Joyce scraps $340 millon broadband investment fund
Communications and Information Technology Minister Steven Joyce has made his first major decision, moving to scrap the Labour-led government’s $340 million Broadband Investment Fund (BIF).
BIF gets the hiff
Labour set up the five-year BIF programme as a scheme to experiment with different wired and wireless broadband technologies, with a focus on the regions.
Mr Joyce, who suspended the BIF at the time of the election, says the fund will now not proceed.
A number of local government authorities and alternative broadband technology companies such as Kordia had proposals in front of the BIF, which had 19 full applications awaiting approval, and 156 expressions of interest.
Instead, his government will now focus on its six-year, $1.5 billion plan to bring “ultrafast broadband” to 75% of New Zealanders.
"A lot of organisations spent a lot of money on BIF applications," says Tuanz chief executive Ernie Newman.
However, the government could not be persuaded to keep the fund.
“The BIF was not compatible with the Government’s roll out of ultra fast broadband to the premises - it had its own specific set of criteria and was not focussed on our key objective of achieving widespread ultra fast broadband,” says Mr Joyce.
Mr Newman says he’s sad to see BIF getting the biffed, “there’s been an air of inevitability about the decision” since the election.
However, Mr Newman hopes part of BIF’s spirit will live on. “There’s a great deal of intellectual capital in those [BIF] applications. I hope the momentum and alliances and IP that arose out of the process is not lost."
Mr Newman points to the way BIF brought new broadband players such as power line companies into the market, plus new investors such as regional development authorities and pension funds.
“The type of traditional telco we’ve seen in the market in the past 20 years not necessarily the best for the next generation of investment,” says Mr Newman.
The Tuanz executive's sentiment is echoed by InternetNZ, which has been promoting an independent report that asserts power line companies could complete a national broadband network for $2 billion less than the $5 billion it would cost if constructed by Telecom – the most obvious private partner to top up the $1.5 billion in tax payer funds earmarked for the fibre-to-the-home project.
DDC decapitated
Stating that he’s “clearing the decks”, Mr Joyce has also moved to withdraw funding for Digital Development Council and Forum (DDC) will be withdrawn immediately.
Labour set up the DCC with $825,000 in funding
Mr Joyce says the umbrella group has been axed “because it is our intention to work instead directly through the relevant industry groups.”
Mr Newman – whose Tuanz formed part of the DCC – says the body’s “decapitation” was again expected, but frustrating.
“On the one hand been a good conduit to get dialogue going between like-minded organisations. But on the other it got no runs on the board,” says Mr Newman.
Mr Joyce says he will be announcing the next steps towards the roll out of ultra fast broadband in the near future, following discussions with the industry and cabinet.
The minister will be hoping for a smoother tender process for New Zealand’s mooted national broadband network than the dog’s breakfast request-for-tender process that is still ongoing across the Tasman for the Rudd government’s $A4.6 billion national broadband network.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit
















Comments and questions10
Joyce says “because it is our intention to work instead directly through the relevant industry groups,” I presume 'relevance' correlates with size of donation?
No "relevance" does not equate with "donations".
Don't be so cynical.
According to Wikipedia:
"Relevance is a term used to describe how pertinent, connected, or applicable something is to a given matter. A thing is relevant if it serves as a means to a given purpose".
In this case, as an informed taxpayer, I would presume relevance to mean that the industry groups (comprised of businesses in competition with each other) are more connected with, and have more at stake with, broadband issues and their customers than a group of bureaucrats and their appointed committee members.
who took the f out of fasscism.[sic]
The fact that Mr Joyce said the umbrella group has been axed “because it is our intention to work instead directly through the relevant industry groups” shows that the government is listening and not ignoring them.
It seems pretty clear Joyce is 'marking his patch' replacing one system with another very similar. The rhetoric like 'ultra-fast broadband' and 'work directly' both of which are pretty meaningless.
This is a arrogant waste of time and money, not only for the NZ government which has already spent a good deal of the money Labour had earmarked for BIF and DDC, but also for the businesses who applied to BIF.
It's annoying that the government will be focusing on such high-paid technology. Once again we are faced with National thinking about business and not the little man - prices will only stay at their current level, with more expensive options being set up. How is the average Kiwi business supposed to pay for a super-fast service it can't afford?
Lot of money and energy put to Labour BB strategy & KAREN has not served the provinces. Too hard to convert to reality. Common central strategy for all key govt and educational entities required. Vendor independence required.
Mobility and therefore wireless technology should be the imperative. We can deliver speed to an ever expanding range of mobility devices from throw away $400 portable computers to mobile phones. Putting fibre to every business and home is worthwhile, but who is to say that the maintenance and fact it could be superceded in some distant future anyway justifies the cost. Fibre to the wifi or cellular node will be preferred.
It seems more as though he has decided to stop studying and analysing with taxpayer money in favour of rolling out something that is common to every household in most other developed nations. Makes sense to me.
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to describe at this page www.theinvestblog.com an interesting
type of making money. Can you imagine a person
can earn up to 3% a daily through investments without limitations in without sum limits?
I. e. that even having US$1.000,00 one can earn the same money in a monthly!
If someone is interested welcome to visit my web site www.theinvestblog.com.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below