Member log in

Hanover investors to forego interest in five-year deal

The Hanover Finance group has unveiled its long-awaited restructure plan, under which it plans to repay secured investors all their principal in the next five years and continue as a property lending business.

Hanover Finance shareholders Mark Hotchin and Eric Watson are also putting $96 million into the company: $10 million cash straight away with another $20 million to call on in future years; and $66 million of property equity.

The complicated plan addresses four types of investors.

Hanover Finance and United Finance debenture-holders, owed $462.5 million and $64.7 million respectively, are expected to get all of their principal back, with payments quarterly until the end of 2013.

Most of the money – 70% – won't come until 2012 and 2013.

Hanover Finance subordinated note holders (owed $2.1 million) and Hanover Capital bondholders (owed $24.2 million) will get a one-off payment of 50% of their investment at the end of 2013, assuming all the other payments to Hanover Finance and United Finance debenture holders have been met.

There is a mechanism by which secured investors can receive interest payments too, but this will only happen once the shareholders’ support has been repaid.

Hanover chairman Greg Muir, who announced today that he is stepping down from his board post next year to take on a full time executive position, says there was a chance Hanover could have made it through until the government’s deposit guarantee was introduced, and then been eligible for it.

But, he says, the company decided to enter a moratorium early to preserve cash and make sure it had the means to design an appropriate restructure plan.

All of the Hanover senior figures in attendance at the media conference emphasised the plan’s advantages over a receivership, with Mr Muir saying that appointing a receiver would double Hanover’s operating costs, and Mr Hotchin saying it would be a “disaster”.

Independent advisers PricewaterhouseCoopers and KordaMentha agreed that the debt restructure plan was more advantageous at this time than receivership, principally because the shareholder support would not be available if the plan is not approved by investors.

The $10 million in upfront cash is to be held in an escrow account and used for principal repayments if required.

Messrs Hotchin and Watson have also chipped in $26 million to enable Hanover to purchase a loan from another company that they control, to the Matarangi Beach Estates development.

Hanover Finance chief executive Peter Fredricson, who has taken the reins after previous CEO Bruce Gordon left for a post at PGG Wrightson, says this will increase Hanover’s equity in the project.

Matarangi is part of the $40 million in property assets owned by Axis Property Group, which are also being transferred from Hanover’s shareholders to Hanover.

Those assets also include land holdings at the Clearwater Resort in Christchurch, apartments at the Sebel hotel in Auckland and sections at the Jacks Point and Henley Downs developments in Queenstown.

Mr Muir says in the context of other finance company restructure plans involving additional contributions from shareholders, Messrs Hotchin and Watson’s was the “most generous and most tangible.”

Hanover is looking to make new loans, although a strict list of conditions have been imposed to make sure these are low risk.

Mr Hotchin says the success of this new lending could affect Hanover’s planned return to investors by 10%.

Beyond the expected repayment of investors in 2013, Hanover expects to trade on as a mezzanine financier, although not with debenture funding.

More by by Sarah McDonald

Comments and questions
24

You are obviously someone with no brain...you clearly don't understand the time value of cash. Or you are Watson himself trying to trick readers. Taking the money now is better because either way is the same payment...well, taking the money now is probably a bit better. This is even though it 'looks' like taking the future payment is better. However, it is not better. Do not be fooled by the numbers! Put the rich lister in the bucket because he is only going to come back and do this again in the future! Watson lent most of the money to himself anyway. There is only one way to punish him. LIQUIDATE LIQUIDATE LIQUIDATE

It is indeed very generous of Watson and Hotchin to contribute such as large proportion of the $40m+ dividend they recently recieved from Hanover.

I suspect there is very little true equity associated with the property assets that the shareholders are so kindly contributing. Will hanover end up servicing existing debt associated with these assets? There is not exactly a rush of buyers for unsaleable development land and downtown appartments just now.

