Member log in

How Paul Reynolds' pay stacks up against the competition

If you're a shareholder (or toey linesman) who sucked air through your teeth when you heard Telecom chief executive was the "$5 million man," his full compensation may start you grinding your molars.

For FY09 (the 12 months to June 30), Mr Reynolds earned:
• $1.75 million in base salary;
• $3.06 million through a performance incentive scheme; the maximum possible (60% in cash, 40% in restricted shares, payable this August);
• $243,950 in “special costs”, including costs for relocating from the UK; and
• $2.1 million through a performance rights scheme (paid in the form of 668,790 Telecom shares, which will vest over the next three years).

All up, Dr Reynolds made a shade over $7 million (although that amount could ultimately be more, or less, depending on Telecom’s performance on the NZX over the next three years, given the parcel of 668,790 shares under the rights scheme component).

Dr Reynolds’ compensation eclipses Telecom’s previous record, held by his predecessor Theresa Gattung with $5.4 million (including a $1.8 million exit package).

(Read Telecom's defence of its chief executive's compensation in "The bargain $5 million".)

Telecom recently reported a 43.9% in annual net profit after tax to $398 million on revenue that fell 2% to 2% to $5.587 billion.

Excluding one-of items, the result was in line with analysts’ expectations - although those expectations were informed, in part, by Telecom’s investor day briefing in Sydney on May 28.

The company is predicting another profit dip this year ahead of a pick-up in FY11.

Over at Fonterra, which has revenue four times that of Telecom, the co-operative’s annual reported listed its highest paid employee – presumably chief executive Andrew Ferrier – as earning a total of $3.98 million last year. Like Telecom, Fonterra has instituted a pay freeze.

Mr Ferrier has said he expects to take a pay cut this year, given the performance-related elements of this compensation.

Air New Zealand chief executive Rob Fyfe earned $1.2 million for the 2009 financial year in base salary, plus a $1.24 million bous.

Contact Energy made headlines when it briefly passed Telecom in market capitalisation on the NZX earlier this year. Its chief executive, David Baldwin, received a total of $1.5 million last year in salary and incentives. Contact recently announced that its annual profit had halved to $117 million on revenue that rose 19% to $2.2 billion.

Telecom’s executives and division heads also compare well in their own right to chief executives elsewhere in corporate New Zealand.

Sky TV’s FY08 annual report lists chief executive John Fellet’s total salary and bonuses as $1.1 million, for example. The pay TV provider recently reported FY09 revenue up 5% to $691.9 million from $658.8 million and a gross profit before tax of $125.8 million, down 12.7% on the previous year.

Compare that to Telecom’s top earners for FY09 (The table below is abbreviated. All bar Frank Mount also earned long term incentive payments of at least $243,000. UK ex-pat Russ Houlden also received $281,273 in travel and relocation payments; US ex-pat Frank Mount $97,742 and Alan Gourdie, who returned to NZ from the UK $41,785).

Neither TelstraClear nor Vodafone NZ list their chief executive’s salary in their companies office filings. Vodafone NZ chief executive Russell Stanners (who oversaw a $191.5 million net profit after tax on revenue of $1.5 billion in FY08) declined to detail any terms of his contract but said he indicated he was paid a lot less than $5 million.

Mr Stanners also said his executive team was paid a lot less than Telecom’s. Vodafone NZ’s FY08 filing does show that the company paid out $5 million in share options, spread across an un-named number of employees.

Across the Tasman, Optus chief executive Paul O’Sullivan looks a bargain for shareholders, presiding over an $A8 billion turnover company (Telecom’s market cap is around $5 billion), but earning just $A2.7 million.

Ahead of the Vodafone Australia-Hutchison merger, which created a combined mobile operation with annual revenue of around $A4 billion, Hutchison chief executive Nigel Dews earned total annual compensation of $A1.3 million .

On August 12, Hutchison (which was 10% owned by Telecom, whose stake was converted into a 5% holding in the merged company trading as Vodafone Australia) reported revenue up 19% to $A912 million for the first half, and net profit after tax of $A552 million, mostly fuelled by the one-off sale of its "3" mobile business ahead of theVodafone merger, which was completed June 9.

