Member log in

Greens admit housing allowance 'mistake'

The Green Party has admitted claiming above market rent for a house occupied by two of its MPs and says it paid back about $6000 to Parliamentary Services.

The Greens have been critical of other parties keeping expenses secret and called for transparency during the controversy about Finance Minister Bill English's housing allowance.

Mr English last week paid back all the money he had received since becoming a minister, about $32,000, and is no longer claiming any taxpayer money.

Green's co-leader Metiria Turei was questioned about the house rented by MPs Jeanette Fitzsimons and Catherine Delahunty on TV One's Q&A programme today.

Presenter Guyon Espiner said that between February and May this year the two MPs paid $1000 a week in rent, taxpayer money, which was nearly double the market rate.

"We made a mistake, we acknowledged that mistake, we fixed it and we've refunded the money," Ms Turei said.

"About $6000 was refunded...we're quite happy to be open about the process."

However, the Greens didn't disclose their mistake until today under questioning.

"You're quite right to raise it and the public quite rightly has a right to know, which is why we're telling you about it today," Ms Turei said.

More by NZPA

Comments and questions
5

What an indictment of a little clique of nobodies sucking money out of hard working NZs,and when caught it gets dressed up as a" MISTAKE'",I think the Auditor General should look into their financial arrangements a lot closer,especially with the" trusts" they are involved in.

OMG!

This is blatant theift- at least Bill was using legal ways to rot the system.
I suppose all those "green" smokes cloud the old judgement

Suprannuation funds are statutarily obliged to have retirement benefits as their prime purpose.

NOT the taxpayerfunded provision of housing.

Greens caught out as particlarly grubby little maggots.

If their super fund is now providing rentals at less than market prices then the trustees should be investigated for defrauding the other "beneficiaries" and reducing their retirement benefits.

This matter is of criminal proportions. Details need to be released on who exactly made the "mistake" and what the misunderstanding was. All in together to protect oneanother is not good enough. Each MP is responsible for arranging the payment of their own rent.