Member log in

Govt takes controlling stake in Auckland redevelopment project

BUSINESSDESK: The government and Auckland City are jointly investing $8.5 million in a new commercial entity to guide the plans to transform the lower socio-economic suburbs of Glen Innes and Panmure over the next 20 years.

Housing Minister Phil Heatley and Auckland mayor Len Brown have signed a heads of agreement to create the Tamaki Redevelopment Company, in which the government will take a 59% share and Auckland City 41%, contributing $5 million and $3.5 million of establishment capital, respectively.

The company follows a three-year consultation process in which a Tamaki Transformation Plan was created, with delivery of all elements of the vision estimated to cost around $1.9 billion over 20 years, and with potential to create as many as 45,000 jobs over 30 years.

The area involved covers the Glen Innes, Point England and Panmure districts, including the Tamaki campus of the University of Auckland and associated nearby new residential developments.

The plan gained early negative publicity when Housing New Zealand evicted tenants to make way for what the plan described as a "first stage mixed ownership redevelopment", in which old state houses were cleared for a mixture of new state housing and private owners.

The plan envisages the creation of "more mixed communities" to accelerate the economic prospects of the area, which is forecast to grow swiftly in coming years, being close to both the Auckland and Manukau city centres. Population is expected to double by 2046, the plan says.

Today's announcements contained no detail on how the proposed vision would be funded or how private sector capital could be involved.

"The TRC will lead the transformation, undertaking some projects itself, procuring delivery of other projects, and influencing the direction of others," said Mr Heatley, who last year suggested it could be produce New Zealand's first "urban development agency" and a blueprint for other urban redevelopment projects.

Its chief executive will be Debra Lawson. She has been chief executive at Queenstown Lakes District Council, a post she left on June 30, two months shy of her three-year contract.

Before that, she spent 20 years in urban redevelopment initiatives in Britain, particularly south London.

"She has worked at the leading edge of public private partnership initiatives, delivering large-scale and complex urban regeneration programmes within the diverse communities of south London, with a strong focus on accountability to local people," Messrs Heatley and Brown said in their joint statement.

An interim board is expected to be replaced with a combination of government, city council, local and private sector interests.
 

Comments and questions
9

A great move by Minister Phil Heatley and the Government in working collaboratively with the local Council and in the future private sector interests.

This will make these areas a better place to live and give the local residents pride in the area and, hopefully, less crime.

A win-win all round.

I'm glad that the Government will be in place to check Len Brown's Amitai Etzioni style Communitarianism i.e. a synthesis of capitalism and socialism. Local government is the soft vulnerable underbelly for all kinds of international treaty sourced (Agenda 21) interference in sovereign Kiwi affairs such as high density housing, restrictions on where to live, work and play over the next few years and what we can no longer do if we own a rural property.

I note that Jim Diers from Seattle is going to be in NZ in August teaching Asset Based Community Development to Auckland Super City staff and local sustainable neighbourhood groups. He's great at creating fractious communities!

Why is Auckland Council using ratepayers money to get a self-confessed Alinsky-community organiser to teach Council how to set up sock-puppet 'faux' community groups with Auckland Council facilitators leading same to a preordained consensus in 'what needs to be done in our community'. This Delphi technique manufactured consensus stuff is really rearing it's head in Auckland at the moment. One suspects that Penny Hulse's former position at Waitakere Council, where they signed an MOU with ICLEI, is one reason.

Given ABCD is all about high density housing, sock puppet community groups and ultimately an attack on single family neighbourhoods and homes why are we allowing Auckland Council to use our rates to consult with those who are against us.

Good to see a National Government protecting us from the Internationalist enrtyists in local government!

Cheers.

Hamish it takes all types to make this world a better place and the reverse argument to you would be if it was the national government working on its own they would be selling off those suburbs to developers including public land.

So on the converse its good to have Len Brown and his Council keeping the Government honest.

You need to braoden your horizons and life experiences Hamish before your head gets trapped where the sun don't shine.

Hi Doctor - you should lay off the prescription pad and dry out for a while methinks. So you think manufactured consensus and local government sock puppetry is 'honest'? You think using ratepayers money to hire a foreign follower of Saul Alinsky to train council in these techniques is honest?

Pathetic and dishonest more like. You should be ashamed.

"You need to braoden your horizons and life experiences Hamish before your head gets trapped where the sun don't shine".

Classic comment from a Leftist troll that reads minds, insults strangers and makes declarative statements about the life experiences of those he has never met.

Case closed :)

A great move? For Auckland, yes, but not for the taxpayer. Once again Auckland proves itself unable to stand on its own feet when it comes to costs, although I daresay it'll be happy to put out its hand for any benfits.
Once more into the suckers' breach dear taxpayer!!

Couldn't agree more. I'm sick of Auckland getting my taxes because of its social problems.

well sis they not spend LOADS of cash a few years ago updating the GI housing only to move the same "problems" back in a create the same Ghetto mentality and have some of the houses even now look as bad as they did before. Now tell me again why I should spend my rates money on upgrading this yet again?? Think again Council and Govt, these people deserve better than lipstick on a pig efforts.

Auckland has exported tax for years. It's about time govt reinvested it back into the future of the country. Science park in GI or more cows and $ to the south island good ol boys? Not a hard choice.