Meridian's West Coast hydro dam gets go-ahead
Meridian Energy has received the go-ahead for its proposed Mokihinui hydro scheme north of Westport, outraging conservationists.
The state-owned power company plans to spend about $300 million building an 80-metre high hydro dam and power station 3km upstream of the settlement of Seddonville.
The dam would create a 14km-long lake.
"The hearing committee decided two-to-one to grant the consents -- it was a particularly difficult and finely balanced decision," West Coast Regional Council compliance and consents manager Colin Dall said.
The 34 consents would be subject to some 200 conditions.
Forest and Bird South Island manager Chris Todd said the group was considering lodging an appeal with the Environment Court.
"We're pretty outraged by this decision. This will be the biggest inundation of conservation land ever in New Zealand," he said.
Another dam was "completely unnecessary and highly destructive".
"If we are now damming pristine rivers, then nothing is safe "It's a huge backward step for conservation," Mr Todd said.
Mokihinui's river gorge and forest contained rare species including native ducks, giant land snails and long-fin eels.
"You can't replace a river like the Mokihinui, you can't buy it and you can't compensate for it."
Hydro Development Limited's recently approved Stockton hydro scheme north of Westport, and TrustPower's St Arnaud hydro scheme, meant any other power projects were unjustified on the West Coast, Mr Todd said.
Meridian and Buller interests have welcomed the dam's approval.
Meridian chief executive Tim Lusk said its hydro project had the "overwhelming support" of locals, and security of supply would be significantly improved.
"For a long time the West Coast has been dependent on a long and vulnerable transmission line transporting power to the region from the Waitaki. Mokihinui will allow the region to use its own natural resources to provide a source of clean, renewable power."
Meridian would carry out coastal erosion control works.
"Clearly we are aware that there will be some environmental impact from the project," Mr Lusk said.
"The decision contains a large number of conditions aimed at ensuring that environmental effects are kept to a minimum."
Buller Mayor Pat McManus said the district needed a reliable source of energy if it was going to grow.
However, the large number of conditions imposed could be a challenge to the scheme proceeding, he said.
Commissioners have imposed a raft of requirements including: mitigation measures, management plans and monitoring programmes, 'adaptive management' conditions, habitat enhancement and predator control (over 3000ha), an initial bond of $500,000, plus $500,000 to the Buller District Council for 'community purposes' in the Mokihinui Catchment.
Meridian has previously said the scheme would produce between 310 and 360 gigawatt hours per year of electricity and power about 45,000 homes on the West Coast.
Construction was expected to take three years and employ more than 300 workers, dropping to six once the dam was up and running.























Comments and questions5
Yipeeeeeeeeee........
About time the coast got one over the green/communist bloc
In the words of Bob Jones 'a victory for us ordinary blokes'
It is because of the airheads like Chris Todd in the past, that we now have a shortage of electricity throughout the country.
Come on Chris !!, give us some equally economic and viable alternatives, instead of your steady diatribe of negatives every time there is any mention of 'progressive developmen' in this country.
Chris you also forgot the rare endangered nearly extinct yellow feathered flying fish!
You reckon this is a good thing? Short sighted is the only way to describe your responses.
One economically and viable alternative, Lammermoor wind farm, 630MW for $2b (By the time the EC has finished with the Mokihinui it will cost twice that). But I'm sure that you all jumped for joy about Oliver's 'championing' the 'victory for us ordinary blokes'. How about any other number of projects that rich land holders complain will ruin their view while all of NZ has to lose a river like the Mokihinui.
The comment I find funniest is 'got one over the green/communist bloc'... The irony is that what is currently happening in NZ; SuperCity, ECan, Mining, are actually eroding our democracy and taking us closer to the totalitarian version of government that you profer as evil. Thick as two short... yellow feathered flying fish? A least they sound like they have still.
G'night
The trouble with you communists Jeremy is that when people do come up with, say, a windfarm proposal that you scream 'not in my backyard' just like we saw 'Oliver' (as you mentioned) do.
And every time anyone wants to do anything with a river or other public area it suddenly takes on 'great ecological significance'. Now we Coasters haven't noticed too many of you reds making a point of camping.tramping or even stopping at the Mokihinui River yet it is now one of your favourite places.
Give us a list of all the ecologically significant rivers in NZ up front so that the next scheme can be formulated on one that isn't going to evoke irrational raving from the Commo's masquarading as Greens
An ideological dislike of anything socialist means you have misread my post. I am for wind-farms, 100%. I think they're beautiful (now that they have gotten rid of those hideous pylon lattice masts). Holland even gets tourists because of theirs.
My issue is that hydro is being exploited (not in a good way) by the power companies because it's cheap. $300m for 80MW translates into a dam freehold after 6 years. The consent is 35years, that means huge profits for the power company and no benefit for you, the local. 6 jobs, security of supply... oh and the right to subsidise Tiwai point and Rio Tinto. The locals, in the case of the Mokihinui that means NZs cos it is a beauty, get feck all. Don't be like the Maori party and sell out for a good deal when really you're getting shafted... wasn't there are tale about something like that... the emperors new clothes or something?
Re ecologically significant rivers, we are trying. Water Conservation Orders are the means by which this is achieved and we are trying. Unfortunately the blue's masquarading as Greens have decided to derail that process in the case of the Hurunui and all Canterbury rivers and the Coast will be next.
I love the coast, I'm there at least once a year for multiple weeks as a kayaker and as an instructor/guide and the loss of the Mokihinui will be significant to me. It should be for you.