I think Hanover Finance should pay interest on our outstanding investments. I don't think that they should freeze our investments without giving us a proper return. I could have ended my term investment on 6 June 2008 but was told that the company was doing very well and they increased the interest rate then one month later they were in trouble surely someone shoud have known what was going on

I note that Hanover is expected to continue after 2013. As borrowers are expected to pay interest why are investors not being paid interest or being offered shares in the company. Looks like a free ride for Watson. Need to see all the details but on the face of it receivership might be best. Can anyone trust these guys ?

no, dnt trust them..receivership all the way!

they have to be joking ,
what are the property values at this moment,talk about speculation!! with other peoples money!,where is the 40 mil they took in dividends, how do these guys look at themselves in the mirrow

When you count in the compounded forgone interest over five years, Watson is only returning about 60 cents in the dollar in today's dollar terms. It would therefore be just as good to go into receivership and get 50 cents in the dollar right now. This is a scandal!

However, if you assumed a finance company investment rate of 10%, which is what you might have been able to get elsewhere, then the compounded forgone interest well exceeds 50%. I hate the way the rich guys can't actually make a good deal for people, instead trying to trick them with the numbers.

For every hundred companies that seek a debtors comprise, 100 promise better returns than receivership or liquadition and 99 fail to deliver.
Give me 50 cents anyday and as for future funding, yeah right!

I think it stinks that those two can think we would settle for return of monies owed in 2013, Hey I don t have that long to wait. They should do the right thing, pay off their debts, and then start again if they have any money left over. We are just being ripped off

So there you have it, either way you get the same amount of real cash in hand...but only one way you also get to see the rich-lister burn...receivership. Others will be able to rise up and take his place, it won't be a blow to NZ. Off with his head!!

40 % now or 100% + in five. A no brainer decision.

Well my NO vote is already in the post. Its just a discrace that they actually intent to keep the business using interest free money from existing investors.

why would you trust hanover board now

vote no ,the roadshow is a slick presentation ,to convince u to say yes , no no no

i am anothr mug who believed hanover ,were sound ,now what a joke ,to expect investors to wait five years to get back the capitol,i rather see them in jail 5 years and receivers appioined

Looks like the property they are kicking in is loaded with debt that will need to be covered before any return to investors (talk about toxic assets). For sure Watson & Co have structured the whole thing to benefit themselves and not us. I'd rather trust the receiver. I'm voting no.

What about the HCL investors who were told the company was 100% backed by HFL and will recieve nothing if they go to receiveship.Which way do i vote ?

Its about time the NZ government took some responsibilty for allowing all these fiance companies to mislead so many hard working savers, all the assets of all these companies and all the assets of the directors of these companies should be taken into statutory management by a government body set up to sort out this mess, and it should be done immediately. Jane Diplock? have you no gumption whatsoever?

It's time for the buck to stop at its true destination - Watson and Hoskin. While they continue to party hard on Pacific Island with friends and own multi million dollar properties on Waiheke Island and elsewhere, those who paid for it all and who trusted their word are now struggling for survival. What a slap in the face.

Come on NZ Govt it's about time that there was a level of accountability applied in order that their gross incompetence is punished and not rewarded.

Hi Messieurs Hotchin & Watson,

No more promises and fine talk but deeds we want.
Give us our money back before we are put down six ft. under and the undertaker comes and knocks on our door.Our investments matured already on 3-7-2008 &
19-12-2008.
The next one No.65604 matures on 27-4-2009.

Investors Louis & Ina Boeijen

well they say what u reap u sow ,i hope i live long enough to we these to lowlifes ,receive some devine justice ,as nz authorities cant do much under the existing laws .u know ned kelly was more honest .these two care not one jot about the misry they have caused ,as long as their lifestyle is not changed ,they make me sick .i voted for receivership

I THINK YOU ARE THE NO BRAINER. WANKER

The minute trouble hits Mr Gordon scoots like a racehorse on 'roids' to another company. These guys have NO trouble looking at themselves in the mirror because they just don't care about the little guy and the people they squash getting to were they are as liquid-lunching money piglets!

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>