Member log in

Key not ruling out entrenching Maori seats

National leader John Key told supporters in Upper Hutt today the public had to choose whether they wanted a National, United Future, Act Government or not -- but he did not mention the Maori Party.

In a strongly worded speech Mr Key's tone was tough and he went on the attack against Prime Minister Helen Clark and her Government.

"Do they (New Zealanders) want to wake up on the ninth of November with a Labour-Greens-Progressives-New Zealand First government or do they want to wake up to a National-United-Act government?"

He railed against state interference in private lives.

"I've had nine years of being told what lightbulb I can screw into the house, what shower I can take, what food I can eat, what things I can do, what thoughts I am allowed to have.

"I don't need another three years of Helen Clark telling me what to do. I don't need another three years of Jeanette Fitzsimons telling me what to do, I don't need another three years of Winston Peters telling me he needs a God damn helicopter."

Mr Key received a warm reception to the tub thumping speech from the about 200 people gathered in Upper Hutt College's hall, but it raised questions about Maori Party involvement after the election.

United Future and ACT have both locked in support for a National led Government. Mr Key met ACT leader Rodney Hide publicly yesterday to show their relationship -- last election National leader Don Brash avoided Mr Hide as he met United Future for a tea to show demonstrate their connection.

Mr Key said the Maori Party could support either Labour or National and he would be happy to work with it.

Labour last week said it did not have a problem with entrenching the Maori seats and Miss Clark today said Labour would look at the issue. Entrenching means a 75 percent majority vote in Parliament would be needed to abolish the seats, which is a bottom line for the Maori Party in any post-election negotiations. Getting rid of the seats is a National policy.

Mr Key said the move showed desperation on Labour's behalf.

"I have made it clear to the Maori Party in the discussions that we've had that abolition of the Maori seats is not a bottom line. They have never ever raised with me the issue of entrenchment now you know I'm not ruling it out but I'm not ruling it in."

Asked if it could be a deal breaker Mr Key said he was not going to prejudge negotiations and said the Maori Party had a range of priorities. There were also a range of outcomes from the Maori Party abstaining on confidence and supply through to full coalition.

"Let's not prejudge things before we have an election."

Mr Key told the crowd that New Zealanders had a clear choice to make.

He said the economy had suffered under Labour even before the international financial crisis, wages were too low and productivity had dropped.

He criticised Labour's transition package of giving a new job search allowance to people made redundant for 13 weeks.

Mr Key said that meant people married to a worker earning $100,000 would get the benefit while less well off single income families missed out.

"Where are the priorities of a Labour government? They are not about people in need?... It's a shoddily poorly thought through plan."

Mr Key said the policy was rushed out to beat National and it showed.

"They want another three years? I don't think so."

Mr Key said Miss Clark's plan for New Zealand began and ended with winning the election, which prompted a heckle from the audience that was his plan to.

"Our plan is actually to change New Zealand for the better sir," Mr Key responded before detailing what National would do on law and order, education and other policies.

"I for one haven't got a plan to win an election. I have a plan to change New Zealand for the better."

More by NZPA

More on:

Comments and questions
8

Why is it that they maori seats can be entrenched by a simple majority? It seems to me to be counter-intuitive to allow a simple majority to pass a law which can only be repealed by a 75% vote. Is this not an issue for all New Zealanders to make via a binding referendum?

It's not too bad MAtt.
I beleive that Parliamentary procedure?, require that there be a 75% vote to entrench any legislation that is being debated; if there is clause which requires a 75% vote to subsequently remove it from statue.
Unlikely that any combination of parties is going to provide a 75% parliamentary advantage in this election.

As I understand it, any provision or Act requiring a 75% majority for particular action can be revoked by a subsequent Act that requires only a simple majority. Thus something that has been entrenched can be changed by simple majority if done in two stages. Stage one to revoke the entrenchment provision itself (requiring only a simple majority) and stage two, also then requiring a simple majority, to change whatever had been entrenched. Another option would be to pass a new Act (by simple majority) that revokes the Act containing the entrenchment provision and substitutes a new Act without the entrenchment provision.

I am going to the Warehouse to buy a pair of jandals to send to Key, 'cause he is about to do a flip flop on the Maori seats. And putting the Maori seats entrenchment idea to a national referendum is a no-brainer, as your average redneck Pakeha would vote against it, and someone would probably then gather signatures for a referendum to abolish the Maori seats.

....As your average red necked Pakeha would vote against it ...
Not so the average New Zealander is tired of parasites feeding of of their efforts.

Key has never said he wouldn't negotiate. He has remained consistent. He has always based his decisions on integrity. And that has meant ruling out NZ First of any coalition partnership arrangement. Labour on the other hand have said that the Maori Party would be the last cab off the rank at the last election. What has changed? Labour will coax anyone and partner with anyone to retain the treasury. As far as they are concerned it has nothing to do with being able to work with others, it's all about compromise at any cost. Wrong key is definately off key!

Let's not pretend here.

Craig, you are being naive! Key will do anything to gain the treasury benches. There is no guarantee that he will have a majority on Saturday
and then he'll compromise quicker than a L.A. lawyer!

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>