Meridian Energy’s underlying profit after tax for the year ended June 30 was down 13% to $219.0 million, a $32.9 million fall from last year.
Meridian is one of a handful of state-owned enterprises in line for a partial sell-down if National wins the next election.
The reduction was largely driven by the increase in depreciation charges ($35.0 million) following the revaluation of Meridian’s New Zealand generation assets at 30 June 2010.
It was also due to the increase in net finance costs ($22.6 million) due to extra funding requirements to advance generation developments.
Group net profit after tax was $303.1 million, an increase of $119.1 million on last year, which included the one-off net gain of $157.4 million from the sale of the Tekapo A and B hydro stations to Genesis Energy on June 1..
Ebitdaf (earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation and financial instruments) was $659.9 million, an increase of $18.2 million (3%) compared with the same period last year.
The result includes $28.1 million (net of legal expenses) received from Meridian’s largest customer RTA Power (New Zealand Aluminium Smelter) following a settlement concerning liability for electricity during the 2008 potline outage at the Tiwai smelter.
Other factors were flat electricity demand compounded by the Christchurch earthquakes and the warm autumn/early winter, high hydro storage levels and the loss of generation following the sale of the Tekapo A and B hydro stations.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- No knockout blows in first presidential debate, says NBR's Nevil Gibson
- Intueri's problems raise questions for the board, says Martin Watson of the Shareholders Association
- ANZ's Philip Borkin and NBR's Jason Walls on what's next for the kiwi dollar on Currency Talk
- AngelEquity's Bill Murphy on why his platform won't cater for retail investors
- Spark exec Jason Paris defends his company's honour after it tops ComCom's most-complained-about list
- FMA lawyer Justin Smith counters the Goldman Sachs defence