Member log in

Microsoft set to unveil Vista’s successor, Windows 7

The last Windows upgrade cycle left a long time between drinks. Windows XP hit shelves in October 2001. Then it was more than five years before Windows Vista succeeded it in January 2007.

Now, Microsoft seems ready to step back to its former upgrade pace, which saw it release a revision of Windows every couple of years in pre-XP times.

To wit, the company today announced it will unveil new details about Vista’s successor, codenamed Windows 7, at its WinHEC developer conference November 5 to 7 in LA. At the same time, Microsoft will release Windows 7 code to third-party software developers – a key phase in the development of a new OS that shows Windows 7 is strongly in train.

With many large organisations yet to upgrade from XP, the relatively early emergence of Windows 7 raises the possibility that many will simply skip a generation, ignoring Vista altogether while they wait for the new OS.

If so, they should take a look at history. An apparently near-finished version of Vista was first unveiled in July 2005. But endless last minute tweaks, and niggles from US and EU antitrust agencies, meant the final version took more than 18 further months to emerge.

And Vista’s first service pack – a milestone many companies wait for before they upgrade, since it irons out bugs that bedevil early adopters – was only released in February this year.

This time around, some insiders are saying the reverse pattern will hold true. Windows 7 is officially due in 2010, but Microsoft may actually push the date forward to next year, reacting to Google’s move to make its web browser, Chrome, a de facto Windows of the internet, housing its free, ad-supported Google Gears software (like Chrome, still in beta) which will compete against Microsoft’s Office cash cow.

While Vista is famously hardware-hungry, early, sketchy reports say Windows 7 will run on Vista-capable hardware. Support for a multi-touch touch-screen (similar to that used by the iPhone and Microsoft’s own table-top Surface computer, currently only available in the US) is another of the new features.

With compatible PC hardware, the technology will let a user draw onscreen with their fingers, or touch the screen to quickly flip through a slideshow, or push a map around a display.

More by By Chris Keall

Comments and questions
11

Unless MS follow the rules of structured programming and keep application code out of the OS layers, 7 will be just as bad as vista. I can't see this happening as they imbed the apps to force the user to use crap like IE and windoze media player. MS is doomed - they simply can't write good code. They can't make the best apps. They only have market share from illegal practices.

7 is built with by the same folk that threw vista together- who should've been fired en-mass. my guess is that 7 will be vista at it's core, with every committee and coder stuffing the same mess they put into vista just to prove it wasn't their fault- the end result will be vista again. MS is doomed; all Apple has to do is open up their OS to run on PC hardware, or it'll be Linix- but MS will be gone in 25 years.

well the people complained enough and now microsoft is going to try and forget this crappy OS. I've been using it and there have been numerous compatibility issues and so many warnings for simple things that I'm not sure Ill ever buy a PC again

uh, are you ignoring the 300 million dollar ad campaign? I'm pretty sure that's not just skipping the "crapy" os you claim it to be.

I have Vista it's great, faster and nicer looking. NO problems. It must have been really bad when it first came out bc everyone hates it but I cannot figure out why.

Vista is so much better and superior to its predecessor XP. Are people vain and do not want to see any changes to their OS. You must move forward with times. If we never accept a change we would be looking at Win 3.1 or even DOS. Besides, Vista is efficient, productive, much more advanced and easier to use.

Try turning on your computer one evening and getting just a black screen that says "Boot MNG is missing". Try having to call India at 3am because the sata drive you installed demands a new license key from microsoft to run on VISTA, or how about all the software and printers that never worked because I could never find vista compatible drivers. How about the initial upgrade to vista that demanded I wipe my hard drive clean before it would accept the upgrade and then didn't recognize the upgrade disk because the original software couldn't be recognized...I sold my pc on ebay and bought a mac

On the same hardware Vista boot (to no disk activity) is 4 minutes, XP is 1.5 minutes. Vista memory use is 680 MB, XP is 250 MB. And so on. Why do we flagellate ourselves.

Vista is the best thing MS have done. Why are people so lazy that they don't want to take the time to get this great OS working properly and enjoy its great features.

Set your life more easy get the business loans and all you require.

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>