Little remorse from Field as sentence handed down
Former MP Taito Phillip Field showed no emotion as he was led from the courtroom today after being sentenced to six years’ jail time.
Field, Bible in hand, repeatedly shook his head as the details of the 11 charges of bribery and corruption and 15 of attempting to pervert the course of justice were read to him by Justice Rodney Hansen in the High Court at Auckland.
The long-serving MP for Otahuhu and Mangere was found guilty of the charges in August. Justice Hansen sentenced him to a cumulative four years for the bribery and corruption charges and two years for the obstructions of justice.
He had been acquitted of nine charges.
The starting point had been seven and a half years, but the Judge took 18 months off in consideration of Field’s history of community service and the shame he had already experienced as a result of the investigation and trial.
Justice Randerson said more time could have been taken off the sentence had Field shown greater remorse for his actions, rather than just regret.
The saga began in 2005 when rumours surfaced that Field had been accepting labour from Thai immigrants in exchange for assistance in the immigration process since 2002.
The obstruction of justice charges relate to Field’s misconduct during the subsequent investigation by Noel Ingram QC. Field lied about the events in question several times, and told the Thai immigrants in question to go along with his story.
In front of a crowded public gallery Justice Hansen acknowledged Field did not disrupt judicial process directly because the inquiry itself had no judicial power. But he said in finding him guilty the jury must have believed the inquiry could have led to a police investigation, and in attempting to stop that happening, justice had been obstructed.
In considering the length of sentence he said he had read 89 statements in support of Field’s character from various walks of life.
But, he said, some were so grateful for the good Field had done for them in his capacity as a constituent MP that they could not appreciate the guilty verdict handed down by the jury.
And Justice Hansen did not give any weight to Field’s being a member of parliament.
“From those to whom much is given, much is required,” he told Field, quoting President John F. Kennedy, who he said knew a thing or two about the burdens of holding public office.
“You were given power and authority and with that power and authority comes an obligation of trust. You broke that trust and that undermined the very institutions that it was your duty to uphold.”
He said the corruption had begun in an innocent enough manner, when Field helped two Thai nationals with the immigration process and gave them a place to stay in a property he owned. The couple did some plastering in the house by way of expressing their gratitude and refused payment for anything but the materials used.
But that interaction was the beginning of a slippery slope and “tangled web”, Justice Hansen said.
“It was actually a test of your character which in my view you failed because when your public and private duty and your private interests came into conflict your private interests prevailed.”
He said even when Field offered payment for future jobs on several of his properties (including what was to be his retirement residence in Samoa), he believed he was simply going through the motions.
“You knew they wouldn’t charge because that is what they had repeatedly said. By the time of the alter jobs it was taken for granted.”
He accepted the likelihood of reoffending was low, but wanted the sentence to act as a deterrent.
Crown lawyer Simon Moore QC said outside the courtroom the case and 14-week long trial had been exhausting, and he would not say whether he was disappointed with the sentence. He had pushed for a 10 year sentence in court.
“It’s just a really sad day, it’s a sad day for everyone in the New Zealand community. No one’s happy with any sentence but it was a very careful judgment.”
Defence lawyer Paul Davison had pushed for a sentence no longer than four and a half years.























Comments and questions21
Even though JFK said this, he was quoting the Word of God: Luke 12:48. Who cares whether JFK said it - lets specify the originator! Unless the judge stipulated that JFK said it, there's no reason to even mention JFK, is there?
Something is fundamentally wrong with this country's justice system when rapists and murderers get away with lesser sentences.
I agree with Kahikatea.
When are we going to be blessed with journalists who can write factually accurate reports; without the need for sensationalising and name dropping.
Good journalisim speaks for it'sself, without the need for irrelevant source quotes.
He got of lightly
When you are a cabinet minister and engage in cheap sleaze ,you bring the integrity of all parliament into question.Now as a felon he should be deported when his sentence is up.
Shame he didn't rob a bank - he'd have been out sooner!
Well its about time. But my question still remains. How is it that the case was delayed from coming to Court by such an incredibly long time? It is now more than 2 years since the charges were laid, and that after lengthy investigations. We know that Labour did not want Field to be convicted until after the Elections. They needed his tacit support in the House as they had such a slender coalition based majority.
Are we to believe that Politicians put pressure on the Judiciary to put off completing this process, for that reason? Does anyone in authority know the real inside story?
Surely with such a conviction he must now lose the title Taito as this undermines the honour of such a title? So please let's call him Phillip Field.
I believe it was Justice Hansen who sentencing Mr Field, rather than Justice Randerson - guess the names and faces are similar??
I think the sentence is unduely harsh.
Jail term unnecessary! Having suffered a conviction, fall from grace, and very likely loss of travel perts, I think Taito has been punished enough. There is absolutely no reason to waste a jail cell on him, as he is not a dangerous or violent law breaker. Jail should be used for dangerous criminals only, and double bunked too.
Use some common sense, please!
Huang, unless you have benefited from this sort of corruption yourself, I cannot imagine how you could be opposed to legitimate punishment?
The sort of authority that sort of government position holds, demands absolute integrity and honesty. This guy does not even recognise he did anything wrong for good ness sakes!
We have enough dodgy investment advisers in this country, without it getting into Parlimant as well.
The wee illegal Thai who Philip befriended never had it so good ,whats a few tiles among friends.
Deserves it, but gee, if only we could get violent crims to serve a decent sentence. Justice seems way out of whack in this country. I'd much rather see violent crims put away for a long time. Some of these pansy judges need someone to get violent on their families, maybe then they'll act.
So Huang - according to your logic of "no violence no prison time" while collar criminals should never go to jail.
So Bernie Madoff could still ply his ponzi schemes & Bridgecorp & other dodgy finance company boys - assuming they are convicted - could go straight back and set up another finance company. I'm sure the poor buggers who lost their life savings to these guys will have an opinion that!
Jail should only be a last resort for a convicted person like Taito. There are other forms of punishment like stripping of perts and heavy fines. When the jails are overflowing, it make sense to reserve jail space for the violent ones. Of course, what I say will not go down well with violent criminals.
Meant to say "White collar criminals"
When the guy who punched a 78 year old Indian gent recently, and as a result he died ,the jail term 3years,out March 2010 go figure.
I'm with "less for manslaughter" 3 years for the violent killing of a 78 year old man....6 years for a white collar crime??Perhaps the judge who resided over this case should have been the man for the manslaughter case...
The Manslaughter judge who gave the 3YEAR TERM was a Woman.
The road rage killer only had 9previous convictions .Philip had none ,i suppose that explains the massive differences in sentences.YEAH RIGHT.
Sentenced to six years (out in two years). Let's not forget that the primary reason for a jail sentence is to punish the criminal.
On the subject of prison sentences, half all current terms of imprisonment, make the time in prison a true punishment experience (whereby five years feels like ten years) which will result in major cost savings and no further need for new prisons. A simple solution, unfortunately not politically correct...