Member log in

Labtests loses 10% of laboratory testing contract

Labtests has lost 10% of its market share to rival Diagnostic Medlab after Auckland’s three district health boards stepped in to improve its dismal performance, admitting the move from one large provider to another may have been “a bite too large.”

Effectively a penalty for Labtests, after months of complaints and questions of quality control, the arrangement is part of a wider raft of changes including key performance indicators for both companies.

Auckland Regional District Health Board governance committee chairman Pat Snedden said it intervened to safeguard the quality delivery to the people of Auckland.

The ARDHB said it would strictly monitor the KPIs and make them publicly available every month.

Diagnostic Medlab (DML) will cover private sector work, including private hospitals, private specialists, private home visits, fertility treatment and rest homes.

Asked what assurances of quality service he could make to public sector patients in the three to four months expected to bring Labests “up to scratch,” Mr Snedden said introducing publicly available KPIs would significantly inform the debate.

The ARDHB would remedy any situation where people were not performing, he said.

He would not say if Diagnostic Medlab was likely to win more than a 10% share of the contract should Labtests fail to meet those KPIs.

“We’ll work out what happens if we have an under performing arrangement going into the future.”

Mr Snedden said the four-year contract to transfer 10% of the more complex testing to DML would take some of the pressure off Labtests at the front end.

It would also use some of the redundant capacity in the pathology and science workforce.

“This change will take pressure off Labtests enabling them to deliver a safe and reliable high quality mainstream service to their contract specifications. Diagnostic Medlab can utilise its exiting workforce to take on the private hospital and specialist work.

“Diving up this work under the supervision of the ARDHBs is the most considered route to ensuring delivery of a measurable, high quality, safe service,” he said.

Mr Snedden said the three DHBs would absorb the additional $4.4 million cost to have two providers – paying a total of $71.4 million instead of $67 million a year.

The move follows a “quality and safety turn around assessment team” (QSTAT) at Labtests led by Johan Vendrig, chief information officer at Auckland DHB.

He said Labtests was “doing its best” to address issues.

Pathologist Ian Beer who has assessed both Labtests and Diagnostic Medlab for the job over the past two weeks, said the problems with Labtests arose from logistics, handling, data entry and processes that worked reliably.

“DML has the advantage of running the system for 10 years, Labtests has had to start up from scratch,” he said.

Mr Beer anticipated it would take two to three months to bring those systems up to scratch.

More by Andrea Deuchrass

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
6

Where's the penalty to Labtests?
DHB's are paying $4.4m EXTRA per year for this change. All costs should come straight out of Labtests contract price since they clearly are not able to provide the contracted service. Why the hell should the taxpayer have to make up for Labtests defficiencies. Labtests is a large public company. Their managers must be jumping for joy. Got rid if all the "hard" and "difficult" clinical tests that require lots of skilled staff AND not penalised in any meaningful way as well. Bet the champagne is being knocked back in their corporate HQ.
The DHB managers could not organise a booze-up in a brewery, much less a major commercial contract.
Oh, but I forgot - it's not their money is it!!

Surely the Board, which made the asinine decision in the first place, should be considering its position in all this?

They were warned repeatedly that culling out the incumbent and giving the entire contract to a company that had no resources in place was asking for trouble.

If there is a problem with the price offered by the incumbent and a new comer offers to beat it dramatically then surely some alarm bells ring... if it's too good to be true it probably is.

And of course, who gets to pay... we do.

This whole affair has been a disgrace exacerbated by a high court decision that took no account of the needs of the public.

I was one of the first patients to use Labtests' Browns Bay facility. I left there with a bruise the size of a Snax cracker inside my arm, my results were sent to the wrong doctor, and they refused to mail results to me whereas DML always had. Three days after I had been to Labtests I went back to DML and paid for the tests to be repeated. I will continue to have regular tests at DML, and pay for them because I simply DO NOT TRUST Labtests!

It is regrettable that at DHB Board level there has been a display of incompetance in addressing a conern about costs relating to the former contract with DML. The sensible approach would have been to review costs withn the former provider rather than toss the baby out with the bath water and start all over. Not only was the approach taken by the Board nieve the costs to the providers and their staff far exceed any benefit that an open tender system may appear to offer in the eyes of inexperienced Government officials
The Board has now made the right decision in reallocating a portion of the contract to DML, but why has the Board allowed Labtests to continue to receive the contracted sum for undertaking less than the contracted volume of work?
Some downward adjustment of the Labtests fee is surely expected.

The executive staff of the DHB's who were behind the debacle over the loss of the contract by DML should be fired. I would personally hope that Geraint Martin at Counties Manukau would pack his bags after his earlier reassurances in newspaper correspondence have been found sadly wanting.
There has been little reference to the loss of the trusted Specialist Pathologists who previously worked at DML and the inadequate number of "ring in" replacements that Labtests have provided.
I hope that we eventually end up with alternative laboratory services as an interim measure and the public will then be able to vote with their feet and regain the world class service that DML previously provided.

Well I saw the interview with the ADHB boss and John Campbell last night and it was clear to methat he accepted no responsibility for this going wrong. Therefore neither did any of his staff do anything wrong.

Apparantly it was just a small matter of Labtests not understanding our "culture" here in NZ - thats all.

This is not a commercial organisation people - they are not expected to be accountable for their screw ups - just blame someone else. Simple as that right?

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>