And Telstra’s new chief executive, ex-pat Kiwi David Thodey, has started on a $A2 million base salary, with potential total compensation of $A9.2 million in his first year if he hits all his bonus targets. Telstra recently reported a net profit after tax that rose 10.4% to $A4 billion on revenue of $A25.5 billion.

More by Chris Keall

Comments and questions
20

The amounts paid to (you couldn't say "earned by") Telecom management are obscene, going back to the Deane/Gatung days when the dimwitted Board paid the former CEO (who created or did nothing to fix this mess) millions on her long-overdue exit. The Board should be replaced. They have no judgement and are a bunch of idiots - nothing personifies the inbred uselessness of the NZ corporate scene better than this bunch of hopeless lackeys and placemen none of whom have a clue about the telecommunications business. Paul Reynolds has played them expertly - gets a huge package then manages expectations downwards so adroitly that poor performance is interpreted as success and its big bonuses all round. He is also smart enough to get his managers' snouts in the trough too thereby ensuring their loyalty. He must be laughing all the way to the bank as its loads more than BT would ever have paid him and he has got the board eating out of his hand. He plays them even better than Theresa did.

This guy Reynolds is out thier in the cold rain connecting broken fiber optic lines inside water fill cable holes by the road. Ops! thats not him is it.

The tax man will be happy TWO -THREE MILLION DOLLAR TAKE?

...drop of 40% in profit?

$7 mill per annum is sick no matter how you look at it.

Anon..dont worry, LAQC your tax away

Whats it like to fly to Sydney first class just for a coffee?Oh and back home again that night!!!!

Good on Paul for negotiating this sort of package. The board is to blame for any targets that may seem soft.
For the record i dont care what he is paid as long as targets are met. Again these are set by the board and negotiated by Paul.....

Clearly Mr Reynolds is better at negotiating contracts than the Telecom Board is, if he gets a 100% performance bonus when profit halves. Maybe the Telecom shareholders need to think about replacing the Board.

Obviously the board does not believe the lines staff have these seeing as how they are slashing pay and conditions there (maybe to afford the CEO's salary?).

None of these people EARN that much; they just get paid that much.

Grotesque & indefensible by any rational yardstick

How can anyone claim quarter of a million dollars relocation costs. What did he do - move the whole house?

I reckon Paul is doing okay. Maybe not a job worth $5mil, but telecom has achieved a bunch of stuff this year. Gen-i and retail have done very well in a poor economic climate. Other companies are down on profit this year with the whole economic slump (or whatever it is).
the only thing at telecom that needs serious attention now is sorting out the Chorus guys to make them happy and maybe fixing HR, which has become the most retaded bunch if idiots you could ever encouter.

So what is it about the Telecom board.Name them please and tell us what experience and qualifications they have. Does Wayne Boyd know anything about telecommunications????????

There needs to be major changes to this and other major NZX listed companies. They are generally old boys clubs, who are past it sitting on gravy trains

I don't really read NBR much anymore, I think you have gone down the wrong path by initiating subscriber content.
I tend to go to other sources now.
I would ammend this NBR

Hat tip to Reynolds for negotiating the package which in my view, only serves to underscore the commercial incompetence of the Board.

This just shows you were Telecom puts all its money, definitely not into are telecommunications infrastructure.

Hey the guy did okay and he has been there 2+ years....beats the Theresa who drove the company down and did nothing but get it a bad rep.

If he earns 5mill...good for him! I still say he did okay for the company.

The Board of Telecom is paying Paul Reynolds as much as they can, because the more they pay him, the more they can pay themselves.The recent two major collapses of the XT network show that Reynolds and other top executives are incompetent, and should be sacked, and of course the Board for choosing an incompetent CEO should also go. A new Board should be required to call for tenders for the top positions, and there is nothing more certain than that a new CEO could be employed for a fractiion of $7 million. Then Board salaries would have to be commensurately lower than now.

yeah i dont know why they are paying that much to only one person.they should use that money for other welfare purposes for the country.if mr.paul gets paid $5m and also given around 2k for travel and accomodation to fly to britain then compared to normal person who only earns 40thousand a year after working 45 hrs a week!!!!!!what a big difference.maybe paul is doing worth it!!!!!!!!

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>