Member log in

GST removal from healthy food gets a 'no'

A bid to remove GST on healthy foods to lower costs has been slammed by the government.

Prime Minister John Key said the government will not support Maori MP Rahui Katene's bill, which defines healthy food as fruit and vegetables, breads and cereals, milk and milk products – excluding ice cream, cream products, condensed and flavoured milk – and lean meat, poultry, seafood, eggs, nuts, seeds and legumes.

The government would not support the removal of GST on particular items, he said.

"In our view, what makes the system work well is the simplicity and its low administration costs. Once you start exempting one part, meat and vegetables, then why wouldn't (you to) other parts of the food equation."

"We've compensated for GST through personal tax cuts, so we are not going to move on and take GST off food."

The bill says food prices have risen more than 20% in the last three years while real incomes have risen only very slightly.

"While all consumers will benefit from the removal of goods and services tax from healthy food, those on lower incomes spend a greater proportion of their income on food and will receive a significant benefit as a result."

Revenue Minister Peter Dunne said the bill would introduce 'healthy food' definitions that would be difficult to categorise.

"For example, what does lean meat mean, as opposed to non-lean meat," Mr Dunne said.

Mr Dunne said it could open the door to others, demanding to be given the same treatment, and it would mean a loss of millions of tax dollars which would have to be found somewhere else.

Ms Katene mentioned a computerised model introduced in December 2009 by the Australian Taxation Office, making GST food and beverage compliance extremely easy to manage.

Mr Dunne said the IRD had not looked into it, "simply because it is not New Zealand's policy to have a non-universal GST.

"When one looks at the experiences of defining some of these items in the Australian and the British context, one sees that we would be extremely unwise to follow suit," he said.

Ms Katene is appealing for her Goods and Services Tax (Exemption of Healthy Food) Amendment Bill to be at least put through its first reading so it can go to a select committee for public submissions.

Labour Party leader Phil Goff said his party would support the bill to a select committee.

"We believe that there is a case to be argued for taking the GST (off) for healthy food like fresh fruit and vegetables that would be both good for nutrition in a nation that's becoming increasingly obese," he said.

Mr Key said passing the first reading would give New Zealanders the false impression "that somehow we are prepared to move in this area, when we are not".

But Ms Katene said she would try again if needed.

"This is too important. This is really a matter of life and death. Eleven thousand people are dying from eating relating diseases, we really need to be doing something about that," she said.

The bill is likely to go on Parliament's agenda for a first reading debate in two weeks.

More by NZPA and NBR staff

More on:

Comments and questions
7

It took the Australians three years and many international culinary and taxation specialists criss-crossing the airspace for the courts to determine whether an imported Italian product was 'bread' - which did not attract GST - or a 'cracker' - which did.

Hair-splitting on GST at this level is just plain crackers. Save the court costs and put the money into a 'fruit in schools' programme or something similar instead.

Too much of any good (cheap) thing is bad for you. Making bread 'cheaper than chips' might encourage over-much carbohydrate consumption that is equally costly in obesity-related health terms as too much fat from the fries. Furthermore, what will the family savings from the food bill be spent on in some households? More alcohol, perhaps?

Agreed.

Begs to question, why haven't they looked at this from an easier-to-police method like tax concessions for the producer? same result in effect - cheaper shelf price.

Much easier to police. Clearly defined. Direct with no room for ambiguity. And much easier than zero rating certain products on a supplier's invoice!

The question is - what is healthier?

Why subisidise a breadmaker when the refined carbohydrates, starches, salt & sugar can be as damaging as anything else?

Maybe just on fruit & veg?

I cannot see why it is not implemented on at least a partial basis. Fruit and vegetables, for instance, and it should not be beyond parliament to come up with a list of the requirements for meeting any exemption. Anything would be better than nothing, and why not GST exemption on meat too, such as mince, lamb, chicken breast, fresh fish? It could be a nice boost to some industries that are crucial to our economy (even if much of their profit is from exporting).

It beggars belief that lobby groups want GST free healthy foods. What we want is bureaucrats out of our lives, keep it (the tax system) simple stupid.

If GST was removed from healthy food PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Russell McVeigh, and the like will setup entire divisons to advise businesses how to label products as healthy, then their competitors will setup entire business units advising the IRD how to counter the "healthy" but very unhealthy loss of GST.

A Royal Commission will be formed with 3 Judges who have vested interests in food production to preside over the pontifications, and at the same time......

Obesity will continue to rise, people who spend most of their income on cigarettes, and booze will still have malnourished children whose main purpose in life was to get a pay rise for their parents via welfare wealth transfer system.

rant over.

Want healthy food for many, ban the use of incorrect fats and oils at the 1000s of fish and chip shops and other takeaways. Ban use of sugar in soft drinks.

Supermarkets in NZ sell at the highest price they can get away with, if we remove GST, prices will soon move up again anyway

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>