lower living standards for lower paid workers. Whether it makes the economy more dynamic and productive is an open question but the evidence from countries with highly regressive tax systems like the U.S. isn't exactly inspiring.
Top Tax Rates
Labour seems to have a very short memory. They raised the top tax rate from 33% to 39% upon becoming the Governemnt in 1999 for absolutely no reason other than "we won, you lost - eat that" as Michael Cullen put it at the time. Labour then proceeded to squander the extra tax revenue on all sorts of poor quality social engineering for the next 9 years, while thousands of taxpayers who didn't think they were rich on $60,000 per year ended up paying 39% as incomes rose and tax bracket creep poured money into Labour's coffers. All National is doing is giving us back our own money, that Labour had no right to and didn't need in the first place.
You guys honestly believe
You guys honestly believe raising GST will bring parity with Aus - It won't! We have a tax free threshold of $6000 per/annum, 19% income tax and 10% GST. NZ has no tax free threshold, 24% tax and soon to be 15% GST. If it were us, Australians, having this proposed to us you would expect to see rioting on the streets. We simply would not take that lying down. You want an economic stimulus, look at what the Rudd Govt did, they gave money to people to keep the economy running. They encouraged people to take on part-time work rather than have high unemployment & focused on international trade. Compare this to NZ which is bleeding the poorest for even more, ruining the 3rd largest market in NZ, tourism with it's mining plans and having ridiculously high unemployment. Kiwi's - for your own sake, please protest!
"Bleeding the poorest for even more"
Your joking aren't you ? The bottom 40% (the poorest) pay NO TAX at all after allowance for Working for Families ete. They only exist because the top 10% of taxpayers pay 76% of the tax take on the same basis. Frankly, when it comes to tax, the poorest have it unquestionably the best !
Post new comment