Is Rebstock's replacement a fox in the hen house?
Simon Power’s recommendation that Dr Mark Berry take over from Paula Rebstock as chairman of the Commerce Commission shows the government is ready to consider radical change to the competition landscape.
The commerce minister recommended Dr Berry for the role yesterday after Ms Rebstock announced she was stepping down, ending 11 years at the commission, nearly five and a half as chairwoman.
Dr Berry – a barrister and a specialist in competition law and economic regulation – was deputy chairman of the Commerce Commission between 1999 and 2001.
More significantly, however, Dr Berry has more recently been a consultant at Chapman Tripp, the law firm that has been a leading lobbyist for radical reform of the Commerce Commission.
A couple of weeks ago Mr Power hinted at changes to the commission's mandate, saying he was "casting a fresh eye" on the commission.
This came on the back of a report by competition lawyer Grant David of Chapman Tripp, calling for change (NBR print, Feb 5, 2009).
Chapman Tripp claims, among other things, that current competition law is a luxury that New Zealand can no longer afford, and that the commission's "overly interventionist approach" has increased costs of private enterprise at a time when they can least afford it.
Todd Energy's Richard Tweedie also questioned the role of the Commerce Commission, calling for the new government to closely review the regulator's priorities (NBR print, Feb 13).
The National government, it seems, is open to ideas.
Prime Minister John Key is understood to have said openly to market participants that the corporate landscape, in terms of competition, needs adjusting.
Mr Power says the commission was fortunate to have someone as experienced as Dr Berry immediately available for the position as the commission undertakes new regulatory responsibilities following the passing of the Commerce Amendment Act late last year.
"Given that Ms Rebstock's warrant expires at the end of this month, we had to move quickly to ensure a new chair is appointed to ensure the Commission has the stability it needs, and we are fortunate Mr Berry was available at such short notice."
Mr Berry is a specialist in the area of competition law and economic regulation, and has acted in several leading merger and restrictive trade practice cases since the enactment of the Commerce Act.
"He brings valuable experience to the commission’s future work, both in relation to trade practices and in the area of regulation of natural monopolies," Mr Power says.
Update: This story has been updated to clarify Todd Energy managing director Richard Tweedie's statements, which did not question the need for the Commerce Commission, but rather it's priorities.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit
















Comments and questions9
Hopefully we will now see some common sense regulation that allows the good operators to flourish whilst severly punishing the bad operators. Not as we have seen in the past good operators being bogged down whilst the bad one escape any punishment
Bye Bye lady you forgot to measure apples with apples,most of your decisions would have looked good in NORTH KOREA.
"Prime Minister John Key is understood to have said openly to market participants that the corporate landscape, in terms of competition, needs adjusting."
What is that supposed to mean?
Sources in the know had it CCH expected to be hit for $1.5 bln. She dithered those couple of crucial days and lopped it to $900K, so she could get the balance for the ripped-off consumers. (grading this time, not for the "pass-it-past-a-pizza-oven" timber that Messrs Cushing, Liddell, Whineray etc thought was adequate for NZ rainy/leaky conditions -- which a Mr Cavanaugh had told them was identical to Aus.) No, this was just for basic, old-fashioned fraud.
What did we get out of it? Squat, minus paying CCH's costs.
"The Lads" probably bathed in the stuff the other night.
As Com Com notes: Let's get a new cop who hammers the crooks (however "respectable" they might pretend to be), and leaves the rest alone -- until they trun bad. Bad should be in Berry's sights; not clever.
That was a very quick appointment!! So much for a transparent process. Danger of looking like picking your mates when it's done like that... Bad form. Com Com already looking tardy re previous lapses in board appointment process.
The chickens will be laughing over this appointment.
Of course we know in the new appointment for COMCOM the rabbits are in charge of the lettuce.
"we are fortunate Mr Berry was available at such short notice."
So you're asking this old chook to accept Mr Berry's sudden availability as mere good luck - and that Ms Rebstock wasn't nudged from the chair by the same invisible hand that so smoothly puts him in it?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes, Mr Power?
It is nearly impossible to find any suitable candidates for the commerce commission who have not worked in some way, shape or form for the lobbying industry. Why not then look at Dr. Berry's experience as an outsider as a positive?
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below