Member log in

Housing shortage Pt I: Crisis? What crisis?

Horror stories of promising property developments falling over have been hitting news headlines, along with gloomy figures that show construction of new homes and sales of existing homes have dropped. Meanwhile, the population is at 4.3 million and rising.

While National’s promised changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) should improve consent processes and costs, delays have been driving developers up the wall and holding up subdivisions in recent years.

Buyers are still scarce, but the price of bare land seems to be balancing back to mid-2007 levels according to figures from the Real Estate Institute.

In July 2007, the median average price of a residential section was $180,000, with 709 sections selling that month.

In February 2009, section prices were back to $180,000 after having skittered from a high median of $200,000 to a low of $165,000 and back again in the months in between.

However, only 316 sections totalling $72.67 million of sections were sold last month, compared with $134 million (530 sections) in February 2008.

Some of the statistics are grim:

- Building consents issued are at the lowest level seen since 1965;
- In the year to January 2009, the value of residential consents fell 23% to $6.02 billion.
- Between September 2007 and March 2009, construction of new residential homes fell 32.5%.
- The value of residential building work fell by 14.2% during 2008.

However, positive signs are appearing in the market.

For example the number of buyers for residential property are picking up.

The number of homes sold nationwide in February 2009 was 5,228, compared to the slump of 4220 in August 2008 and the high figures of 6394 in August 2007.

The question is whether the industry can recover quickly enough for supply to meet demand.

According to New Zealand Property Investors Federation president Martin Evans, it is too late to prevent a housing shortage crisis.

“We need approx 20,000 new houses to be built each year to house the population –currently there are only about 7000. This has led to the much of the building industry sustaining irreparable damage including the workforce leaving the industry,” Mr Evans says.

Several major developments across our largest city have been halted for funding difficulties in the last six months, diminishing the number of houses expected to be built during the current period before funding dried up.

Construction of McConnell Property’s significant Auckland asset 450-home McLennan development at Papakura, including 145 residences dedicated to Housing NZ, has been delayed while funding talks continue.

McConnell managing director Martin Udale says there is a dwelling shortage in New Zealand for everything from flats and apartments to farm terraced houses.

"Fundamentally, we are building fewer houses than we need.”

Consent has just been approved for the first 1100 homes of the 3000-house Hobsonville development, to the displeasure of local residents used to a rural lifestyle.

In the Auckland CBD, Bayleys Research says 1230 apartments are due to be built by 2013 to add to the existing 17,537 inner-city apartments.

But while some residential construction is still continuing, it’s not enough. 

Fermah Group property developers and investors principal Dave Fermah says that the post-millenium 25,000 consents a year housing boom may be an anomaly and that the 1990s figures of 18,000 a year may be more realistic to base future business on. Immigration inflation will also affect the figure.

“Currently 15,000 houses per annum are being consented so that would lead us to believe currently we are 5000 short, or around 20%,” Mr Fermah says. “The other issue that will arise is lack of development funding for speculative development. That will be far harder to arrange in the future.”

Property Council chief executive Connal Townsend wouldn’t call the housing shortfall a "crisis" yet but says, “There definitely appears to be a lack of confidence in the residential property sector, which is flowing through to the declining number of consents for new residential dwellings.”

ANZ National bank chief economist Cameron Bagrie says, “People seem to be seriously under-estimating the scale of challenges at present.”

“It is true that signs of a housing shortage are opening up when it comes to the stock of housing when you are looking at a one-year snapshot,” Mr Bagrie says. “But the picture is not that clear when you are looking at the stock of housing over a number of years relative to supply – just look at the holiday home market for instance.”

Mr Bagrie says that there is there is also no shortage of land in New Zealand. “Hence, correction will pan out.”

Mr Evans agrees that the market will self correct. “But, it could take a long time without intervention.”

Part Two Tomorrow: Will high-density housing hurt New Zealand heritage?

More by Jazial Crossley

Comments and questions
11

Well if land supply for residential housing was not restrained, new sections would be going for around $40k, leaving investors and home owners with funds to actually build a nice, affordable house.

This is a property rights issue: land owners are not allowed to do what they want with their land, they have to ask govt permission, which permission is unreasonably withheld.

However most of NZ seems quite fine with land use fascism, even though they profess the benefits of free markets elsewhere. Until people stop being land use fascists we'll continue to have these problems.

