Member log in

Metlifecare shareholders approve amended merger deal

UPDATED:

BUSINESSDESK: Metlifecare shareholders have voted in favour of an amended merger proposal, after the retirement village operator reduced the number of shares it will use to pay for the deal and abandoned plans to raise new equity capital.

“The merger is a significant milestone for the company and brings with it a number of benefits for Metlifecare and our shareholders,” managing director Brent Harman said.

Metlifecare amended changes to its proposal this morning, winning over the majority of institutional investors. Its initial proposal was criticised as being too generous to major shareholders.

Metlifecare will get eight new resthomes in the merger with Vision and Private Life Care Holdings, which are to receive shares in the enlarged company as payment. 

That boosts its portfolio to 24 villages, three of which are in development. The number of units will increase to 3902 from 2460, while brownfield and greenfield capacity climbs to 1011 units from 380 units.

Retirement Villages New Zealand, Metlifecare's biggest shareholder, is selling down its stake in the retirement village operator.

Shares in Metlifecare have shed about 5% this year and are trading at $2.16.

 


10am:

BUSINESSDESK: Metlifecare has amended the terms of its merger proposal again, halving the shares it will issue to Vision Senior Living and flagging possible property sales as a way to repay debt rather than raising equity from third parties.

The 11th-hour changes have won over the majority of institutional investors and the company is confident the merger will win support at a shareholder meeting today to vote on the plan.

The resthome operator’s initial proposal was criticised as being too generous to major shareholders, who are involved in the merger.

Metlifecare will get eight new resthomes in the merger with Vision and Private Life Care Holdings, which are to receive shares in the enlarged company as payment.

Under amendments announced today, the consideration for Vision shareholders is cut to 10 million shares from 20 million.

Instead of raising $10 million in equity from third-party investors, the company will now “rationalise its property asset portfolio to provide further headroom in its balance sheet”, according to the statement from managing director Alan Edwards.

That move has the support of the company’s bankers, he said.

“The majority of Metlifecare’s institutional shareholders have advised that the transaction, following these amendments, will be supported,” Mr Edwards said.

The company’s independent directors and management “are confident that the proposed acquisition will receive the requisite support at today’s meeting”.

Metlifecare has also hired CBRE to value its assets for the year ending June 30 and said given recent transactions in the sector and the level of economic activity, the discount rates and property price growth assumptions may be downgraded.

“Initial discussions and analysis indicate that these changes will result in a reduction to Metlifecare’s net assets of between 15% and 20% relative to December 31, 2011,” the company said.

Under the old proposal, Vision’s private equity shareholders Goldman Sachs and Arrow International were to have received 13 million shares with the prospect of a further 7 million shares within 28 months if the stock reached a target of $3, a level it hasn’t traded at since November 2008.

The stock last traded at $2.16.

The plan was changed even though an independent report by Northington Partners deemed the original version fair to minority shareholders.

Private Life Care is owned by Metlifecare's biggest shareholder, Retirement Village Group.

The merger will boost Metlifecare's portfolio to 24 villages, three of which are in development. The number of units will increase to 3902 from 2460, while brownfield and greenfield capacity climbs to 1011 units from 380 units.

Comments and questions
4

MET is not a resthome operator, it is a retirement village operator. It actually has very few rest homes, and the ones it does have i suspect may now be up for sale, as I don't see how it is possible to sell the underlying properties of the retirement villages, given they are pledged as security for the occupational right agreements.

As an aside, shareholders in the Maui/Goldmans private equity funds that own Vision Senior Living must be mightily disappointed with how these negotiations have gone....they've been well and truly screwed down by the institutions...

Sure they'll be disappointed, but they clearly didn't have a better alternative. The fact they accepted the revised offer, shows just how poor the Metlifecare independent directors are, clearly having zero perspective of what fair market value is. It's pretty disgraceful really.

Yip - it always looks bad for Directors who recommend something that the shareholders then reject. Whenever that happens, they should all be up for reelection at the next AGM as the obviously don't have the support of shareholders.

Met Life has performed very poorly for years , it cant make up its mind what it really is .Probably more of a developer these days .Cliff Cook is the only one that scored here .
VS Living was a dog , the model never worked thats why they will take anything for it .The investors got sucked in when they purchased it from the original owners ,Sandy ? Ted and the other names i cant think of yet ,and Arrow jumped on board for a free ride and more fees !