If we keep the population static, then there will be no problem- stop letting people in, we have no where for them to live!!!!!! oh and no jobs!! that's if we get the lazy buggers off benefits all over the place

If there is a shortage of houses, why are prices falling and rents stagnant?

Peter, a good point. Buyers believe better prices (value) will be achieved if they wait. So they wait.

Sellers that have to sell rather than become an accidental landlord set the market value today, and buyers only buy if they have to.

The alternative is rent, and why not. The landlord has to pay for any repairs, the landlord has to meet the market as far as weekly rental goes, and is far more likely to bring rents down to meet the market because his lender won't stop charging interest just because there is no tenant. 1 month loss of rent is 8.33% loss of income.

Eventually some balance will return, but so long as the buyers expect future prices to be lower than today's cost plus inflation minus any value attributed to reduced future land prices the price achieved for houses will drop.

Underlying all this is Investor concerns that the National Govt will take steps to make the investing playing field level. Read undo the LAQC legislation, tighten up or remove depreciation as a cost, encourage other investment/savings strategies, the thought that the Reserve Bank will raise OCR as soon as the economy starts to pick up, and note that some banks are already increasing mortgage rates for longer term loans.

It may be Mr Hillary, that I purchase the residential property next to yours, and one day set up my very own boutique pig-slaughtering factory. Let's say 300 pigs slaughtered each day, right next to your bbq area, just to teach you a lesson about the importance of planning controls. No more land use fascism!!

Everyone knows about economic cycles: booms are followed by recessions in the same way as day is followed by night. The global economy has experienced a huge boom in housing following the stock market crash of 2001, with many investors prefering property to stocks because property prices "never fall". Now we are in a property recession that has become a global recession, so expect investors to shunt property and expect a slow recovery from the worst recession in decades. Is there a shortage? That's a relative question in a capitalist economy, where demand is market driven, and only a portion of residential property is inelastic (main residences) and therefore directly affected by population increases. So yes, there may be a shortage in main residential accommodation in the next 2-3 years, but a surplus in other types of residential property. In the end market forces dictate that new houses will be built when these can be sold at a profit.

I agree that land is ridiculously expensive here in NZ and that government (local & higher) strangles supply. Less than 1% of NZ is urbanised, in Canada you cant get land to build on for $5k to $20k easy. Then spend your $200k on building a big beautiful house.

Hi,

You're showing your own ignorance there. The common law has remedies for nuisance available to anyone who suffers from this tort, and injuctions are also available to prevent planned activities that will cause nuisance. However, when a new residential subdivision is made, why wouldn't the developer include covenants in the land titles to protect against any undesired activities, even if they are not within the definition of 'nuisance'?

Also you're off topic and your objection is for this reason irrelevant: this is about converting land around the urban/suburban periphery into new residental lots, not about industrial use next to residential use. It is precicely restrictions on this land use conversion that is jacking up residential lots to $150-200K when they would be under $50k without such restrictions.

David Hillary hits the nail on the head - where are the $40,000 lots on the fringes where people actually want to live? And by extension - the #140,000 - $160,000 starter homes there for young people.

May I suggest Jaasail Crosseley check out the comparative situations of the States of Victoria and Queensland - and compare section prices / construction performance of both States.

Better still - find out as well wthe pricing of fringe starter housing on the fringes of the affordable North American markets.

The evidence is staring us in the face.

Hugh Pavletich
Performance Urban Plannng
www.PerformanceUrbanPlanning.org
Co author - Annual Demographia Surveys

Yes! We need cheaper sections. But we also need good planning for our city. But who says we need to restrict the land supply in order to satify the town planner's vision? Auckland is not a big city at all compare to cities overseas. And our town planners who put in those restrictions are right that urban sprawl with out control will decrease amenity. So what do we do? Nothing? We just hope the city to stop growing? That is wrong! We need better infrastructure so we can expand metropolitan limits with world-class town planning. So dear local governments, its time get off your bums and actually do some work on the infrastructure.

I agree with your sentiment David. Land is vastly overpriced in this country. And what results in the delays and lack of planning over land for housing is a rush to bring sections to the market when prices are peaking, with developers going broke the moment the market turns. We have all seen the boom and bust cycles in our building industry and when the market picks up again there will be skill shortages and prices will climb again. While we didnt kill our economy with sub prime morgages, we havent learnt much from the bust of the mid 70s, or the 1990 era. There seems to be a complete lack of vision with this key ingrediant to our economy.

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>